Ok, stiil it is the same quantity..glad to know others share this idea. Actually, I was thinking RODD = 1 - DD/Profit ..this way, an ideal value would be 1 and negative values would indicate a clearly unacceptable scenario and are easy to identify. Perhaps this can be coded to filter optimization results automatically for writing to a file.
Depends completely on your strategy. Some have big drawdowns as part of the strategy, some don't. It wouldn't be much meaningful to simply pluck a number out of the air without correlating it to the underlying strategy.
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Looking at some optimization results, I asked myself the question: Is this profit worth this drawdown? Placing the results into a spreadsheet I figured a simple ratio of drawdown (in cash) to cash profit would more meaningfully describe which result is actually optimal. Thus, a ratio of 1 means that a given profit amount was accompanied by an equal drawdown; clearly unacceptable. And you go from there.. perhaps ratios of <0.2 can be considered acceptable.
Would you agree with this method? Does anyone know of a better, more objective way of quantifying an answer to this question?