
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
No, it's not lost. Except there's this huge rock there, and everything crashes against it. As an electronics guy, you'll understand. I'll try to keep it consistent.
That's very clear. Thank you. About the dt sampling step variation. Do you think it is random or has any predictable character? If the variation of dt is predictable, we can write a Fourier series into it. We get two nested Fourier series: the first for the prices themselves and the second for the time step dt. In this case we get something similar to a frequency (or phase) modulated signal:
harmonic h(t) = mh + ah*cos(wh*t) + bh*sin(wh*t)
time t = mt + at*cos(wt*t) + bt*sin(wt*t)
total h(t) = mh + a*cos(wh*(mt+at*cos(wt*t)+bt*sin(wt*t)) + ...
There is a whole direction in Fourier analysis called nonuniform fourier transform.
Hey, for some reason the indi won't display in mt5 under indicators. I did compile the indi, and restarted mt5. All the other indis work except the two extrapolation indis you posted in the codebase.
.. If the variation in dt is predictable...
I don't think so. Not even predictable, I'm sure it's not predictable. There's no physics to it. It's a random variable. There's some research on it here https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/103289.
Unfortunately I have very little experience with such processes (it's very complicated). The best option is to go beat up the person who made such a clock :-) usually helped)). But this method does not work here.HideYourRichess:
Кстати, а почему бы спектр, в виде гистограммки, сразу не строить?
Are you suggesting this for visualisation or for finding strong harmonics from this spectrum? Thanks for the attached links in the previous post. We will read them.
An extrapolation in the form of candles would look interesting, not a line (not a criticism but a suggestion. I am weak as it is).
The period should be tied to time, so that it would be recalculated when switching timeframes. Otherwise, the picture is not quite clear and really contradictory.
For example, in hours T = hr * 60.0 / Period().
And it is better to adjust the series in resonance with the already passed data, like quickly scan and choose a variant by minimum RMS or maximum correlation, then the forecast is more likely to coincide with the real picture.