Help with writing the EA

 
Colleagues,
Please help write adviser on the basis of the indicator.
I tried the program but it did not do anything
Attached here is the EA
HELP Pliz!
 

awesome, another decompiled EA

 
I did laugh at the property owner link though... (beware, it's a hardcore porn site)
 
Viffer:
I did laugh at the property owner link though... (beware, it's a hardcore porn site)


I never knew that there is a porn site by this name, I just saw the movie other day by this name and that thing came to my mind and so I named it.
Its not a decompiled EA btw))
 
Jay007:


I never knew that there is a porn site by this name, I just saw the movie other day by this name and that thing came to my mind and so I named it.
Its not a decompiled EA btw))

Of course its a decompiled ea. That's as obvious as my nose.

 

Its not a decompiled EA btw))

Dude you are in a developer forum, of all the people on the planet that would know what they are looking at when they look at mql source code it would be us and that source code you uploaded in your OP was, without a shadow of a doubt, generated by a decompiler.

This is a funny situation you are in. You either think us to be fools, in which case it begs the question why would you be seeking out the fools with hopes they could/would provide free assistance. Or you think us to be the mql developing experts we are, and hence you really have come to the right place for assistance with legitimate code development requests (and part of being such experts we are fully capable of recognizing decompiled code a mile away).

So which is it? Come looking for the help of fools or were you foolish enough to bring to the experts some obviously questionable source material?

 
Viffer:
I did laugh at the property owner link though... (beware, it's a hardcore porn site)

LOL!!! That's the first time the word 'porn' has been used on this site. Viffer, your name will live forever.

 
1005phillip:

Dude you are in a developer forum, of all the people on the planet that would know what they are looking at when they look at mql source code it would be us and that source code you uploaded in your OP was, without a shadow of a doubt, generated by a decompiler.

This is a funny situation you are in. You either think us to be fools, in which case it begs the question why would you be seeking out the fools with hopes they could/would provide free assistance. Or you think us to be the mql developing experts we are, and hence you really have come to the right place for assistance with legitimate code development requests (and part of being such experts we are fully capable of recognizing decompiled code a mile away).

So which is it? Come looking for the help of fools or were you foolish enough to bring to the experts some obviously questionable source material?


Niether of us are fool.
I said its not a decompiled EA but I never refused the fact that its decompiled, and its decompiled from an Indicator, should read my first post,thanks
 
Jay007:

Attached here is the EA

Ahhh, we obviously misunderstood you... it's a stolen indicator not a stolen EA... that's OK then.

On that basis, lets take a look. Oh wait... no buffers, no drawing, Ordersend(). There's your problem right there, it's a decompiled EA.

 
Jay007:


Attached here is the EA


Niether of us are fool.
I said its not a decompiled EA but I never refused the fact that its decompiled, and its decompiled from an Indicator, should read my first post,thanks

As far as you are concerned its decompiled but not from an EA ?

Wrong on that count, the code you posted is a decompiled EA, maybe you meant to post the decompiled indicator but you made a mistake ?

I wonder where CB is, he always knows the right thing to say in times like this.

 
Jay007 wrote >>

Niether of us are fool.

Ah, now see there, what you done gone and did is open and your mouth and proved beyond a doubt...

Abraham Lincoln wrote >>
It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to open one's mouth and remove all doubt.

Jay007 wrote >>


I said its not a decompiled EA but I never refused the fact that its decompiled, and its decompiled from an Indicator, should read my first post,thanks
Reason: