Sell profitable EA based on AT&CF method with proper MM

 
It uses trend detection technique and adaptive digital filters to work. MM is based on history and free margin.
Will answer questions via email kiri4a@gmail.com or here.




Strategy Tester Report

Contest Pro v5
AlpariUK-Demo (Build 211)

SymbolEURUSD (Euro vs US Dollar)
Period5 Minutes (M5) 2007.01.02 00:00 - 2008.02.22 22:55 (2007.01.02 - 2008.02.24)
ModelEvery tick (the most precise method based on all available least timeframes)
Bars in test84674Ticks modelled1591822Modelling quality90.00%
Mismatched charts errors1




Initial deposit50000.00



Total net profit567783.23Gross profit1484376.96Gross loss-916593.73
Profit factor1.62Expected payoff317.02

Absolute drawdown14797.39Maximal drawdown158427.30 (32.54%)Relative drawdown57.76% (87673.26)

Total trades1791Short positions (won %)32 (34.38%)Long positions (won %)1759 (77.37%)

Profit trades (% of total)1372 (76.61%)Loss trades (% of total)419 (23.39%)
Largestprofit trade4518.00loss trade-9390.60
Averageprofit trade1081.91loss trade-2187.57
Maximumconsecutive wins (profit in money)140 (133865.86)consecutive losses (loss in money)37 (-18419.60)
Maximalconsecutive profit (count of wins)142032.40 (80)consecutive loss (count of losses)-70397.30 (26)
Averageconsecutive wins21consecutive losses6
 

L

Good you have single broker history test data - got any forward testing results?

Good PF and win/loss ratio but I'd be concerned over the drawdown figures.

I've seen EA's with highish drawdowns do unexpectedly poorly in live trading - though you could live with this in a high-risk EA, if your PF was higher?

Re the low win % on the shorts, does the code look at underlying longer-term trends adequately - for trade/no trade &/or lot sizing ?

FWIW

-BB-

 
Yes, drawdown figures are concern i agree. But this depend on the MM. With constant position size drawdown drops with more than 10%.
Thank you for your comments, i will rethink some parameters.
Reason: