Jeremy Scott / Profil

Deep Takeover trading systems are highly adaptable and not over fitted. If you are sick of seeing good screenshots in the marketplace and losing in real trading, try a beautiful, adaptive, under fitted system! Available for FIFO, Netting, and Hedge accounts.

MT4 - FIFO : https://www.mql5.com/en/market/product/52867
MT5 - Netting, not hedge: https://www.mql5.com/en/market/product/52725
MT5 - Hedge:// www.mql5.com/en/market/product/53312

Deep Takeover YouTube Channel : https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCiTLLEnzzuO96U19cGmB8lg

Deep Takeover Discord community chatroom: https://discord.gg/tCh27r5

***** Important! Please Read *****
It is your responsibility to find settings (.set files) to use on your Metatrader platform with your broker.
If you don't know how please check the channel and learn, again: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCiTLLEnzzuO96U19cGmB8lg
I have already put much time into producing videos and full optimization records for so many symbols and time frames.
Please respect my time.
It is disrespectful to ignore my helpful training videos and ask me to do something you can easily do yourself.
If MQL work could replace my income, then I would be more than happy to continually produce .set's
I made Deep Takeover inputs SO EASY AND FAST TO OPTIMIZE YOURSELF
***************************************

-----

I have been a trading system developer for a decade and have learned many valuable lessons.

If it works on only one or a few symbols or only one time frame- don't bother. It is over fitted and will probably not stand price behavior changes over time.

If it makes billions of dollars in back tests- you cannot trust it. I made a system that turned $100 dollars into more than a billion in a couple years, only on EURUSD backtesting. Look me up in the articles, this was my system "Freak" from many years ago.
This type of system looks good in the strategy tester but not in real life. In fact if billions can be made in the strategy tester, it is likely that such a system takes advantage of tick generation mechanics of "every tick" instead of "every tick based on real ticks" and real trading will suck and blow the account in live mode.

If it uses a martingale strategy then with time the chances continually increase that the account will be blown. You can win small for a while, but it is gambling and high risk.

Most indicators are not reliable. Most combinations of indicators are not reliable. Especially with the way most developers use them.

Trading with the trend, especially the "strong trend" indications, is less and less reliable. Increasingly, by the time a trend is identified, it is over.

Breakout systems, due to a rise in fake-outs are less and less reliable- that's a sharp breakout with an even sharper reverse in the opposite direction much sooner than expected.

Stop losses, while every broker and most popular traders recommends them, has never proven to make an under-fitted system more profitable.

Trailing stop losses are the worst thing you can put on any system other than ultra-strong breakout trades, but typically the strong breakout fakes will reverse and hit your SL fast.

Without trying to predict anything at all a counter trend grid system can be the best (almost) guaranteed way to earn money, however requires a huge account balance and small per trade lot sizes to stay profitable without blowing the account in times of strong trend. Not friendly to accounts under $10,000

A good general trading strategy is to trade in the direction of a higher time frame trend on a lower time frame's movement against that higher time frame's trend as macro forces are more reliable than micro forces. For example 20-50 trades a year on H4 timeframe can be just as profitable as 50000 trades a year on M1 timeframe and with much higher win %

I believe my current system "Deep Takeover" for MT4 and MT5 is the best I've ever done. Testing shows a majority of settings passing on a majority of time-frames and symbols. The best settings for any symbol also work on a majority of other symbols.
It doesn't follow any mainstream trading ideology (that I know a word for anyway!) It's not a grid, not a martingale, not a scalper, not a trend "follower", not a "counter" trend trader, no visible SL/TP, yet because the trend does affect its targets i have placed it under the trend category.
You can expect consistent trading frequency, reliable trade execution, fast testing, and a high probability of profit (no *guarantee* of profit is legal or ethical to make).

Now if you're looking for that EA that will make you millions in a year from under $1000 starting, you aren't yet mature or experienced enough to know that those are always a sham- if they worked like that you would see at least one signal with such results as MQL5 has been around for 10 years. Go ahead, learn your lesson, lose your money, and when you wise up, come find me.