|
2 Jahre
Erfahrung
|
12
Produkte
|
3
Demoversionen
|
|
0
Jobs
|
5
Signale
|
23
Abonnenten
|
📊 Systematischer & algorithmischer Trader | Live-Signale | MT5 Expert Advisors & Tools | Seit 2011
Ein Multi-Strategie-EA-Portfolio mit diszipliniertem Risikomanagement.
Handel seit 2011 · Algorithmisch seit 2018 · Live-Signale auf MQL5 seit 2024
⚙️ Handelsansatz
- Vollautomatische Strategien (Expert Advisors)
- Multi-Strategie-Portfolio
- Kapitalschutz vor Wachstum
- Kein Martingale / kein Grid / kein Nachkaufen in Verluste
📈 Meine Signale
Aufgelistet im Reiter Signale oben. Jedes arbeitet mit Stop-Loss und festem Risiko pro Trade, und hinter jedem steht eine echte Strategie, die ich selbst einsetze und überwache.
🧰 Meine Expert Advisors
Regelbasierte Systeme, die Sie auf dem eigenen Konto laufen lassen statt zu kopieren — im Reiter Markt oben. Ein harter Stop auf jeder Position, gemessene statt versprochene Zahlen, und eine kostenlose Demo für Ihren eigenen Strategietester.
🛠️ Meine Tools
MetaTrader-5-Werkzeuge, die ein Konto schützen statt es zu handeln: Stop-Loss-Durchsetzung, Prop-Firm-Regeln, Drawdown-Grenzen, Trade-Audit, lokales Kopieren. Die meisten sind kostenlos.
⚡ Infrastruktur
Professionelles VPS für stabile Ausführung und geringe Latenz.
🔎 Transparenz
Hier gibt es keine Demokonten und keine Backtests, die als Live-Handel ausgegeben werden.
Die vollständige Historie, samt der Verlustmonate: https://technotrader.net
⚠️ Risikohinweis
Handel ist mit Risiko verbunden, und Drawdowns gehören normal dazu.
Handeln Sie nie mit Geld, dessen Verlust Sie sich nicht leisten können.
_______________________________
🔗 Dienste, die ich selbst nutze und empfehle:
🌐 Broker (ICTrading)
https://www.ictrading.com/?camp=83911
📒 Handelsjournal & Analyse (FXer)
https://fxer.net
💱 Code: TECHNOTRADER50 (50% Rabatt für 6 Monate)
🏛️ Prop-Firma (The5ers)
https://www.the5ers.com/?afmc=92n
🧪 Strategie-Inkubator (Darwinex Zero)
https://www.darwinexzero.com/?fpr=y68tgd
💱 Code: TECHNOTRADER_20 (20% Rabatt)
Einige der obigen Links sind Affiliate-Links.
_______________________________
📧 Kontakt
💬 Telegram https://t.me/TechnoTrader28
▶️ YouTube https://www.youtube.com/@TechnoTraderStream
TechnoTrader | Automatisierte Handelssysteme
Folgen Sie den Signalen, betreiben Sie einen EA auf Ihrem Konto, testen Sie die kostenlosen Tools oder fragen Sie auf Telegram.
Ein Multi-Strategie-EA-Portfolio mit diszipliniertem Risikomanagement.
Handel seit 2011 · Algorithmisch seit 2018 · Live-Signale auf MQL5 seit 2024
⚙️ Handelsansatz
- Vollautomatische Strategien (Expert Advisors)
- Multi-Strategie-Portfolio
- Kapitalschutz vor Wachstum
- Kein Martingale / kein Grid / kein Nachkaufen in Verluste
📈 Meine Signale
Aufgelistet im Reiter Signale oben. Jedes arbeitet mit Stop-Loss und festem Risiko pro Trade, und hinter jedem steht eine echte Strategie, die ich selbst einsetze und überwache.
🧰 Meine Expert Advisors
Regelbasierte Systeme, die Sie auf dem eigenen Konto laufen lassen statt zu kopieren — im Reiter Markt oben. Ein harter Stop auf jeder Position, gemessene statt versprochene Zahlen, und eine kostenlose Demo für Ihren eigenen Strategietester.
🛠️ Meine Tools
MetaTrader-5-Werkzeuge, die ein Konto schützen statt es zu handeln: Stop-Loss-Durchsetzung, Prop-Firm-Regeln, Drawdown-Grenzen, Trade-Audit, lokales Kopieren. Die meisten sind kostenlos.
⚡ Infrastruktur
Professionelles VPS für stabile Ausführung und geringe Latenz.
🔎 Transparenz
Hier gibt es keine Demokonten und keine Backtests, die als Live-Handel ausgegeben werden.
Die vollständige Historie, samt der Verlustmonate: https://technotrader.net
⚠️ Risikohinweis
Handel ist mit Risiko verbunden, und Drawdowns gehören normal dazu.
Handeln Sie nie mit Geld, dessen Verlust Sie sich nicht leisten können.
_______________________________
🔗 Dienste, die ich selbst nutze und empfehle:
🌐 Broker (ICTrading)
https://www.ictrading.com/?camp=83911
📒 Handelsjournal & Analyse (FXer)
https://fxer.net
💱 Code: TECHNOTRADER50 (50% Rabatt für 6 Monate)
🏛️ Prop-Firma (The5ers)
https://www.the5ers.com/?afmc=92n
🧪 Strategie-Inkubator (Darwinex Zero)
https://www.darwinexzero.com/?fpr=y68tgd
💱 Code: TECHNOTRADER_20 (20% Rabatt)
Einige der obigen Links sind Affiliate-Links.
_______________________________
📧 Kontakt
💬 Telegram https://t.me/TechnoTrader28
▶️ YouTube https://www.youtube.com/@TechnoTraderStream
TechnoTrader | Automatisierte Handelssysteme
Folgen Sie den Signalen, betreiben Sie einen EA auf Ihrem Konto, testen Sie die kostenlosen Tools oder fragen Sie auf Telegram.
Aller Uja
The record, drawn: two thousand each way, give or take.
Long 2,326. Short 2,121. Drawn as one bar with the 50% line through it, the split lands at 52.30%.
That evenness is not a design goal and it is not balance anyone maintains. It is what a rule set with no view about direction produces on its own, over enough decisions. Nothing in the logic asks where the market is going.
It is also the easiest bias to check on any signal page and one of the least checked. A person accumulates a directional lean without noticing, usually toward whatever paid last, and it shows up here as a split that is not flat. If a page runs 70/30 long across thousands of trades, that is either a deliberate bias the seller should be stating, or an accidental one they have not noticed.
https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/2307342
Long 2,326. Short 2,121. Drawn as one bar with the 50% line through it, the split lands at 52.30%.
That evenness is not a design goal and it is not balance anyone maintains. It is what a rule set with no view about direction produces on its own, over enough decisions. Nothing in the logic asks where the market is going.
It is also the easiest bias to check on any signal page and one of the least checked. A person accumulates a directional lean without noticing, usually toward whatever paid last, and it shows up here as a split that is not flat. If a page runs 70/30 long across thousands of trades, that is either a deliberate bias the seller should be stating, or an accidental one they have not noticed.
https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/2307342
· 1
Aller Uja
The record, drawn: there is no second colour on this bar.
Algo trading: 100%.
The bar looks like a mistake for about a second, and then it is not. There is no second colour because there is no human slice. Every position in this record was opened by rules, sized by rules and closed by rules.
That row is worth finding on any signal page you are considering. Below 100%, the missing share is a person deciding, and a person is the one component that cannot be copied, repeated or tested. You can backtest a rule. You cannot backtest a mood on a Thursday afternoon.
It is also the row that makes every other number on the page mean something. A track record produced partly by hand tells you what one person managed in one stretch of market. A record produced entirely by rules tells you what the rules do.
https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/2307342
Algo trading: 100%.
The bar looks like a mistake for about a second, and then it is not. There is no second colour because there is no human slice. Every position in this record was opened by rules, sized by rules and closed by rules.
That row is worth finding on any signal page you are considering. Below 100%, the missing share is a person deciding, and a person is the one component that cannot be copied, repeated or tested. You can backtest a rule. You cannot backtest a mood on a Thursday afternoon.
It is also the row that makes every other number on the page mean something. A track record produced partly by hand tells you what one person managed in one stretch of market. A record produced entirely by rules tells you what the rules do.
https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/2307342
· 1
Aller Uja
Hat ein Produkt angeboten
LIVE-SIGNAL - TechnoTrader EA Showcase Index Cadence handelt ein einziges Instrument, den CFD auf den US-Technologieindex, untertägig und vor dem Handelsschluss glattgestellt: rund 275 Trades pro Jahr, 57,2 % pro Jahr bei einem schlimmsten Equity-Drawdown von 16,9 % im Standardpaket, gemessen von 2020 bis 2026 auf einem Konto mit 3000 USD. Das ist kein heiliger Gral, und wir verkaufen es auch nicht als solchen. Es ist ein gemessener Vorteil, diszipliniert ausgeführt, auf Kursen, die bereits
· 1
Aller Uja
The record, drawn: the average trade, to scale.
The bar is 101 weeks of live record. The accent mark at its left edge is the average holding time: 56 minutes.
At this scale that mark is 0.05 pixels wide. It had to be drawn at one pixel to exist at all, which means the picture already flatters it by a factor of twenty.
This is the inverse of the usual chart trick. Most pages stretch a small number until it looks like something. This one draws a real duration against the real record that contains it and lets it disappear, because that disappearance is the honest fact: 4,441 decisions, each of them over inside an hour, assembled into something measured in years.
It is also why judging this by any single trade is a category error. You would be judging the record by 0.05 pixels of it.
https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/2307342
The bar is 101 weeks of live record. The accent mark at its left edge is the average holding time: 56 minutes.
At this scale that mark is 0.05 pixels wide. It had to be drawn at one pixel to exist at all, which means the picture already flatters it by a factor of twenty.
This is the inverse of the usual chart trick. Most pages stretch a small number until it looks like something. This one draws a real duration against the real record that contains it and lets it disappear, because that disappearance is the honest fact: 4,441 decisions, each of them over inside an hour, assembled into something measured in years.
It is also why judging this by any single trade is a category error. You would be judging the record by 0.05 pixels of it.
https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/2307342
· 2
Aller Uja
Hat ein Produkt angeboten
Swing Meridian ist ein regelbasiertes Swing-Trading-System, verpackt als EA. Sein Kern ist ein Swing-Korb aus 11 Instrumenten, der Ausbrüche aus Tagesniveaus handelt. Zwei kleinere Teilstrategien stützen ihn: eine Intraday-Teilstrategie mit drei Paaren und eine Mean-Reversion-Teilstrategie mit vier Cross-Paaren - insgesamt 18 Instrumente. Einfach gesagt, das ist alles, was es handelt. Der Swing-Korb: Gold (XAUUSD), Silber (XAGUSD), Öl (XTIUSD), vier Yen-Paare (AUDJPY, CADJPY, CHFJPY, GBPJPY)
· 2
Aller Uja
The record, drawn: what a 69% win rate actually buys.
Sixty-nine of every hundred trades on this account close in profit. That number sells itself, and on its own it is close to meaningless.
Drawn beside it is what the frequency buys: for every 1.00 this account has lost, it has earned 1.28. That is the profit factor, and it is the same account on the same day as the 69%.
Both are true because the wins are individually smaller than the losses. Winning often and winning big are different achievements, and a page that shows you only the first one has chosen which half to show.
The hit rate is the easy half to improve. Take fewer marginal trades and it climbs, while the account earns less. Anyone quoting a win rate without the payout beside it is quoting the half that moves on demand.
https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/2307342
Sixty-nine of every hundred trades on this account close in profit. That number sells itself, and on its own it is close to meaningless.
Drawn beside it is what the frequency buys: for every 1.00 this account has lost, it has earned 1.28. That is the profit factor, and it is the same account on the same day as the 69%.
Both are true because the wins are individually smaller than the losses. Winning often and winning big are different achievements, and a page that shows you only the first one has chosen which half to show.
The hit rate is the easy half to improve. Take fewer marginal trades and it climbs, while the account earns less. Anyone quoting a win rate without the payout beside it is quoting the half that moves on demand.
https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/2307342
· 1
Aller Uja
The record, drawn: the hole and the climb back.
Deepest drawdown 503.91 EUR. Net profit since the account opened 1,978.54 EUR. Drawn as two bars on one scale, the second is just under four times the first.
That ratio has a name on the page. It is the recovery factor, and it reads 3.93 today. It answers the one question the growth figure cannot: the damage happened, so was it repaired, and by how much.
Note the phrase "on one scale". A drawdown drawn on its own axis can be made to look like anything, and that is the most common way a chart lies without stating a false number. Both bars here are drawn from the same zero.
The hole is published so the ratio can exist at all. A page that hides the denominator is asking you to take the numerator on faith.
https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/2307342
Deepest drawdown 503.91 EUR. Net profit since the account opened 1,978.54 EUR. Drawn as two bars on one scale, the second is just under four times the first.
That ratio has a name on the page. It is the recovery factor, and it reads 3.93 today. It answers the one question the growth figure cannot: the damage happened, so was it repaired, and by how much.
Note the phrase "on one scale". A drawdown drawn on its own axis can be made to look like anything, and that is the most common way a chart lies without stating a false number. Both bars here are drawn from the same zero.
The hole is published so the ratio can exist at all. A page that hides the denominator is asking you to take the numerator on faith.
https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/2307342
· 2
Aller Uja
The record, drawn: what the gross figures actually say.
Gross profit 9,199.20 EUR. Gross loss 7,173.47 EUR. Both from the same table, one line apart, and almost nobody reads them together.
Drawn as one bar, the picture is uncomfortable in a useful way. Of every euro this account has earned, 78 cents went straight back out again. What survives is 2,025.73 EUR net, spread across 4,420 trades.
That thin remainder is the entire business. Everything else is turnover, and turnover is what a growth percentage quietly hides.
It is also why the discipline matters more than the entries. A margin this thin does not survive one oversized position taken to make a bad week feel better.
https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/2307342
Gross profit 9,199.20 EUR. Gross loss 7,173.47 EUR. Both from the same table, one line apart, and almost nobody reads them together.
Drawn as one bar, the picture is uncomfortable in a useful way. Of every euro this account has earned, 78 cents went straight back out again. What survives is 2,025.73 EUR net, spread across 4,420 trades.
That thin remainder is the entire business. Everything else is turnover, and turnover is what a growth percentage quietly hides.
It is also why the discipline matters more than the entries. A margin this thin does not survive one oversized position taken to make a bad week feel better.
https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/2307342
· 2
Aller Uja
Reading the page: the longest winning streak.
Maximum consecutive wins reads 37. Somewhere in these 4,419 trades, thirty-seven closed in profit one after another. Sixteen rows further down sits its mirror, a run of 16 losses.
Both are things that happened. Neither is a tendency, and neither predicts anything about the next trade. A streak is what a sequence of independent-ish outcomes looks like when you run enough of them, and it appears in random data too.
The reason the pair is worth reading together is that people size up during the first one and quit during the second. Same table, same system, two opposite mistakes.
If a page shows you long winning streaks and no losing ones, you are not looking at a steadier system. You are looking at a shorter history.
https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/2307342
Maximum consecutive wins reads 37. Somewhere in these 4,419 trades, thirty-seven closed in profit one after another. Sixteen rows further down sits its mirror, a run of 16 losses.
Both are things that happened. Neither is a tendency, and neither predicts anything about the next trade. A streak is what a sequence of independent-ish outcomes looks like when you run enough of them, and it appears in random data too.
The reason the pair is worth reading together is that people size up during the first one and quit during the second. Same table, same system, two opposite mistakes.
If a page shows you long winning streaks and no losing ones, you are not looking at a steadier system. You are looking at a shorter history.
https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/2307342
· 3
Aller Uja
Reading the page: the Sharpe ratio row.
The statistics table shows a Sharpe ratio of 0.05. Read next to the figures funds and brokers quote, that looks alarming, and the comparison is meaningless.
The page does not state the period the ratio is computed over. An unannualised per-trade or per-day figure and an annualised yearly one are different statistics wearing the same name, and one is arithmetically much smaller than the other for the same account. Nothing on the page lets you convert between them.
So the row is usable in exactly one way: compare it against the same row on another MQL5 signal, where the calculation is at least the same. Compare it against a fund's published Sharpe and you have learned nothing about either.
That is true of more rows on this page than most people assume, which is the reason this series exists.
https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/2307342
The statistics table shows a Sharpe ratio of 0.05. Read next to the figures funds and brokers quote, that looks alarming, and the comparison is meaningless.
The page does not state the period the ratio is computed over. An unannualised per-trade or per-day figure and an annualised yearly one are different statistics wearing the same name, and one is arithmetically much smaller than the other for the same account. Nothing on the page lets you convert between them.
So the row is usable in exactly one way: compare it against the same row on another MQL5 signal, where the calculation is at least the same. Compare it against a fund's published Sharpe and you have learned nothing about either.
That is true of more rows on this page than most people assume, which is the reason this series exists.
https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/2307342
· 1
Aller Uja
Reading the page: best trade and worst trade.
Two rows near the bottom of the statistics table. Best trade 45.28 EUR. Worst trade -58.93 EUR. The worst single trade is larger than the best single trade, and here that is the normal shape rather than a warning.
A system whose best trade dwarfs its worst usually lets winners run and cuts losers hard. That reads well and it depends on catching the rare large move. This one does the opposite. It takes many small outcomes and accepts a slightly longer tail on the losing side, and the account is positive because the wins are more frequent rather than because they are bigger.
What the pair is actually for is a sanity check. If the best trade is a large share of total profit, the record rests on one lucky day and would not survive without it. Here the best trade is well under one percent of gross profit.
https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/2307342
Two rows near the bottom of the statistics table. Best trade 45.28 EUR. Worst trade -58.93 EUR. The worst single trade is larger than the best single trade, and here that is the normal shape rather than a warning.
A system whose best trade dwarfs its worst usually lets winners run and cuts losers hard. That reads well and it depends on catching the rare large move. This one does the opposite. It takes many small outcomes and accepts a slightly longer tail on the losing side, and the account is positive because the wins are more frequent rather than because they are bigger.
What the pair is actually for is a sanity check. If the best trade is a large share of total profit, the record rests on one lucky day and would not survive without it. Here the best trade is well under one percent of gross profit.
https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/2307342
· 3
Aller Uja
Reading the page: the longest losing streak.
There is a row in the statistics table that most people scroll past. Maximum consecutive losses: 16. Somewhere inside these 4,411 trades, sixteen closed at a loss one after another, and the maximal consecutive loss of -171.24 EUR came out of a run of ten.
This matters more to a new subscriber than the growth figure does. You do not join a record at its average, you join it on a Tuesday. If your first fortnight lands inside a streak like that, nothing has broken and nothing has changed. The same rules that produced the streak produced the rest of the page.
A signal whose table shows no losing streaks at all is either very young or not showing you everything.
https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/2307342
There is a row in the statistics table that most people scroll past. Maximum consecutive losses: 16. Somewhere inside these 4,411 trades, sixteen closed at a loss one after another, and the maximal consecutive loss of -171.24 EUR came out of a run of ten.
This matters more to a new subscriber than the growth figure does. You do not join a record at its average, you join it on a Tuesday. If your first fortnight lands inside a streak like that, nothing has broken and nothing has changed. The same rules that produced the streak produced the rest of the page.
A signal whose table shows no losing streaks at all is either very young or not showing you everything.
https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/2307342
· 1
Aller Uja
A position opens at 0.25 lots. The previous trade on that symbol, closed nine seconds earlier, was 0.10 lots and it was a loss. Something now has about one second to decide whether that is a martingale step and whether to close it...
· 2
72
Aller Uja
A trade copier's hardest job is deciding that a trade has closed
7 August 2026, 10:43
You come back to two terminals and the books do not match. The sending account is in three positions, the receiving account is in two, and the copier's panel has been showing a green light the whole time. Opening a copy is the easy half...
· 2
86
Aller Uja
Reading the page: growth is not return on capital
The Growth figure on a signal page is a platform calculation across the account's entire lifetime, and it accounts for every deposit and withdrawal along the way. It answers what happened to the account. It does not answer what a subscriber would have made.
Two accounts with identical trading can show very different growth if one of them took money out and the other did not. That is not a flaw in the metric, it is what the metric is for.
If you want to know what copying would have done for you, the monthly table and the drawdown row tell you more than the headline. Growth tells you the account survived long enough to compound.
Read it as a history of the account, not as a forecast of your own.
The Growth figure on a signal page is a platform calculation across the account's entire lifetime, and it accounts for every deposit and withdrawal along the way. It answers what happened to the account. It does not answer what a subscriber would have made.
Two accounts with identical trading can show very different growth if one of them took money out and the other did not. That is not a flaw in the metric, it is what the metric is for.
If you want to know what copying would have done for you, the monthly table and the drawdown row tell you more than the headline. Growth tells you the account survived long enough to compound.
Read it as a history of the account, not as a forecast of your own.
· 1
Aller Uja
Reading the page: the two drawdown numbers
My statistics table shows a maximal drawdown of 30.85% and a relative drawdown by balance of 38.63%. Both are correct. They are not the same measurement.
Maximal drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough fall in the balance, in money, expressed against the peak it fell from. Relative drawdown by balance is measured against a different reference and will usually read higher.
If you are comparing two signals, compare the same row on both pages. Quoting the larger number from one and the smaller from the other tells you nothing about which account was steadier.
I hit this today pulling my own figures. Four minutes of checking, and the number I nearly used was the wrong one.
The row that belongs next to Growth on this account is 30.85%.
My statistics table shows a maximal drawdown of 30.85% and a relative drawdown by balance of 38.63%. Both are correct. They are not the same measurement.
Maximal drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough fall in the balance, in money, expressed against the peak it fell from. Relative drawdown by balance is measured against a different reference and will usually read higher.
If you are comparing two signals, compare the same row on both pages. Quoting the larger number from one and the smaller from the other tells you nothing about which account was steadier.
I hit this today pulling my own figures. Four minutes of checking, and the number I nearly used was the wrong one.
The row that belongs next to Growth on this account is 30.85%.
· 1
Aller Uja
Reading the page: Max deposit load.
This one sits low on the page and it is the number I would check first on any signal, before growth, before win rate.
Max deposit load is the largest share of the account that open positions ever tied up as margin. On this account it reads 30.13%. Roughly two thirds of the equity was free at the worst moment.
The reason it matters is the ceiling. Anything under 100% means the account was never leveraged past its own equity. Above 100% means it was, and a page showing 150% is telling you the account survived on borrowed room. It survived this time.
Growth tells you what happened. Deposit load tells you how close the account came to not being there to find out.
https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/2307342
This one sits low on the page and it is the number I would check first on any signal, before growth, before win rate.
Max deposit load is the largest share of the account that open positions ever tied up as margin. On this account it reads 30.13%. Roughly two thirds of the equity was free at the worst moment.
The reason it matters is the ceiling. Anything under 100% means the account was never leveraged past its own equity. Above 100% means it was, and a page showing 150% is telling you the account survived on borrowed room. It survived this time.
Growth tells you what happened. Deposit load tells you how close the account came to not being there to find out.
https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/2307342
· 1
Aller Uja
Hat ein Produkt angeboten
Bevor Sie installieren: was dieses Tool nicht tut. Lesen Sie dies zuerst. Wenn Sie wegen einem dieser Punkte hier sind, ist dies das falsche Tool, und das sollten Sie wissen, bevor es auf Ihrem Chart liegt. - Keine virtuellen oder versteckten Stops, niemals. Jeder Stop ist ein echter serverseitiger Stop beim Broker, sichtbar für Ihren Broker und Ihre Prop-Firma. Nichts wird vor einem von beiden verborgen, und zwar absichtlich. - Ein Symbol pro Chart. Die kostenlose Version handelt das Symbol
· 1
Aller Uja
Reading the page: Annual Forecast.
There is a number on this page right now that says Annual Forecast: -100.00%. Next to it sits Monthly growth: -10.01%. Both are sitting beside a year that is currently +115.56%.
Neither of those two is a forecast or a monthly result. They are arithmetic run over a trailing window and extrapolated. Take a rough recent stretch, project it forward twelve months, and the output is a number that cannot happen and was never meant to be read as a prediction.
I am pointing at it rather than hoping nobody notices, because a subscriber checking this page today sees it too.
The number worth reading is the monthly table. It is a record of what closed, month by month, including April at -16.28% and July at -8.11%. Nothing in it is projected, softened or removed.
A page that computes something automatically is not the same as a page that claims it.
https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/2307342
There is a number on this page right now that says Annual Forecast: -100.00%. Next to it sits Monthly growth: -10.01%. Both are sitting beside a year that is currently +115.56%.
Neither of those two is a forecast or a monthly result. They are arithmetic run over a trailing window and extrapolated. Take a rough recent stretch, project it forward twelve months, and the output is a number that cannot happen and was never meant to be read as a prediction.
I am pointing at it rather than hoping nobody notices, because a subscriber checking this page today sees it too.
The number worth reading is the monthly table. It is a record of what closed, month by month, including April at -16.28% and July at -8.11%. Nothing in it is projected, softened or removed.
A page that computes something automatically is not the same as a page that claims it.
https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/2307342
· 1
Antonius Loubser
2026.08.04
Something BIG time wrong with MQL calculations, I have a signal which is currently over 600% growth, on MQL it displays as -2%, their maths is CRAZY
Aller Uja
2026.08.04
Your own page says it, just quietly. Under the growth chart: "Trading style has changed. Part of history is not included in statistics." That is it. In your monthly table July's 640.98 is grey, not black. Grey means excluded, so August at -1.81 is the only month still counted, and that is your headline number. The 600% was not miscalculated, it was left out. Whatever the intent, the effect is that a spectacular stretch the account can no longer reproduce cannot be used as the headline. Inconvenient when it is your own, hard to argue with as a rule.
Aller Uja
The journal says the guard fired: it printed the line at 14:22, it closed the positions, it stood the account down for the day. The next morning the challenge is failed anyway, and the firm's dashboard shows a daily loss you never saw on your panel. The journal is not wrong...
84