Aller Uja / Profil

Bitcoin Interval: it reads calendar windows, not the tick stream

⚙️ BTCUSD only, about sixty trades a year. One module reads a session window inside the day, the other reads the weekend. It trades the continuation after a window closes, with a hard broker-side stop on every position and a time limit in hours.

📊 Tested January 2020 to August 2026 on a 3000 USD account at the default package: +412.7% in total, 28.3% a year, profit factor 1.50, worst equity drawdown 16.77%, 397 trades. Every calendar year positive.

⚠️ Not a holy grail. A real system with real rules: every entry, stop and exit follows conditions fixed in advance, and nothing is discretionary. Fewer than half the trades close in profit, 47.1%, and the figures above are Strategy Tester results.

🔗 Live at factory defaults on the public EA Showcase account: https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/2387565

💰 Bitcoin Interval, 199 USD: https://www.mql5.com/en/market/product/193069

Four robots, and the question that actually decides it

Not which one is best. Which one trades what you already trade.

⚙️ Gold Tempo, 199 USD. Six gold pairs from one XAUUSD M15 chart: XAUUSD, XAUEUR, XAUGBP, XAUAUD, XAUJPY and XAUCHF. Previous-day level breaks, intraday, nothing held overnight. Tested January 2022 to August 2026 on a 3000 USD account: +1598.2% in total, 86.2% a year, profit factor 1.57, worst equity drawdown 23.82%, 1553 trades. https://www.mql5.com/en/market/product/191673

⚙️ Swing Meridian, 149 USD. Eighteen instruments in three sleeves: gold, silver, oil, yen pairs, crosses and two crypto CFDs. Positions average under two days and a minority run one to three weeks. Tested January 2020 to June 2026 on a 3000 USD account at the default package: 62.4% a year, worst equity drawdown 30.5%, profit factor 1.31. https://www.mql5.com/en/market/product/190521

⚙️ Index Cadence, 149 USD. One instrument, the US tech index CFD on M15, about 275 trades a year, everything closed before the end of the trading day. No overnight, no weekend. Tested January 2020 to June 2026 on a 3000 USD account: 57.2% a year, worst equity drawdown 16.9%, profit factor 1.36. https://www.mql5.com/en/market/product/190845

⚙️ Bitcoin Interval, 199 USD. BTCUSD only, about sixty trades a year, two calendar-window modules and a time limit on every position. Tested January 2020 to August 2026 on a 3000 USD account: +412.7% in total, 28.3% a year, worst equity drawdown 16.77%, profit factor 1.50, 397 trades. https://www.mql5.com/en/market/product/193069

📊 Every figure above is a Strategy Tester result at default settings, each measured separately over its own window, and the listing for each one carries the losing months, the longest losing run and the deepest drawdown next to the return. None of them is a holy grail. Each is one measured edge, executed with discipline.

⚠️ They are deliberately different instruments. Gold Tempo and Swing Meridian both touch gold, so running both is more of the same risk, not diversification. Everything else is separate: an index, Bitcoin, and a basket that spans metals, oil and yen crosses.

⚙️ Each carries a hard broker-side stop on every position. No martingale, no grid, no averaging down, in any of them.

⚙️ The free demo runs any of them in your own Strategy Tester, on your own broker's data, before you pay anything. That report, not this post, is what your account would have seen.

🔗 Three of the four run at factory defaults on the public EA Showcase account, one small real account shared between them: https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/2387565

Index Cadence: six and a half years in the tester, 57.2% a year

⚙️ One instrument, the US tech index CFD, on M15. Around the US cash open the EA measures how far this market normally travels by each time of day, using the last 14 sessions, and draws a band from that. A 15-minute candle closing outside the band is the signal: above it buys, below it sells. Every position carries a hard broker-side stop, and everything is closed before the end of the trading day. No overnight, no weekend.

📊 The tested window, January 2020 to June 2026, a 3000 USD account on the default Balanced package:

57.2% a year
Worst equity drawdown 16.9%
Profit factor 1.36
About 275 trades a year
Year by year: +60%, +40%, +55%, +47%, +85%, +53%, and +30% in the first half of 2026

📈 The picture is the Strategy Tester's own report, nothing redrawn and nothing smoothed. On real tick data instead of one-minute bars the same run gives 56.0% a year at a 16.8% drawdown, with an identical trade count.

⚠️ The honest part, and it is on the listing: fewer than half of these trades make money, 42%, and the 16.9% drawdown is one realised number from one path. Out of sample the same mechanism drew down roughly twice as deep, so plan the default package for 25 to 35 percent, not 17. This is not a holy grail. It is one measured edge, executed with discipline, on real historical data.

⚙️ The free demo runs this same test in your own Strategy Tester, on your own broker's data. That report, not this post, is what your account would have seen.

🔗 Live at factory defaults on the public EA Showcase account, alongside Gold Tempo and Bitcoin Interval: https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/2387565

💰 Index Cadence, version 1.2, 149 USD: https://www.mql5.com/en/market/product/190845

Swing Meridian: six and a half years in the tester, +2218%

⚙️ Eighteen instruments from one chart: an 11-instrument swing basket trading breakouts of daily levels, a three-pair intraday sleeve and a four-pair cross-rate sleeve. Gold, silver, oil, yen pairs, crosses and two crypto CFDs. Average hold under two days, a minority run one to three weeks, and every position carries a hard stop loss from the moment it opens.

📊 The tested window, January 2020 to June 2026, a 3000 USD account on the default Balanced package:

Total return +2218%
62.4% a year
Profit factor 1.31
Worst equity drawdown 30.5%
1798 trades

📈 The picture is the Strategy Tester's own report, nothing redrawn and nothing smoothed. Two months into the window it runs straight into the COVID crash of March 2020, and on through the 2022 rate shock.

⚠️ The same run, the part most listings leave out: worst month -12.7%, four losing months in a row at the longest, and 14 months of waiting for a new equity high. Every figure here is a Strategy Tester result on a raw-spread reference feed, and the other feeds we measured returned roughly 20-40% of those figures. This is not a holy grail. It is one measured edge, executed with discipline, on real historical data.

⚙️ The free demo runs this same test in your own Strategy Tester, on your own broker's data. That report, not this post, is what your account would have seen.

💰 Swing Meridian, version 1.12, 149 USD: https://www.mql5.com/en/market/product/190521

Bitcoin Interval: 199 USD from today, exactly as the page said

🗓 The introductory price of 99 USD ended at the end of Sunday 13 September, the date the product page had named since launch, in every language, together with the line that it would not be extended. From today Bitcoin Interval is 199 USD.

📈 Why the price moves at all. A robot that takes about sixty trades a year cannot prove itself live in a month or in a quarter. So the price follows what can be shown: a measured window today, and a live record that grows slowly. The listing names where it is expected to settle as that record fills in: 799 USD.

⚙️ BTCUSD only. Two calendar-window modules, one reading a session inside the day and one reading the weekend, each entering at the market after its window closes, with a hard broker-side stop sent with every entry and a time limit in hours on every position.

📊 The measured window, January 2020 to August 2026, on a 3000 USD account at the default package: +412.7% in total, 28.3% a year, worst equity drawdown 16.77%, profit factor 1.50, 397 trades. The picture is the Strategy Tester's own report, nothing redrawn. Every calendar year in the window is positive, 2025 included at +9.0%.

⚠️ The cost, from the same run: fewer than half the trades close in profit, 47.1%. Every figure here is a Strategy Tester result. This is not a holy grail. It is one measured edge on real historical data.

💰 Buyers keep every future version at the price they paid, which is the point of buying early at any step.

⚙️ The free demo still runs the full test in your own Strategy Tester, on your own broker's data, before you pay anything.

🔗 Live at factory defaults on the public EA Showcase account, alongside Gold Tempo and Index Cadence: https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/2387565

💰 Bitcoin Interval, version 1.1, 199 USD: https://www.mql5.com/en/market/product/193069

Bitcoin Interval: last day at 99 USD

🗓 99 USD until the end of today, Sunday 13 September. From tomorrow, Monday 14 September, 199 USD. That date has been on the product page since launch, in every language, together with the line that it will not be extended. It is not being extended.

⚙️ BTCUSD only, about sixty trades a year. Two calendar-window modules, one reading a session inside the day and one reading the weekend. Each waits for its window to close, then asks three questions in order, and enters at the market on the bar after the close. A hard broker-side stop goes out with the entry and every position carries a time limit in hours. No pending order resting on a level, nothing to be spiked through.

📊 The measured window, January 2020 to August 2026, on a 3000 USD account at the default package: +412.7% in total, 28.3% a year, worst equity drawdown 16.77%, profit factor 1.50, 397 trades. The picture is the Strategy Tester's own report, nothing redrawn.

📈 Every calendar year in that window is positive, including the thin ones: 2025 returned +9.0% at a profit factor of 1.17, and it sits on the year-by-year screenshot exactly like the good years.

⚠️ The cost, from the same run: fewer than half the trades close in profit, 47.1%. The window was split in half before it was measured, not after, and both halves behave alike. Every figure here is a Strategy Tester result. This is not a holy grail. It is one measured edge on real historical data.

⚙️ The free demo runs this same test in your own Strategy Tester, on your own broker's data, before you pay anything. One-minute bars and the tick model agree, so the result does not depend on optimistic fills.

🔗 It runs at factory defaults on the public EA Showcase account, alongside Gold Tempo and Index Cadence: https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/2387565

💰 Bitcoin Interval, version 1.1, 99 USD until midnight, then 199: https://www.mql5.com/en/market/product/193069

Gold Tempo: four years and eight months in the tester, +1598.2%

⚙️ Six gold pairs from one XAUUSD M15 chart: XAUUSD, XAUEUR, XAUGBP, XAUAUD, XAUJPY and XAUCHF. Previous-day level breaks, XAUUSD leads, median hold about two hours, nothing overnight, a broker-side stop sent with every order.

📊 The tested window, January 2022 to August 2026, a 3000 USD account on default settings:

Total return +1598.2%
86.2% a year
Profit factor 1.57
Worst equity drawdown 23.82%
1553 trades

📈 The picture is the Strategy Tester's own report, 3 000 to 50 945 USD, nothing redrawn and nothing smoothed. Balance and equity on the same axes, so the gap between the two lines is the open position at every point in the window.

⚠️ The same run, the part most listings leave out: worst month -15.4%, 16 losing months out of 55, and 258 days between one equity peak and the next. Every figure here is a Strategy Tester result and the listing labels it as one. This is not a holy grail. It is one measured edge, executed with discipline, on real historical data.

⚙️ The free demo runs this same test in your own Strategy Tester, on your own broker's data. That report, not this post, is what your account would have seen.

🔗 Live at factory defaults on the public EA Showcase account, alongside Index Cadence and Bitcoin Interval: https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/2387565

💰 Gold Tempo, version 1.2, 199 USD: https://www.mql5.com/en/market/product/191673

Index Cadence: judge it in months, not trade by trade

⚙️ One instrument, the US tech index CFD, on 15-minute bars. Around the US cash open it measures how far this market normally travels by each time of day, using the last 14 sessions, and draws a band. A candle closing outside the band is the signal, a hard broker-side stop goes out with the entry, and everything is closed before the end of the trading day. No overnight, no weekend. About 275 trades a year.

📊 Strategy Tester, 3000 USD, 2020.01 to 2026.06, default package: 57.2% a year at a 16.9% worst equity drawdown, profit factor 1.36. Three risk packages, each measured separately: Conservative 0.50% about 23% a year at 7.96%, Balanced 1.00% about 57% at 16.9%, Aggressive 1.50% about 86% at 27.38%. The balance curve on the card is the tester's own.

📊 42% of trades end positive, by design: the average winner made 261 and the average loser lost 142. That is why the win rate is the wrong number to judge by, and the month is the right unit. All 78 months of the test are on the card at one scale, losses drawn as tall as gains: 55 positive, 23 negative, the best +20.7%, the worst -7.4%, the longest run of losing months two, and none of the 67 rolling twelve-month windows negative. A losing month is normal here. Two in a row happened. A third has not, in the test, and nothing in the design forbids it.

⚠️ The cost row: the 17% drawdown is one path through six and a half years. Out of sample the same mechanism drew down about twice as deep, so plan Balanced for 25 to 35 percent, not 17. Every figure above is a Strategy Tester result.

⚙️ The free demo reruns this test in your own Strategy Tester on your broker's data. One-minute bars are a valid model and real ticks give nearly the same result. That report, not this post, is what your account would have seen.

🔗 It runs at factory defaults on the public EA Showcase account, alongside Gold Tempo and Bitcoin Interval: https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/2387565

💰 Index Cadence, version 1.2, 149 USD: https://www.mql5.com/en/market/product/190845

⚙️ Bitcoin Interval: three days left at 99 USD, and the free demo reruns the listing's test on your own terminal before you pay anything.

BTCUSD and nothing else, about sixty trades a year, positions held for hours with a broker-side stop on every one. It reads calendar windows rather than the tick stream, and it enters at the market on the bar after a window closes, so there is no pending order sitting on a level to be spiked through. This is not a holy grail and we will not sell it as one. It is one measured edge, executed with discipline, on real historical data.

📊 Backtest 2020.01 to 2026.08, 3000 USD account, three risk packages measured separately: Steady at 0.5% risk +67.3% at a 4.97% worst equity drawdown and profit factor 1.56, Balanced at 1.5%, the default, +412.7% at 16.77% and 1.50, which is 28.3% a year over 397 trades with 47.1% closed in profit, Aggressive at 2.5% +1350.0% at 28.95% and 1.44. Every calendar year in the window is positive, 2025 included at +9.0%. Strategy Tester figures, labelled as such on the page.

⚙️ How to rerun it yourself. Download the free demo, open the Strategy Tester, symbol BTCUSD, any timeframe, because the chart symbol and timeframe are ignored. Use one-minute bars or the tick model, both agree, so the result does not depend on optimistic fills. Open prices only is not supported. A 3000 USD account on the default package from 2020.01 to 2026.08 reproduces the Balanced row on the feed the listing was measured on. Your broker's feed will differ, and that difference is worth knowing before you buy.

🗓 99 USD until the end of Sunday 13 September, 199 USD from Monday 14 September. The date will not be extended, and buyers keep every future version at the price paid.

💰 https://www.mql5.com/en/market/product/193069

⚙️ Gold Tempo: six gold instruments from one chart, and version 1.2 is on the Market.

XAUUSD, XAUEUR, XAUGBP, XAUAUD, XAUJPY and XAUCHF, all traded from a single XAUUSD M15 chart. XAUUSD leads. The five crosses are each restricted to the role they measured best at, and four of them may only enter while XAUUSD already holds a position the same way. Median hold about two hours, nothing overnight, nothing across a weekend, and a broker-side stop on every position, sent with the order.

This is not a holy grail and we will not sell it as one. It is one measured edge, executed with discipline, on real historical data.

📊 Backtest, 3000 USD account, January 2022 to August 2026, defaults: +1598.2% in total, 86.2% a year, profit factor 1.57, 23.82% equity drawdown, 1553 trades. Three risk packages: Conservative at 1.00% risk gives 52.1% a year at a 15.95% drawdown, Balanced at 1.50% is the default above, and each step up roughly triples the return while adding a few points of drawdown. The cost is on the page too: worst month −15.4%, 16 losing months out of 55. Strategy Tester figures, labelled as such.

⚙️ What 1.2 changed: XAUEUR and XAUGBP each got a module they did not carry before, and module one got a fixed target beside its trailing stop. Four configurations were measured on the same window, split into two halves that do not overlap, and the one that shipped is the one that beats the base in both halves, on return and on drawdown. Existing buyers already have the update.

🔗 It also runs live at factory defaults on the public EA Showcase account, published so you can watch it before you buy: https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/2387565

💰 199 USD, six gold instruments, one chart, every update included: https://www.mql5.com/en/market/product/191673

⚙️ Swing Meridian 1.12 is on the Market, and it now draws the two levels it is watching.

Attach it to one of the swing-basket symbols and two dotted lines mark the break-up and break-down levels the breakout module is measuring right now, with the price on the label. They update every minute and disappear when a level does. You can see how close the market is before anything happens, and you can check the level against your own chart. Any single chart still runs all eighteen instruments; the lines are drawn for the symbol you are looking at.

⚠️ Display only, and that is a decision rather than a limitation. A pending order fills on the broker's server and goes past every gate: the aggregate risk cap, the daily halt, the circuit breakers, the news filter. A live entry is checked against every one of them at the moment it is taken. So the lines show you the level, and the EA still decides at the bar.

📊 What did not change: entries, exits, sizing, risk. The previous version and this one were run in one session on the same set file, 1,797 trades, identical to the cent. The published figures stand.

Also new: an optional news filter for prop accounts, off by default, because the Strategy Tester has no economic calendar and every published figure was measured without it. Switching it on makes the EA do something the backtest never did, and the description says so.

💰 149 USD, eighteen instruments from one chart: https://www.mql5.com/en/market/product/190521

🗓 The full version notes are on the product page under What's new.

Sixty trades a year. Six days at this price.

⚙️ Bitcoin Interval trades BTCUSD only, about sixty trades a year, and every one of them leaves with a stop already on the broker's server. It reads calendar windows rather than the tick stream. Each module measures the move across its window, requires that the move held inside the window, requires the daily trend to agree, and trades the continuation after the window closes. Positions are held for hours.

⚠️ Sixty trades a year means the first weeks on any account show you almost nothing, the public one it runs on included. Judge it on the measured window, 2020 to 2026, thin years included. That record is on the product page and it is not repeated here.

🗓 99 USD until the end of Sunday 13 September. From Monday 14 September it is 199 USD. The date will not be extended, and buyers keep every future version at the price they paid.

🔗 https://www.mql5.com/en/market/product/193069

Four Expert Advisors, four different markets, and one of them goes from 99 to 199 on Monday week.

⚙️ Gold Tempo — six gold instruments on one chart, XAUUSD leading. 199 USD.
https://www.mql5.com/en/market/product/191673

⚙️ Swing Meridian — eighteen instruments across three sleeves, trading breakouts of daily levels. 149 USD.
https://www.mql5.com/en/market/product/190521

⚙️ Index Cadence — the US tech index CFD, intraday, flat before the close. 149 USD.
https://www.mql5.com/en/market/product/190845

⚙️ Bitcoin Interval — BTCUSD only, about sixty trades a year. 99 USD.
https://www.mql5.com/en/market/product/193069

🗓 99 USD until the end of Sunday 13 September. From Monday 14 September it is 199 USD. The date will not be extended, and buyers keep every future version at the price they paid.

They do not overlap, and that is the argument for owning more than one. Gold, eighteen swing instruments, an index intraday, and Bitcoin are separate reasons to be in a trade. When one of them is having a quiet year it is not dragging the others down with it, because it is not trading the same thing they are.

📊 Now the part a sales post usually leaves out. Three of the four run right now on one public account, the TechnoTrader EA Showcase, at factory defaults with nothing changed. That account is three weeks old, it has closed fourteen trades, and it is down 3.13%.
https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/2387565

⚠️ Fourteen trades is not a verdict in either direction and I would not let anyone sell you one, mine included. It is simply what a real account looks like at three weeks old. You can open it and watch it age instead of taking my word for anything, which is the entire reason it is published.

🔗 All twelve products:
https://www.mql5.com/en/users/aller.techno/seller

The record, drawn 15. Two rows on my signal page that almost nobody reads: Long Trades 2,390, Short Trades 2,171.

Across 4,561 closed trades that is 52.40% long against 47.60% short. The account has no directional view.

This is worth checking on any track record you are shown, and it takes one look.

A strategy that is 85% long has not necessarily found an edge. It may have found a rising market and stayed in it, in which case the record describes the last few years rather than the method, and the first sustained decline will say so. The same applies in reverse to a permanently short account.

A near-even split does not prove a system is good. Plenty of balanced strategies lose money. What it does prove is narrower and more useful: whatever this account earned, it did not earn by betting on the weather. It took whichever side its rules found, roughly as often in each direction, for two years.

Long and short counts are on every MQL5 signal page, under Trading statistics. Mine are 2,390 and 2,171.

Techno Long Term, 104 weeks live: mql5.com/en/signals/2307342

The record, drawn 14. Trading activity on my flagship page reads 11.09%.

That is the share of its life the account has an open position. Forty-six trades a week, fifty-six minutes each, and then nothing again. Eighty-nine percent of the time the account owns nothing at all.

This matters for two practical reasons.

If you copy this signal, most of what you will see is an account doing nothing. That is not a fault and it is not the EA being idle in the sense of broken. It is the strategy declining setups that do not meet its conditions, which is the same behaviour that produces the record in the first place.

And if you are judging any algorithmic account, time in market belongs next to the return. Two systems with the same yearly figure are not comparable if one of them was exposed five times as long to get it. Exposure is the thing you actually paid for the return with.

The number is on the page, under Trading activity. It is not one anybody quotes, which is most of why it is worth quoting.

Techno Long Term, 104 weeks live: mql5.com/en/signals/2307342

📊 A risk setting is not always the risk.

On a small account, the minimum position your broker accepts may be bigger than the position the setting calls for. The label stays the same. The money at risk does not.

Lowering the deposit does not always scale a system down. At a certain point, the broker's minimum lot starts to choose the size for you. A setting that is cautious at a larger balance can become more aggressive at a smaller balance without its name changing.

⚠️ The important decision is not whether a smaller account can run the EA. It is whether the trade size your broker permits still matches the loss you chose to accept. If it does not, the cheaper setup is not a smaller version of the same system. It is a different risk decision.

Changing a preset name does not repair a broker constraint. A stronger return earned at unintended risk is not evidence of a better setup. A better return is not a correction for that mismatch. It can be the consequence of it. That is why the small-account row sits beside the others: a buyer can decide whether the extra exposure is intentional, or merely the broker's minimum lot taking over.

This is why Swing Meridian publishes account-size rows beside its standard risk packages, rather than selecting one headline curve. The difference is not a footnote. It changes what the same setting means in money.

Checking an EA should mean more than reading its return. The same file, the same preset and the same trading rules can produce a different actual account when the deposit, contract size or volume step changes. The demo is not a teaser. It is the place to see which version you would actually be running.

🧪 Run it in your Strategy Tester on your own broker's data before you buy. If the minimum lot changes the size of the trade, you will see it. If the actual risk is not one you accept, no preset name can fix it.

Swing Meridian TechnoTrader:
https://www.mql5.com/en/market/product/190521

August is closed. Four out of four live signals finished positive.

Techno Long Term IC +30.81%
Techno Long Term +19.53%
Techno SteadyFlow +11.89%
Techno Growth +6.86%

One thing belongs beside those numbers. Risk was reduced through late July into early August, as announced in June. Full size came back after the August employment report, in the second full week, so the first week and a half of the month still ran small. August's result did not come from a full month at full size, and anyone copying these signals will see that in the shape of their own equity curve.

Nothing in the rules changed. Only the size did, and it is back.

Two signals were closed during the month, Techno Foundation on 22 August and Techno Composite on 30 August. Neither was closed for being in drawdown. Profit factor stayed below one for the whole life of each, which is an absent result rather than a bad patch. The full write-up is in the August monthly review.

Every figure above is on the signal pages, month by month.

🟠 On my public Techno Growth account, Bitcoin is 15% of the trades and 22% of the profit. It earns more than its share.
https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/2338047

📊 On the flagship, 103 weeks, it is exactly its own size: 11% and 11%. Both breakdowns are on the signal pages themselves.
https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/2307342

⚙️ Those are the rules that ship as Bitcoin Interval. BTCUSD only, about sixty trades a year, a broker-side stop on every one.
https://www.mql5.com/en/market/product/193069

🔍 They run live today on TechnoTrader EA Showcase: three of my EAs on one 500 EUR account. That curve belongs to the three together, not to this product.
https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/2387565

📅 99 USD until Sunday 13 September. Then 199. The measured record, thin years included, is on the product page.