Nur Nutzer, die das Produkt gekauft oder gemietet haben, können Kommentare hinterlassen
1234567
Remi Passanello  

As you finally decided to insult me I removed you from Friend list.

As your only goal is to destroy my work, I will not give any answer to your comments anymore.

Everyone could see that you are here to help... :)))

Java de Carvalho  
John, I think there is a mistake on his part as to the judgment of the EA and Remi. I even did initial tests around the 1st of each month since January and EA did not break in no time. As for Remi, he has proven open to suggestions for improvement of its products. I do not think constructive tarnish the image of someone who devotes his full time to build an EA and a brief comment to disqualify an entire process. I think if we add strength within to improve the outcomes would be more useful to come here and dispose of the product.
Hope I have not been harsh. Hug.
Stefano Giacone  
remulix:

As you finally decided to insult me I removed you from Friend list.

As your only goal is to destroy my work, I will not give any answer to your comments anymore.

Everyone could see that you are here to help... :)))

Sorry, I really didn't want to insult you. I know that you worked a lot on it and I don't want to destroy anything. I'm just sad to discover that you don't know what is forward testing. Forward testing is: 

- first you optimize the EA for a certain period (lets say 2013.01.01-2013.06.01)

 

- then you test with the same settings the following period (lets say 2013.06.01-2013.10.31)

 

and you see the difference between the 2 test. If the results are very different this means that there is no correlation between the settings of the previous period with the ones of the following period. 

Remi Passanello  
johntiror:

Sorry, I really didn't want to insult you. I know that you worked a lot on it and I don't want to destroy anything. I'm just sad to discover that you don't know what is forward testing. Forward testing is: 

- first you optimize the EA for a certain period (lets say 2013.01.01-2013.06.01)

 

- then you test with the same settings the following period (lets say 2013.06.01-2013.10.31)

 

and you see the difference between the 2 test. If the results are very different this means that there is no correlation between the settings of the previous period with the ones of the following period. 

I exactly know what is forward testing.

I notice that even with a very bad optimization like you did, my EA still manage to earn pips :)))

What you show is just a proof that you do not know how to use the tester and how to perform a great optimization, and I am not responsible for this.

Ask to Aforrest, Alemparaiso or stephanjagger, they are great  optimizers and will be able to help you.

You must understand that we all aim to earn money with EA, we have no time for pranks like this.

If you search someone to torment just find someone else and definitely stop spamming this page. 

Adrian Forrest  

I read in the Description the EA makes $200k a year, therefore anything over and above this should be a bonus.

In saying that, as per the discussion above I created a Set, Results below.

This didn't take long and it was the 1st set I tested after optimization.

Optimized M30 USDJPY

Optimization Period 01/01/13- 01/06/13 Profit $1,193,000

Fwd Tested 01/06- 31/10 Profit $339,000

Fwd Test 1Month 01/06- 01/07 Profit $51,000

Run YTD Profit $ $1,977,000

The Question is. What would I have done on the 1st of July with a return of $51,000?

The Answer.Take maximum profit & diversify by opening another account running another new optimized set at $500 deposit.

Note: I find it faster to optimize at "Open prices only" the run single tests with "Every tick"

Dateien:
opt_01_06.JPG  79 kb
fwd_06_11.JPG  78 kb
fwd_06_07.JPG  77 kb
Run_YTD.JPG  81 kb
Adrian Forrest  

Note: I find it faster to optimize at "Open prices only" the run single tests with "Every tick"

It should read, then run single tests with "Every tick"

Stefano Giacone  
aforrest:

I read in the Description the EA makes $200k a year, therefore anything over and above this should be a bonus.

In saying that, as per the discussion above I created a Set, Results below.

This didn't take long and it was the 1st set I tested after optimization.

Optimized M30 USDJPY

Optimization Period 01/01/13- 01/06/13 Profit $1,193,000

Fwd Tested 01/06- 31/10 Profit $339,000

Fwd Test 1Month 01/06- 01/07 Profit $51,000

Run YTD Profit $ $1,977,000

The Question is. What would I have done on the 1st of July with a return of $51,000?

The Answer.Take maximum profit & diversify by opening another account running another new optimized set at $500 deposit.

Note: I find it faster to optimize at "Open prices only" the run single tests with "Every tick"

Thanks Aforrest. Did you have similar result with real money?
[Gelöscht]  
I got conflicting results.

I used RoboForex USDJPY: M30 ( set http://rptrade.blogspot.ru/2013/10/universal-trader.html)

deposit $5000

Good results in the last year


And I was a total failure from May 1 to September 1, max DD 100%, stop out occurred on 40% of testing interval


Can I do something wrong?

Adrian Forrest  
johntiror:
Thanks Aforrest. Did you have similar result with real money?

Yes John, I have just made my purchase price back and looking fwd to the rest of this month. I thought I told you I changed Broker because 1 of mine here went bust, considering I had over $50k with them last year I'm happy to have got it out safely!

So I have spent a couple of weeks not trading while setting up new accounts and have just got going again. I will keep you posted.

Remi Passanello  
napoleonik:
I got conflicting results.

I used RoboForex USDJPY: M30 ( set http://rptrade.blogspot.ru/2013/10/universal-trader.html)

deposit $5000

Good results in the last year


And I was a total failure from May 1 to September 1, max DD 100%, stop out occurred on 40% of testing interval


Can I do something wrong?

Hi Napoleonik,

As it's written on my blog, .sets are just examples and I don't check every .set in every situations and periods.

It's good to remember that results are strongly broker dependent. 

You can compare to another .set for Alpari that gives following results for the same periods starting from 500$:

Year 

 

From May to now:

 Anyway as markets behavior are often changing, it's better to optimize the EA quite often .

Regards. 

 

Vladislav Zyryanov  
работает с данными настрйоками как раз только на оптимизированном периоде, а в остальном сливает.. если кто то делала оптимизацию за более большой период прошу сбросить настройки мне в личку, мой компьютер не способен и один параметр обработать за 2 года например
Remi Passanello  

Hi mrvlad25.

Can you ask your question in English please ? Automatic translation is not understandable sometimes.

Regards.

R. 

Vladislav Zyryanov  
remulix:

Hi mrvlad25.

Can you ask your question in English please ? Automatic translation is not understandable sometimes.

Regards.

R. 

Hello! bought the robot and need settings for 2 annual optimization, my computer is not strong
Remi Passanello  
mrvlad25:
Hello! bought the robot and need settings for 2 annual optimization, my computer is not strong

Okay.

You can find some on my blog:http://rptrade.blogspot.com/2013/10/universal-trader.html

If you want to talk about your broker, please send me a private message as it's not allowed here.

 

Regards.

R. 

[Gelöscht]  
У меня есть подозрения в том что автор этого советника смошейничал и выложил нерабочий советник к продаже с подогнаными сетами, т.е он их подогнал на историческом периоде, без использования форвардного периода. Я пробовал его оптимизировать, все сеты которые прошли испытание на историческом периоде, провалили его в форвардном испытании. Мои опасения косвенно подтверждают и то что его "чудо" сеты сейчас сливают
Remi Passanello  
napoleonik:
У меня есть подозрения в том что автор этого советника смошейничал и выложил нерабочий советник к продаже с подогнаными сетами, т.е он их подогнал на историческом периоде, без использования форвардного периода. Я пробовал его оптимизировать, все сеты которые прошли испытание на историческом периоде, провалили его в форвардном испытании. Мои опасения косвенно подтверждают и то что его "чудо" сеты сейчас сливают
Hi napoleonik
Regardless all the time or money I spend to calculate ".sets" each time someone is asking for, what you say is interesting.
And this drives me to the following conclusion:
I will never more post or give any .set to anybody.

And by the way here are some recommendations for everyone:
  1. People have to test and optimize their own sets according to their own way of working or living.
  2. People have to know that trading with a robot is risky because robot builder are not wizards and don't know what the market will be.
  3. Poeple must understand that robot builders are not responsible for earns or losses you may encounter.
  4. Nobody forces you to buy one robot, if you are not interested in, just search for another one, market is made for this.
  5. This bot is really cheap regarding the potential profit if,at least, you understand something in optimizing and are a bit used to Forex or CFD.
  6. his bot is not a scalper and is not designed to work only on Tester.
  7. If you are MT5 or Forex beginner, please don't buy it. 
  8. Please test bot and ask questions before to buy and not after buying, as MQL5 does not allow to give money back to buyers. 

That's all.
Stefano Giacone  
napoleonik:
I have a suspicion that the author of this EA smosheynichal and put junk advisor for sale with podognanymi sets, ie, he drove them to the historical period, without the use of the forward period. I tried to optimize it, all the sets that have been tested on the historical period, it failed in the forward test. My fears were indirectly confirmed by the fact that his "miracle" sets now drained
This is exactly what I stated time ago. 
joe  
johntiror:
这正是我所说的时间之前。

對

這個EA設置的參數並不能對未來造成影響 

Nelson Reis  
I want buy the Universal trader now. I have a VPS to put it. Which the best form to proceed?
Nur Nutzer, die das Produkt gekauft oder gemietet haben, können Kommentare hinterlassen
1234567