The firm is working well, small capital firm has started to profit, over the years tried numerous trading robots, no one like the ET series as impressed me.

ET9 profits reached 88% from last month to today !!

Accounts under $200 have a certain amount of risk

After the release of the US non-farm payrolls data, the ET9 account gain returned +316.99%

This weekend, the ET9 account gain were reached: +389.9%

Hello Hui Qiu,

first at all, this seems to be a very interesting EA and i am thinking about to purchase this ea.

But there is always a difference in the trade execution between backtest and live account results, how can you explain this?

I let the ET1 run in a backtest (using tick data with 99,9% modelling quality) with low risk setting, and the follwing sheet shows the backtest results:

...and for the same period i let i run on a live account, here are the live results:

As you can see:

The 1. live short trade was executed at the 2024.03.11 at 01:15 and closed at 05:15 with a profit

The 1. backtest short trade was executed at the 2024.03.11 at 00:15 and closed at 01:00 with a profit

The 2. live short trade was executed at the 2024.03.11 at 02:30 and closed at 05:15 with a profit

The 2. backtest long trade was executed at the 2024.03.11 at 04:45 and closed at 06:00 with a profit

The 3. live short trade was executed at the 2024.03.11 at 02:45 and closed at 05:15 with a profit

The 3. backtest long trade was executed at the 2024.03.13 at 00:15 and closed at 00:45 with a profit

 ....

from 2024.03.11 up to now the live net loss is about -90$, for the same backtest period the net loss is, with the same settings, about -50$ !

I know that there is always a little difference between backtest and live results because of spreads, slippage...but the difference is after 10 trading days nearly 100% !

I am looking forward to hear from you.

Hello Hui Qui,

thank you for your reply. Well, i think this might be possible, because in fact there were lately some updated versions.

I know, that there are always losses in trades, you cant win every trade, that would be unrealistic scam. For me it is important, that the backtest results are nearly the same as the live results, otherwise backtesting an optimizing is senseless.

I will keep this EA, with low risc settings, on my live account and will have a look how it works.

One of our live accounts did not use the upgraded ET1, but include ET9. in fact, it is the same as your record, (server time GMT+2), if you are careful you can find that the time of ET1 to open an order and close an order is the punctuality of M15, so there is no different situation from backtesting, the spread and slippage are also calculated, and it will not affect ET1, but only affect the cost of your trade, Thanks for using ET1;

There is also this chart record, in addition to including the ET9 record, I believe it is the same as everyone's

加仓时间间隔变为M30，这更为安全

You can set the number of orders added or subtracted, get different results, how to train history data??

Hello Hui Qiu,

thank you for your respone!!!

If you compare my live record with yours, you will recognize that there are differences in the execution:

take a look at 2024.03.14:

in my live accout the open trades were closed at 12:45 with a price of 2171

in your record the open trades were closed at 11:45 with a price of 2171 - i think that is perfect! with a time difference of -1 hour

and now look at 2024.03.19:

in my live accout the open trades were closed at 08:30 with a price of 2158

in your record, the open trades were close at 10:15 with a price of 2152 - why is here surprisingly such a difference?

I am looking forward to hear from you, friendly regards

The data of each broker will be a little different, the EA has used M15 to open orders on time to ensure consistency, but when closing the order, the profit target is not reached due to spreads and slippage, etc., it is possible to come out with different results

Hello Hui Qiu,

i am absolut with you that there might be differences because of the broker, slippage etc. But even if i use the same settings for my broker in the tick data suite and compare the results for the same period with the results in my live account, the execution of the trades and the results in the backtest compared with the live results are always better. In a short run, the differences ar small but over a longer period the effect is huge.

I am really interested in your work and your ea, because of the very good backtesting results and i am thinking about to purchase your ET9, but if i cant find a solution to this problem....