50 EMA WITH RSI CONFIRMATION

Spezifikation



Scenario 1:



Breakout, Retest, and Engulfing Candle Cross Entry

1. **Price Breaks Above/Below the 50 EMA:** - The EA should identify when the price breaks above (for buy) or below (for sell) the 50 EMA.

2. **Retest of the Breakout Level:** - After the breakout, the EA should wait for the price to return and test the breakout level TEST SHOULD BE WITH BEARISH CANDLE IF CASE BULLISH AND TEST WITH BULLSIH CANDLE IF CASE BEARISH (above or below the 50 EMA).

3. **Engulfing Candle Formation:** - The EA should detect the formation of a bullish (for buy) or bearish (for sell) engulfing candle after the retest of the breakout level.

4. **Entry Trigger (Candle Cross):** - The EA should place a trade when the next candle crosses above the high (for buy) or below the low (for sell) of the engulfing candle. ---


#### Scenario 2: Breakout of 50 EMA Without Retest

1. **Price Breaks Above/Below the 50 EMA:** - The EA should detect when the price breaks above (for buy) or below (for sell) the 50 EMA. At the time of the breakout, RSI should be above 50 for a buy or below 50 for a sell.
2. **No Retest of the 50 EMA:** - If there is no retest of the 50 EMA, the EA should proceed with the next step.
3. **Next Candle Crosses Breakout Candle by X Pips:** - The EA should enter the trade when the next candle crosses the high (for buy) or low (for sell) of the breakout candle by a user-defined number of pips (e.g., 5 pips). 4. **Stop Loss (SL) Placement:** - The EA should set the SL below the low of the breakout candle for a buy, or above the high of the breakout candle for a sell. --- ### SL and TP Management for EA 1. **Risk Management:** - The EA should open the initial trade with 1% of the account balance as risk. 2. **Martingale Strategy:** - If the trade hits the SL, the EA should open a new trade with an increased lot size (Martingale) to recover the loss and still target profit. 3. **Take Profit (TP) Management:** - The TP should be user-defined, e.g., targeting 5% of the account balance, and the EA should manage TP and SL accordingly for both risk and reward.


Bewerbungen

1
Entwickler 1
Bewertung
(443)
Projekte
700
34%
Schlichtung
34
71% / 9%
Frist nicht eingehalten
22
3%
Frei
2
Entwickler 2
Bewertung
(43)
Projekte
66
12%
Schlichtung
12
58% / 42%
Frist nicht eingehalten
1
2%
Frei
3
Entwickler 3
Bewertung
(22)
Projekte
21
10%
Schlichtung
4
25% / 75%
Frist nicht eingehalten
0
Frei
4
Entwickler 4
Bewertung
(64)
Projekte
83
28%
Schlichtung
9
33% / 56%
Frist nicht eingehalten
9
11%
Frei
Veröffentlicht: 1 Beispiel
5
Entwickler 5
Bewertung
(11)
Projekte
15
20%
Schlichtung
6
0% / 100%
Frist nicht eingehalten
3
20%
Frei
6
Entwickler 6
Bewertung
(60)
Projekte
87
29%
Schlichtung
24
13% / 58%
Frist nicht eingehalten
7
8%
Arbeitet
7
Entwickler 7
Bewertung
(450)
Projekte
477
69%
Schlichtung
6
67% / 0%
Frist nicht eingehalten
2
0%
Frei
8
Entwickler 8
Bewertung
Projekte
0
0%
Schlichtung
0
Frist nicht eingehalten
0
Frei
9
Entwickler 9
Bewertung
(99)
Projekte
120
23%
Schlichtung
21
29% / 52%
Frist nicht eingehalten
8
7%
Frei
10
Entwickler 10
Bewertung
(457)
Projekte
795
49%
Schlichtung
71
17% / 54%
Frist nicht eingehalten
139
17%
Frei
11
Entwickler 11
Bewertung
(442)
Projekte
570
37%
Schlichtung
106
39% / 33%
Frist nicht eingehalten
17
3%
Frei
12
Entwickler 12
Bewertung
(5)
Projekte
8
13%
Schlichtung
3
0% / 33%
Frist nicht eingehalten
2
25%
Frei
Veröffentlicht: 1 Beispiel
13
Entwickler 13
Bewertung
(39)
Projekte
54
61%
Schlichtung
2
50% / 50%
Frist nicht eingehalten
0
Frei
14
Entwickler 14
Bewertung
(85)
Projekte
169
44%
Schlichtung
3
67% / 0%
Frist nicht eingehalten
5
3%
Arbeitet
Veröffentlicht: 1 Beispiel
15
Entwickler 15
Bewertung
(2)
Projekte
4
0%
Schlichtung
3
33% / 67%
Frist nicht eingehalten
2
50%
Arbeitet
16
Entwickler 16
Bewertung
(311)
Projekte
557
35%
Schlichtung
79
32% / 43%
Frist nicht eingehalten
202
36%
Arbeitet
17
Entwickler 17
Bewertung
(77)
Projekte
243
74%
Schlichtung
7
100% / 0%
Frist nicht eingehalten
1
0%
Frei
Veröffentlicht: 1 Artikel
18
Entwickler 18
Bewertung
(2649)
Projekte
3366
68%
Schlichtung
77
48% / 14%
Frist nicht eingehalten
342
10%
Frei
Veröffentlicht: 1 Beispiel
19
Entwickler 19
Bewertung
Projekte
0
0%
Schlichtung
0
Frist nicht eingehalten
0
Frei
20
Entwickler 20
Bewertung
(255)
Projekte
262
30%
Schlichtung
0
Frist nicht eingehalten
3
1%
Frei
Veröffentlicht: 2 Beispiele
21
Entwickler 21
Bewertung
(271)
Projekte
553
50%
Schlichtung
57
40% / 37%
Frist nicht eingehalten
227
41%
Arbeitet
22
Entwickler 22
Bewertung
(16)
Projekte
22
14%
Schlichtung
8
38% / 63%
Frist nicht eingehalten
6
27%
Frei
23
Entwickler 23
Bewertung
(6)
Projekte
6
0%
Schlichtung
2
50% / 0%
Frist nicht eingehalten
1
17%
Frei
24
Entwickler 24
Bewertung
Projekte
1
0%
Schlichtung
4
0% / 50%
Frist nicht eingehalten
0
Arbeitet
25
Entwickler 25
Bewertung
(173)
Projekte
231
61%
Schlichtung
3
33% / 33%
Frist nicht eingehalten
6
3%
Frei
Veröffentlicht: 1 Beispiel
Ähnliche Aufträge
Project Description I am looking for a highly experienced MQL5 developer to build a professional-grade Expert Advisor for MetaTrader 5, focused on XAUUSD (Gold). This project is not a simple EA, but the foundation of a scalable multi-strategy trading system, designed for long-term development and future upgrades. Core Concept The EA must support a maximum of 5 internal strategies, each working independently but
Hi, Before ordering, I want to verify the quality of your ICT/SMC logic. Do you have an existing indicator or strategy (your own work) that I can test on TradingView? If yes, please provide: 1. A demo (invite-only script or video) 2. Proof it is NON-repainting (explained clearly) 3. Live or replay demonstration (not static screenshots) Specifically I want to see: * Clean swing structure (no consecutive highs/lows) *
Project Overview ​I am looking for a high-level Algorithmic Trader / Developer to build a sophisticated, fully automated scalping system for the Nasdaq-100 Future (NQ) . The system must integrate institutional order flow logic with market structure analysis. ​The core logic must be written in Python , acting as a central hub that bridges ATAS (as the primary data source for Order Flow) and MetaTrader 5 (as the
have the Beatrix Inventor Expert Advisor (EA) that was profitable in the past but has been losing money recently. I need an experienced EA developer/optimizer to study the trade history (especially Stop Loss hits, drawdown periods, SL/TP behavior, win/loss ratio, etc.) and recommend + implement specific tweaks so it becomes consistently profitable again. Your job: 1. Deep analysis of why the EA is no longer
I’m looking to purchase a profitable automated trading system for NinjaTrader that can trade NQ/MNQ or ES/MES futures . My goal is to find a strategy with strong profit potential , even if it comes with a higher drawdown. Please send any algos you have that trade NQ/MNQ or ES/MES with at least a 1-year backtest , preferably a system that is not based on ultra-fast scalping . Scope of work Provide a NinjaTrader
Good morning, I have a Gap Fill strategy and a 10 min opening range break strategy that trade on RTH ES Futures data I have been working on that seem to have some bugs while live trading. They have both been coded by ChatGPT so I would like someone that know how to properly code a strategy to go over each to proof and debug them. Would you be able to do this and could you possibly add some context or features that
hello, please take a moment to review my project. It is for Quanttower. it is very detailed in the instructions. Thank you, Just let me know if you can do it and the whats the cost and timeframe
I’ve been following your profile and I'm interested in your expertise with the ATAS API and C# development. I have a clear technical scope for a high-performance M1 indicator focused on Binary Options and Scalping. ​The core logic is based on institutional Order Flow convergence: ​Stacked Imbalances: 300% ratio with a minimum of 3 consecutive levels. ​Delta/Price Divergence: Filtering for market exhaustion (New Highs
can you help me with editing the existing ATR Trailing Stop Indicator to include a logic to include additional script, where my ninZaRenko bars when it closes above OR below the dynamic stop line, I will be out of trade. Please remember, in this Indicator, now when the price touches the stop line, I am stopped out .. . I want to edit the script, in lieu of the price touch, I like to update this logic to when the bar
attached is an nt8 indicator i would like modifications to. this will not be simple. once you review the indicator you will see it prints arrows and dots. the arrows print after the dots stop forming. i am using default settings, on the instrument es, using ninza renko 8:4 i want the arrow to be placed on the first dot. i do not want the arrow to just be backpainted into the past much like a swing indicator or

Projektdetails

Budget
50+ USD