Stochastic Reversal Signal - MetaTrader 5 için gösterge

Three position-sizing protections that do different things; confusing them is why so many accounts get wiped out: - ladder: one contract per X of balance, always applied as a CAP, even with manual lot sizing; - floor: below the minimum capital it does not trade; a new deposit is needed; - breaker: stops at X% below the peak, at any account size, and does not rearm by itself. What this library solves and almost none does: a deposit is not profit, and a withdrawal is not a loss. The breaker measures the drop against the balance peak. Untreated, a deposit made DURING a drawdown lifts balance and peak together, and the protection stops seeing the drop exactly when it would help. Here deposits and withdrawals shift the peak by the same amount. The peak is persisted to a file: a breaker that forgets the peak on a terminal restart is not a breaker. The demo simulates a deposit at the bottom of a drawdown. Run it with the deposit on and off and compare the "drop" column.

Four EAs writing to the same file, all with FILE_SHARE_READ|FILE_SHARE_WRITE, FileSeek(SEEK_END), FileWrite, FileClose. Looks correct. Every FileOpen returns success. No error in the log. And the lines vanish. Reason: FILE_SHARE_WRITE lets all four open at the same time. All four call FileSeek(SEEK_END) and get THE SAME offset, because none has written yet. All four write at the same position. Whoever closes last wins. Three lines vanish silently. In my case: 12 events expected, 8 in the file. The fix is to open EXCLUSIVELY (no FILE_SHARE_WRITE) and retry while another EA holds the file. And to shout in the log when the retries run out: a log that fails silently is worse than no log at all, because you trust it. The demo script reproduces both modes. To see the loss, drag it onto four charts at the same time with safe mode off and count the lines in the CSV. On a single chart the defect does not show up - which is why it passes in testing and breaks in production.