Rustan Mallari
🔥 120-DAY PERFORMANCE UPDATE — Quantum Queen(LIVE) | JAN 29 START | CXM → VANTAGE CONTINUATION 🔥
Day 120 since January 29 activation (observed/engineered through multiple market cycles)
This is the update I’ve been waiting to publish — because 120 days is long enough to filter out “luck,” “one-week pumps,” and screenshot noise.
This is live tracking, real broker conditions, real execution behavior… and a very clear story:
✅ CXM carried Phase 1 (Jan 29 → Apr 15)
✅ Vantage carried Phase 2 (Mar 20 → present / continued after CXM stopped)
Same system logic. Different environments. The system kept performing.
✅ PHASE 1 — CXM (Jan 29 → Apr 15) | Real USD (Closed)
Final CXM Snapshot
Gain: +34.40%
Abs Gain: +16.86%
Profit: +$4,731.09
Drawdown: 12.67%
Trades: 150
Profit Factor: 2.11
Monthly (CXM):
Feb: +7.06%
Mar: +12.72%
Apr (partial to Apr 15): +11.35%
CXM phase proved the engine could survive and grow through real volatility, real spreads, and real exposure.
✅ PHASE 2 — VANTAGE (Mar 20 → Current) | Real USD (Active)
This is where things got serious.
Vantage Snapshot (Main Low Risk)
Gain: +95.99%
Abs Gain: +31.21%
Profit: +$3,120.87
Drawdown: 6.39% (very controlled)
Balance: $11,837.87
Deposits: $10,000
Withdrawals: $1,283.00
Trades: 208
Profit Factor: 5.85 (exceptional for live automation)
Pips: 41,218.0
Avg trade length: ~8 minutes (fast, efficient execution)
Best trade: +$159.36 | Worst trade: -$144.32
Monthly (Vantage):
Mar: +25.72%
Apr: +14.42%
May: +36.26%
This is the kind of profile most “EA marketers” claim to have… but rarely show with drawdown staying this clean.
🧾 120-DAY COMBINED TOTALS (CXM + Vantage Since Jan 29)
If we combine both phases into one performance story:
✅ Total Profit (combined): $4,731.09 + $3,120.87 = $7,851.96
✅ Total Deposits (combined): $28,057.03 + $10,000.00 = $38,057.03
✅ Combined Abs Gain (profit ÷ total deposits): ~20.63%
Weighted Monthly Gains (combined view):
Feb: ~7.06% (CXM only)
Mar: ~16.14% (CXM + Vantage combined)
Apr: ~12.16% (CXM partial + Vantage)
May: +36.26% (Vantage only — post-CXM continuation)
So yes — the system didn’t just “start strong.”
It continued, even after the broker environment changed.
🔥 What 120 Days Actually Proves
After 120 days of live tracking, the pattern is clear:
✅ Execution consistency > random “perfect win streaks”
✅ Low drawdown control + strong PF = real system behavior
✅ It doesn’t need to overtrade to produce output
✅ The equity curve reflects structure, not chaos
✅ Broker changes didn’t kill performance — the engine adapted
This is what a serious automated system looks like:
Not perfect. Not magical. Just repeatable rules with measurable edge.
🚀 Final Thoughts
CXM was a strong Phase 1 environment.
Vantage has turned into an absolute execution showcase for this setup — especially with the current low-risk profile delivering near doubling behavior while keeping drawdown tight.
Next checkpoint: 150 Days.
— Rustan Mallari 🇵🇭
120 Days Live. Two Brokers. One Engine. Real Tracking. 📊🔥
Day 120 since January 29 activation (observed/engineered through multiple market cycles)
This is the update I’ve been waiting to publish — because 120 days is long enough to filter out “luck,” “one-week pumps,” and screenshot noise.
This is live tracking, real broker conditions, real execution behavior… and a very clear story:
✅ CXM carried Phase 1 (Jan 29 → Apr 15)
✅ Vantage carried Phase 2 (Mar 20 → present / continued after CXM stopped)
Same system logic. Different environments. The system kept performing.
✅ PHASE 1 — CXM (Jan 29 → Apr 15) | Real USD (Closed)
Final CXM Snapshot
Gain: +34.40%
Abs Gain: +16.86%
Profit: +$4,731.09
Drawdown: 12.67%
Trades: 150
Profit Factor: 2.11
Monthly (CXM):
Feb: +7.06%
Mar: +12.72%
Apr (partial to Apr 15): +11.35%
CXM phase proved the engine could survive and grow through real volatility, real spreads, and real exposure.
✅ PHASE 2 — VANTAGE (Mar 20 → Current) | Real USD (Active)
This is where things got serious.
Vantage Snapshot (Main Low Risk)
Gain: +95.99%
Abs Gain: +31.21%
Profit: +$3,120.87
Drawdown: 6.39% (very controlled)
Balance: $11,837.87
Deposits: $10,000
Withdrawals: $1,283.00
Trades: 208
Profit Factor: 5.85 (exceptional for live automation)
Pips: 41,218.0
Avg trade length: ~8 minutes (fast, efficient execution)
Best trade: +$159.36 | Worst trade: -$144.32
Monthly (Vantage):
Mar: +25.72%
Apr: +14.42%
May: +36.26%
This is the kind of profile most “EA marketers” claim to have… but rarely show with drawdown staying this clean.
🧾 120-DAY COMBINED TOTALS (CXM + Vantage Since Jan 29)
If we combine both phases into one performance story:
✅ Total Profit (combined): $4,731.09 + $3,120.87 = $7,851.96
✅ Total Deposits (combined): $28,057.03 + $10,000.00 = $38,057.03
✅ Combined Abs Gain (profit ÷ total deposits): ~20.63%
Weighted Monthly Gains (combined view):
Feb: ~7.06% (CXM only)
Mar: ~16.14% (CXM + Vantage combined)
Apr: ~12.16% (CXM partial + Vantage)
May: +36.26% (Vantage only — post-CXM continuation)
So yes — the system didn’t just “start strong.”
It continued, even after the broker environment changed.
🔥 What 120 Days Actually Proves
After 120 days of live tracking, the pattern is clear:
✅ Execution consistency > random “perfect win streaks”
✅ Low drawdown control + strong PF = real system behavior
✅ It doesn’t need to overtrade to produce output
✅ The equity curve reflects structure, not chaos
✅ Broker changes didn’t kill performance — the engine adapted
This is what a serious automated system looks like:
Not perfect. Not magical. Just repeatable rules with measurable edge.
🚀 Final Thoughts
CXM was a strong Phase 1 environment.
Vantage has turned into an absolute execution showcase for this setup — especially with the current low-risk profile delivering near doubling behavior while keeping drawdown tight.
Next checkpoint: 150 Days.
— Rustan Mallari 🇵🇭
120 Days Live. Two Brokers. One Engine. Real Tracking. 📊🔥
Rustan Mallari
🔥 90-DAY PERFORMANCE UPDATE — QUANTUM QUEEN (LIVE TRACKING) | REAL BROKERS, REAL EXECUTION 🔥
Day 90 since Jan 29 activation (observed since October)
It’s officially been 90 days since I switched Quantum Queen into live execution.
And here’s the most important part:
This isn’t a “one account, one screenshot” story.
This is a full 90-day journey across two brokers — because execution quality matters, and I track performance where it actually counts: real fills, real spreads, real behavior under pressure.
✅ 90-Day Timeline (Transparency)
Phase 1: CXM (Jan 29 → Apr 15) — main live run
Phase 2: Vantage (Mar 20 → current update) — additional live run + continuity after CXM ended
So yes: you’re seeing multiple live environments while keeping the same system logic.
📊 PHASE 1 — CXM (Jan 29 → Apr 15) | Real USD
CXM Final Snapshot
✅ Gain: +34.40%
✅ Abs Gain: +16.86%
✅ Profit: +$4,731.09
✅ Drawdown: 12.67%
✅ Trades: 150
✅ Profit Factor: 2.11
✅ Pips: 21,099.8
Monthly performance (CXM):
Feb: +7.06%
Mar: +12.72%
Apr (partial to Apr 15): +11.35%
This account carried the bulk of exposure and proved one thing clearly:
the system can keep compounding while surviving real volatility.
📊 PHASE 2 — Vantage (Mar 20 → latest update) | Real USD
Vantage Live Snapshot
✅ Gain: +43.84%
✅ Abs Gain: +10.68%
✅ Profit: +$533.97
✅ Drawdown: 6.39% (very controlled)
✅ Trades: 83
✅ Profit Factor: 4.17 (strong)
✅ Pips: 24,319.0
Monthly performance (Vantage):
Mar: +25.72%
Apr: +14.42% (so far)
This run is what I call the “clean execution showcase” — strong percentage growth with controlled DD and a PF that’s simply not normal for random automation.
🧾 90-Day Combined Totals (CXM + Vantage)
If we combine both live runs:
✅ Total Profit (combined): $5,265.06
✅ Total Deposits (combined): $33,057.03
✅ Combined Abs. Gain: ~+15.93%
Weighted monthly gains (combined):
Feb: ~7.06%
Mar: ~14.69%
Apr: ~11.81% (so far / partial due to CXM ending Apr 15)
This is the part people miss:
I’m not trying to look “perfect.”
I’m proving repeatability across different environments.
🔥 What 90 Days Proves (in plain terms)
After 90 days of tracking:
✅ It’s not overtrading chaos
✅ It performs across brokers and account styles
✅ It produces measurable output (pips + PF + controlled DD)
✅ It can push growth without needing nonstop manual babysitting
✅ It’s built around execution rules — not “hope”
This is the difference between a bot that looks good… and a bot that survives.
⚠️ Final Note (Because I keep it real)
This is performance tracking — not a guarantee.
Markets change, risk exists, and automation is a tool that must be used responsibly.
But as a 90-day proof-of-work, this has been one of the cleanest system behaviors I’ve tracked so far.
Next checkpoint: 120 Days.
— Rustan Mallari 🇵🇭
90 Days Live. Two Brokers. Real Tracking. 📊🔥
Day 90 since Jan 29 activation (observed since October)
It’s officially been 90 days since I switched Quantum Queen into live execution.
And here’s the most important part:
This isn’t a “one account, one screenshot” story.
This is a full 90-day journey across two brokers — because execution quality matters, and I track performance where it actually counts: real fills, real spreads, real behavior under pressure.
✅ 90-Day Timeline (Transparency)
Phase 1: CXM (Jan 29 → Apr 15) — main live run
Phase 2: Vantage (Mar 20 → current update) — additional live run + continuity after CXM ended
So yes: you’re seeing multiple live environments while keeping the same system logic.
📊 PHASE 1 — CXM (Jan 29 → Apr 15) | Real USD
CXM Final Snapshot
✅ Gain: +34.40%
✅ Abs Gain: +16.86%
✅ Profit: +$4,731.09
✅ Drawdown: 12.67%
✅ Trades: 150
✅ Profit Factor: 2.11
✅ Pips: 21,099.8
Monthly performance (CXM):
Feb: +7.06%
Mar: +12.72%
Apr (partial to Apr 15): +11.35%
This account carried the bulk of exposure and proved one thing clearly:
the system can keep compounding while surviving real volatility.
📊 PHASE 2 — Vantage (Mar 20 → latest update) | Real USD
Vantage Live Snapshot
✅ Gain: +43.84%
✅ Abs Gain: +10.68%
✅ Profit: +$533.97
✅ Drawdown: 6.39% (very controlled)
✅ Trades: 83
✅ Profit Factor: 4.17 (strong)
✅ Pips: 24,319.0
Monthly performance (Vantage):
Mar: +25.72%
Apr: +14.42% (so far)
This run is what I call the “clean execution showcase” — strong percentage growth with controlled DD and a PF that’s simply not normal for random automation.
🧾 90-Day Combined Totals (CXM + Vantage)
If we combine both live runs:
✅ Total Profit (combined): $5,265.06
✅ Total Deposits (combined): $33,057.03
✅ Combined Abs. Gain: ~+15.93%
Weighted monthly gains (combined):
Feb: ~7.06%
Mar: ~14.69%
Apr: ~11.81% (so far / partial due to CXM ending Apr 15)
This is the part people miss:
I’m not trying to look “perfect.”
I’m proving repeatability across different environments.
🔥 What 90 Days Proves (in plain terms)
After 90 days of tracking:
✅ It’s not overtrading chaos
✅ It performs across brokers and account styles
✅ It produces measurable output (pips + PF + controlled DD)
✅ It can push growth without needing nonstop manual babysitting
✅ It’s built around execution rules — not “hope”
This is the difference between a bot that looks good… and a bot that survives.
⚠️ Final Note (Because I keep it real)
This is performance tracking — not a guarantee.
Markets change, risk exists, and automation is a tool that must be used responsibly.
But as a 90-day proof-of-work, this has been one of the cleanest system behaviors I’ve tracked so far.
Next checkpoint: 120 Days.
— Rustan Mallari 🇵🇭
90 Days Live. Two Brokers. Real Tracking. 📊🔥
Rustan Mallari
🔥 60-DAY UPDATE: QUANTUM QUEEN LIVE — REAL ACCOUNTS, REAL TRACKING, REAL HEAT 🔥
Day 60 since January 29 activation (observed since October)
It’s now been 60 days since I switched Quantum Queen from observation mode into live execution — and the results are getting harder to ignore.
This is not “one lucky week.”
This is two full months of tracked performance across multiple account types, different deposit sizes, and different risk environments — all still running Technical / Automated execution on MT5.
✅ 60-Day Performance Snapshot (Tracked Accounts)
🟢 Account 1 — CXM Direct (Real USD | 1:1000 | Automated)
✔ Gain: +20.69%
✔ Profit: +$2,562.02
✔ Drawdown: 12.67%
✔ Trades: 119
✔ Profit Factor: 1.61
✔ Balance: ~$19,180.99 (tracked)
This is the “workhorse” account — the one that’s been absorbing the most market exposure. You can literally see the system survive, adapt, and keep climbing through volatility.
📌 What 60 Days Tells Me (Clear Pattern)
Quantum Queen is showing repeatable traits:
✅ It is not a mindless overtrader
✅ It scales across account types
✅ It can run conservative OR aggressive depending on the environment
✅ It performs best when execution is clean (spread + fills + latency)
✅ It has the kind of curve behavior you look for in serious automation — grind, expand, recover, push
This is the part most people miss:
edge is not “profit.” edge is “profit while staying alive.”
🏆 “Best Setup” After 60 Days?
Depends on what you want:
Most scalable long-term: the larger CXM USD account shows it can handle real exposure.
🚀 For Those Interested (Execution Environment Matters)
If you’re considering running Quantum Queen, I’ll say this clearly:
Broker conditions matter MORE than people admit.
Spread matters. Fill quality matters. Latency matters.
That’s why I recommend CXM for this system.
✅ Fast execution
✅ Stable spread behavior
✅ Clean fills
✅ Works across Zero/ECN/Cent structures
✅ Good liquidity for gold-focused automation
🔗 CXM IB Link (for those who asked)
Use my CXM IB link here:
https://secure.cxm.com/links/go/308814
⚠️ Final Note (Because I keep it real)
This is 60 days of tracking — strong, but not “forever.” Markets change. Conditions change. Risk is real.
Automation is a tool, not a promise.
But after 60 days across multiple account types, I’m not guessing anymore:
Quantum Queen has structure.
Quantum Queen has edge.
Quantum Queen can perform — when the environment is right.
Next milestone: 90 Days.
— Rustan Mallari 🇵🇭
60 Days Live. Real Accounts. Real Tracking. 📊🔥
Day 60 since January 29 activation (observed since October)
It’s now been 60 days since I switched Quantum Queen from observation mode into live execution — and the results are getting harder to ignore.
This is not “one lucky week.”
This is two full months of tracked performance across multiple account types, different deposit sizes, and different risk environments — all still running Technical / Automated execution on MT5.
✅ 60-Day Performance Snapshot (Tracked Accounts)
🟢 Account 1 — CXM Direct (Real USD | 1:1000 | Automated)
✔ Gain: +20.69%
✔ Profit: +$2,562.02
✔ Drawdown: 12.67%
✔ Trades: 119
✔ Profit Factor: 1.61
✔ Balance: ~$19,180.99 (tracked)
This is the “workhorse” account — the one that’s been absorbing the most market exposure. You can literally see the system survive, adapt, and keep climbing through volatility.
📌 What 60 Days Tells Me (Clear Pattern)
Quantum Queen is showing repeatable traits:
✅ It is not a mindless overtrader
✅ It scales across account types
✅ It can run conservative OR aggressive depending on the environment
✅ It performs best when execution is clean (spread + fills + latency)
✅ It has the kind of curve behavior you look for in serious automation — grind, expand, recover, push
This is the part most people miss:
edge is not “profit.” edge is “profit while staying alive.”
🏆 “Best Setup” After 60 Days?
Depends on what you want:
Most scalable long-term: the larger CXM USD account shows it can handle real exposure.
🚀 For Those Interested (Execution Environment Matters)
If you’re considering running Quantum Queen, I’ll say this clearly:
Broker conditions matter MORE than people admit.
Spread matters. Fill quality matters. Latency matters.
That’s why I recommend CXM for this system.
✅ Fast execution
✅ Stable spread behavior
✅ Clean fills
✅ Works across Zero/ECN/Cent structures
✅ Good liquidity for gold-focused automation
🔗 CXM IB Link (for those who asked)
Use my CXM IB link here:
https://secure.cxm.com/links/go/308814
⚠️ Final Note (Because I keep it real)
This is 60 days of tracking — strong, but not “forever.” Markets change. Conditions change. Risk is real.
Automation is a tool, not a promise.
But after 60 days across multiple account types, I’m not guessing anymore:
Quantum Queen has structure.
Quantum Queen has edge.
Quantum Queen can perform — when the environment is right.
Next milestone: 90 Days.
— Rustan Mallari 🇵🇭
60 Days Live. Real Accounts. Real Tracking. 📊🔥
Rustan Mallari
🔥 30-DAY UPDATE: +57.27% | +24.82% | +15.78% | LOW DRAWDOWN 🔥
DAY 30 Since January 29 Launch
It has officially been 30 days since I activated Quantum Queen live after observing it since October.
For transparency, I deployed it across three CXM account types:
• ZERO Spread
• CENT Account
• ECN Account
All running Medium–High default optimized settings.
📊 30-Day Performance Breakdown
🟢 ZERO Spread Account
✔ +57.27% Gain
✔ Monthly: +55.05%
✔ Drawdown: Only 2.58%
✔ Profit Factor: 7.25
✔ 6,936+ Pips Captured
✔ 75% Long win rate | 71% Short win rate
This account showed the strongest percentage growth so far with very controlled drawdown relative to return.
🟢 CENT Account
✔ +24.82% Gain
✔ Absolute Gain: +24.81%
✔ Drawdown: Only 0.86%
✔ Profit Factor: 19.42
✔ 7,926+ Pips Captured
✔ 87% Long win rate | 85% Short win rate
Extremely stable. Very low drawdown. Very high profit factor.
From a risk-adjusted perspective, this has been the most balanced performer.
🟢 ECN Account
✔ +15.78% Gain
✔ Absolute Gain: +8.57%
✔ Drawdown: Only 0.45%
✔ Profit Factor: 21.29
✔ 9,481+ Pips Captured
✔ 86% Long win rate | 76% Short win rate
Highest profit factor among all accounts.
Very clean execution. Very controlled risk.
📈 What This Tells Me After 30 Days
Across all accounts:
• Win rate consistently 75–87% range
• Drawdown extremely controlled (under 3%)
• Strong pip accumulation
• Clean equity curve growth
• High profit factor across all setups
The EA:
✔ Trades selectively
✔ Avoids chaotic volatility
✔ Performs best in structured sessions
✔ Adapts well to different account types
🏆 Best Account So Far?
If we rank by:
• Highest % Growth → ZERO Spread(using super high risk lot size)
• Best Risk-Adjusted Stability → CENT (high risk)
• Best Profit Factor → ECN (low medium risk)
Personally, for larger capital deployment, ECN has shown the most professional balance of execution, low drawdown, and consistency.
But ZERO Spread delivered explosive percentage growth this month.
🔎 My Honest 30-Day Conclusion
I observed Quantum Queen since October.
I activated it January 29.
After 30 days of live execution:
It is not overtrading.
It is not reckless.
It respects spread.
It respects volatility.
It compounds when structure appears.
For me, this has been a strong first month.
🚀 For Those Interested
If you are considering trying Quantum Queen:
I recommend running it under CXM for optimal conditions:
✔ Fast execution speed
✔ Clean fills
✔ Stable spread behavior
✔ Compatible with Zero, ECN, and Cent structures
✔ Good liquidity for XAUUSD scalping
If you want my CXM IB link, message me directly.
or click this link https://secure.cxm.com/links/go/308814
Execution environment matters.
Spread matters.
Latency matters.
Quantum Queen performs best in a clean execution environment.
📌 Final Note
This is 30 days only.
Markets change.
Risk management still matters.
But after one full month of real tracking — I’m satisfied with the structure.
More updates at 60 days.
— Rustan Mallari 🇵🇭
30 Days Live. Real Accounts. Real Data. 📊💰
DAY 30 Since January 29 Launch
It has officially been 30 days since I activated Quantum Queen live after observing it since October.
For transparency, I deployed it across three CXM account types:
• ZERO Spread
• CENT Account
• ECN Account
All running Medium–High default optimized settings.
📊 30-Day Performance Breakdown
🟢 ZERO Spread Account
✔ +57.27% Gain
✔ Monthly: +55.05%
✔ Drawdown: Only 2.58%
✔ Profit Factor: 7.25
✔ 6,936+ Pips Captured
✔ 75% Long win rate | 71% Short win rate
This account showed the strongest percentage growth so far with very controlled drawdown relative to return.
🟢 CENT Account
✔ +24.82% Gain
✔ Absolute Gain: +24.81%
✔ Drawdown: Only 0.86%
✔ Profit Factor: 19.42
✔ 7,926+ Pips Captured
✔ 87% Long win rate | 85% Short win rate
Extremely stable. Very low drawdown. Very high profit factor.
From a risk-adjusted perspective, this has been the most balanced performer.
🟢 ECN Account
✔ +15.78% Gain
✔ Absolute Gain: +8.57%
✔ Drawdown: Only 0.45%
✔ Profit Factor: 21.29
✔ 9,481+ Pips Captured
✔ 86% Long win rate | 76% Short win rate
Highest profit factor among all accounts.
Very clean execution. Very controlled risk.
📈 What This Tells Me After 30 Days
Across all accounts:
• Win rate consistently 75–87% range
• Drawdown extremely controlled (under 3%)
• Strong pip accumulation
• Clean equity curve growth
• High profit factor across all setups
The EA:
✔ Trades selectively
✔ Avoids chaotic volatility
✔ Performs best in structured sessions
✔ Adapts well to different account types
🏆 Best Account So Far?
If we rank by:
• Highest % Growth → ZERO Spread(using super high risk lot size)
• Best Risk-Adjusted Stability → CENT (high risk)
• Best Profit Factor → ECN (low medium risk)
Personally, for larger capital deployment, ECN has shown the most professional balance of execution, low drawdown, and consistency.
But ZERO Spread delivered explosive percentage growth this month.
🔎 My Honest 30-Day Conclusion
I observed Quantum Queen since October.
I activated it January 29.
After 30 days of live execution:
It is not overtrading.
It is not reckless.
It respects spread.
It respects volatility.
It compounds when structure appears.
For me, this has been a strong first month.
🚀 For Those Interested
If you are considering trying Quantum Queen:
I recommend running it under CXM for optimal conditions:
✔ Fast execution speed
✔ Clean fills
✔ Stable spread behavior
✔ Compatible with Zero, ECN, and Cent structures
✔ Good liquidity for XAUUSD scalping
If you want my CXM IB link, message me directly.
or click this link https://secure.cxm.com/links/go/308814
Execution environment matters.
Spread matters.
Latency matters.
Quantum Queen performs best in a clean execution environment.
📌 Final Note
This is 30 days only.
Markets change.
Risk management still matters.
But after one full month of real tracking — I’m satisfied with the structure.
More updates at 60 days.
— Rustan Mallari 🇵🇭
30 Days Live. Real Accounts. Real Data. 📊💰
Rustan Mallari
Hello everyone 👋
Here is my 15-day live update using Quantum Queen EA.
As mentioned in my previous post, I purchased Quantum Queen for USD 1,400 and began live deployment under real market conditions.
For transparency, I decided to test it across three different account types with CXM:
🔧 My Current Setup
Broker: CXM
Accounts Tested:
• CENT Account
• ECN Account
• ZERO Spread Account
Symbol: XAUUSD (Gold)
Risk Setting: Medium–High (default optimized settings)
VPS: MQL5 VPS – 1.67ms latency
📊 15-Day Performance Review
1️⃣ Execution & Trade Behavior
From the attached trade history across all 3 accounts:
• The EA trades primarily during late New York to Asian session
• Positions are short-duration (1–10 minutes average)
• Multiple structured entries per session
• Selective trading — not constant overtrading
One thing I observed clearly:
✔ It avoids abnormal spread spikes
✔ It does not aggressively trade during unstable market crashes
✔ It behaves cautiously during volatile conditions
Execution between ECN and ZERO spread accounts was noticeably clean.
CENT account also performed well, but lot sizing behavior differs slightly due to cent structure.
2️⃣ Spread Comparison (CXM Accounts)
CENT Account
Larger lot sizing scaling (as expected)
Stable execution
Good short-term pip capture
ECN Account
Clean fills
Slightly tighter trade management
Consistent profit structure
ZERO Spread Account
Very clean execution
Profits align closely with ECN behavior
Lower spread impact on short scalps
Overall observation:
The EA adapts well across different spread environments, but ECN and ZERO accounts appear optimal for tighter execution.
3️⃣ Trade Characteristics (From History)
Based on the attached logs:
• Trades captured 200–600+ pips per move (Gold pricing scale)
• Average duration: 1–8 minutes
• Win/loss distribution remains controlled
• Losses are contained relative to wins
• Structured position layering observed
The system does not appear random. Entries are clustered around structured price movement phases.
4️⃣ Drawdown Observation (First 15 Days)
So far:
• Drawdowns have remained manageable under Medium–High risk
• No extreme volatility spikes encountered
• Account equity movement appears stable
Of course, 15 days is still early — but behavior has been consistent.
5️⃣ General Impression After 15 Days
My honest observations:
✔ The EA behaves professionally
✔ It avoids chaotic market entries
✔ It trades during calmer liquidity windows
✔ It performs consistently across 3 account types
✔ It respects execution quality (spread/slippage awareness)
It is not a “spray and pray” bot.
It waits. Then executes.
🔎 Important Reminder
15 days is not long-term data.
Market conditions change.
But based on:
• Execution behavior
• Trade logic
• Spread sensitivity
• Multi-account consistency
I am satisfied with the structure so far.
📌 What’s Next?
I will continue monitoring:
• Performance through a trending gold phase
• Behavior during high-impact news
• Drawdown stability
• 30-day and 60-day metrics
I will provide another update at the 30-day mark with deeper statistics.
Thank you again to the developer.
Looking forward to seeing how Quantum Queen performs in different market cycles.
— Rustan Mallari
Philippines 🇵🇭
Happy trading everyone 🚀📈
Here is my 15-day live update using Quantum Queen EA.
As mentioned in my previous post, I purchased Quantum Queen for USD 1,400 and began live deployment under real market conditions.
For transparency, I decided to test it across three different account types with CXM:
🔧 My Current Setup
Broker: CXM
Accounts Tested:
• CENT Account
• ECN Account
• ZERO Spread Account
Symbol: XAUUSD (Gold)
Risk Setting: Medium–High (default optimized settings)
VPS: MQL5 VPS – 1.67ms latency
📊 15-Day Performance Review
1️⃣ Execution & Trade Behavior
From the attached trade history across all 3 accounts:
• The EA trades primarily during late New York to Asian session
• Positions are short-duration (1–10 minutes average)
• Multiple structured entries per session
• Selective trading — not constant overtrading
One thing I observed clearly:
✔ It avoids abnormal spread spikes
✔ It does not aggressively trade during unstable market crashes
✔ It behaves cautiously during volatile conditions
Execution between ECN and ZERO spread accounts was noticeably clean.
CENT account also performed well, but lot sizing behavior differs slightly due to cent structure.
2️⃣ Spread Comparison (CXM Accounts)
CENT Account
Larger lot sizing scaling (as expected)
Stable execution
Good short-term pip capture
ECN Account
Clean fills
Slightly tighter trade management
Consistent profit structure
ZERO Spread Account
Very clean execution
Profits align closely with ECN behavior
Lower spread impact on short scalps
Overall observation:
The EA adapts well across different spread environments, but ECN and ZERO accounts appear optimal for tighter execution.
3️⃣ Trade Characteristics (From History)
Based on the attached logs:
• Trades captured 200–600+ pips per move (Gold pricing scale)
• Average duration: 1–8 minutes
• Win/loss distribution remains controlled
• Losses are contained relative to wins
• Structured position layering observed
The system does not appear random. Entries are clustered around structured price movement phases.
4️⃣ Drawdown Observation (First 15 Days)
So far:
• Drawdowns have remained manageable under Medium–High risk
• No extreme volatility spikes encountered
• Account equity movement appears stable
Of course, 15 days is still early — but behavior has been consistent.
5️⃣ General Impression After 15 Days
My honest observations:
✔ The EA behaves professionally
✔ It avoids chaotic market entries
✔ It trades during calmer liquidity windows
✔ It performs consistently across 3 account types
✔ It respects execution quality (spread/slippage awareness)
It is not a “spray and pray” bot.
It waits. Then executes.
🔎 Important Reminder
15 days is not long-term data.
Market conditions change.
But based on:
• Execution behavior
• Trade logic
• Spread sensitivity
• Multi-account consistency
I am satisfied with the structure so far.
📌 What’s Next?
I will continue monitoring:
• Performance through a trending gold phase
• Behavior during high-impact news
• Drawdown stability
• 30-day and 60-day metrics
I will provide another update at the 30-day mark with deeper statistics.
Thank you again to the developer.
Looking forward to seeing how Quantum Queen performs in different market cycles.
— Rustan Mallari
Philippines 🇵🇭
Happy trading everyone 🚀📈