Sorry for the misunderstanding — this isn’t my video. I came across it and wanted to share. Full credit goes to @ProsperityAlgoSolutions. I’m just highlighting the video I came across. I’m a supporter and sincerely wish you continued success with your EA!
Abel Liu #: Sorry for the misunderstanding — this isn’t my video. I came across it and wanted to share. Full credit goes to @ProsperityAlgoSolutions. I’m just highlighting the video I came across. I’m a supporter and sincerely wish you continued success with your EA!
Thanks for bringing the video to me then ! It is not only independent but unsolicited as I don't know them !
I bought this EA (Expert Advisor) a month ago and have been losing money the whole time. I haven't traded for almost half a month, so the EA doesn't seem to be working for me.
Chun Kin Kan #: I bought this EA (Expert Advisor) a month ago and have been losing money the whole time. I haven't traded for almost half a month, so the EA doesn't seem to be working for me.
Hello, loosing money and not trading is not the same thing. Trade opportunities are rare, it's the professional way. Patience is key, I am myself investing big and still waiting after huge october earnings on Gold. Trades entered late september, that's why you missed the move of the year from 3700 to 4129 (see attached).
Chun Kin Kan #: I bought this EA (Expert Advisor) a month ago and have been losing money the whole time. I haven't traded for almost half a month, so the EA doesn't seem to be working for me.
Did you have this trade ? You see, being patient is the only requirement.
Remy Aime Rene Louat #: Did you have this trade ? You see, being patient is the only requirement.
Initially, I used it with other EAs, but this EA would automatically close out the other EAs' trades at a loss. So I didn't use it for about two weeks. Later, when testing it on a demo account, I opened a trade with the same signal as the author, but only one trade, while the author had six trades. My trade was still open, while the author's was closed, and that one trade has now yielded a huge profit. Also, it can't be used with USC accounts; hopefully, this can be updated.
Chun Kin Kan #: Initially, I used it with other EAs, but this EA would automatically close out the other EAs' trades at a loss. So I didn't use it for about two weeks. Later, when testing it on a demo account, I opened a trade with the same signal as the author, but only one trade, while the author had six trades. My trade was still open, while the author's was closed, and that one trade has now yielded a huge profit. Also, it can't be used with USC accounts; hopefully, this can be updated.
You are earning so big, as in your screenshot, feel happy ! I'm doing updates you just asked, USC is not a common base currency !
Chun Kin Kan #: Initially, I used it with other EAs, but this EA would automatically close out the other EAs' trades at a loss. So I didn't use it for about two weeks. Later, when testing it on a demo account, I opened a trade with the same signal as the author, but only one trade, while the author had six trades. My trade was still open, while the author's was closed, and that one trade has now yielded a huge profit. Also, it can't be used with USC accounts; hopefully, this can be updated.
Update done as requested sir. You can now use USC base currency and there will be no interference with other EAs.
Update on the 15/11 - Remy closed his trade manually on his Signal page (instead on relying on the EA). This trade happen on Gold (XAUUSD, 10/11/2025). He did this so his signal looks in profit while the actual trade ended in a break-even. This is considered manipulation and for those who are new out there, remember to always look at the algo trading percentage in signal page. If it is not 100%, there is a high chance of manipulation and start questioning the author. Unfortunately i cannot believe in this EA anymore, i tried but in the end the result and this manipulation does not sit well with me. For those needing screenshot of proof can reach out to me directly or review the FX blue performance profile for this EA on my dashboard (link in my profile description)
Abel Liu #: Update on the 15/11 - Remy closed his trade manually on his Signal page (instead on relying on the EA). This trade happen on Gold (XAUUSD, 10/11/2025). He did this so his signal looks in profit while the actual trade ended in a break-even. This is considered manipulation and for those who are new out there, remember to always look at the algo trading percentage in signal page. If it is not 100%, there is a high chance of manipulation and start questioning the author. Unfortunately i cannot believe in this EA anymore, i tried but in the end the result and this manipulation does not sit well with me. For those needing screenshot of proof can reach out to me directly or review the FX blue performance profile for this EA on my dashboard (link in my profile description)
Hello, please apologize for confusing you by closing manually a trade from the EA.
But I was transparent and told you immediately. I understand your frustration.
I had my own reasons for this trade, for this time I was right but this is not a general rule at all.
Remstone is the best EA ever published at MQL5 and we will make very big profits, I'm sure you will change your mind.
From my side, I won't close EA trades manually anymore because it is usually underperforming.
Update on the 15/11 - Remy closed his trade manually on his Signal page (instead on relying on the EA). This trade happen on Gold (XAUUSD, 10/11/2025). He did this so his signal looks in profit while the actual trade ended in a break-even. This is considered manipulation and for those who are new out there, remember to always look at the algo trading percentage in signal page. If it is not 100%, there is a high chance of manipulation and start questioning the author. Unfortunately i cannot believe in this EA anymore, i tried but in the end the result and this manipulation does not sit well with me. For those needing screenshot of proof can reach out to me directly or review the FX blue performance profile for this EA on my dashboard (link in my profile description)
After negociating very hard because of poor initial convictions, Abel obtained the lowest price among all customers.
Then he threated to put bad review if I don't refund him, while MQL5 products are not refundable. I attached proof of his threat.
Indeed it can be hard to wait for one year, but nobody can garantee faster results, it was said from the beginning in the EA description and I always warn people about it.
About manipulation, lucky is the one who is 100% sure if he is right or not to close.
My first customer had crazy big earnings in October from a trade opened in September. Abel started after him, but it will happen again :
Problem solved with Abel ✔️ We both over reacted. He has been very supportive at the beginning (see comments) so I wish him long term success with Remstone.
Abel Liu #: Update on the 15/11 - Remy closed his trade manually on his Signal page (instead on relying on the EA). This trade happen on Gold (XAUUSD, 10/11/2025). He did this so his signal looks in profit while the actual trade ended in a break-even. This is considered manipulation and for those who are new out there, remember to always look at the algo trading percentage in signal page. If it is not 100%, there is a high chance of manipulation and start questioning the author. Unfortunately i cannot believe in this EA anymore, i tried but in the end the result and this manipulation does not sit well with me. For those needing screenshot of proof can reach out to me directly or review the FX blue performance profile for this EA on my dashboard (link in my profile description)
Yes, me and Remy had some over-reaction on the recent manual trade. But I'm glad he came clean with it. My word manipulation may be abit too harsh and take that back. I will give this EA another chance and review again 2 months later to give the EA ample time to perform. I really do hope this EA will succeed (otherwise it will be my failed investment)
Abel Liu #: Yes, me and Remy had some over-reaction on the recent manual trade. But I'm glad he came clean with it. My word manipulation may be abit too harsh and take that back. I will give this EA another chance and review again 2 months later to give the EA ample time to perform. I really do hope this EA will succeed (otherwise it will be my failed investment)
Please allow Remstone 1 full year to expect performance, as for any other investment.
I attached the disclaimer of the description of my Expert Advisor, because it is not reasonable to expect better than earning every year.
A breakeven is not a loss, so don't worry you are in safe hands, take your time and enjoy the only institutionnal EA at MQL5.
Independent review of Remstone Expert Advisor by one of our verified users !
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-BbOtPFVW-Y
Thank you @Abel Liu
Independent review of Remstone Expert Advisor by one of our verified users !
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-BbOtPFVW-Y
Thank you @Abel Liu
Sorry for the misunderstanding — this isn’t my video. I came across it and wanted to share. Full credit goes to @ProsperityAlgoSolutions. I’m just highlighting the video I came across. I’m a supporter and sincerely wish you continued success with your EA!
Track record since 2018 of my previous company on FCA regulated broker :
https://www.darwinex.com/invest/ARF
Remstone Club real growth and drawdown without deposits and cashouts influence :
myfxbook .com/members/Remstone/remstone-club/11533513I bought this EA (Expert Advisor) a month ago and have been losing money the whole time. I haven't traded for almost half a month, so the EA doesn't seem to be working for me.
I bought this EA (Expert Advisor) a month ago and have been losing money the whole time. I haven't traded for almost half a month, so the EA doesn't seem to be working for me.
Today I found a funny "honest" review of Remstone by an illegal activation reseller (don't buy scam products here) :
https://cheaperforex.com/remstone-ea-mt5-honest-review-analysis/
This guy literally wrote a massive long test (20 minutes to read) to explain why it's too expensive for him !
Unfortunately after so much efforts, there are now many live and regulated accounts and performance is going better and better.
We are even in the process of creating Remstone Fund on Vantage UK.
I would be happy to give him a discount to help him to afford Remstone ! :-)
Did you have this trade ? You see, being patient is the only requirement.
Initially, I used it with other EAs, but this EA would automatically close out the other EAs' trades at a loss. So I didn't use it for about two weeks. Later, when testing it on a demo account, I opened a trade with the same signal as the author, but only one trade, while the author had six trades. My trade was still open, while the author's was closed, and that one trade has now yielded a huge profit. Also, it can't be used with USC accounts; hopefully, this can be updated.
Initially, I used it with other EAs, but this EA would automatically close out the other EAs' trades at a loss. So I didn't use it for about two weeks. Later, when testing it on a demo account, I opened a trade with the same signal as the author, but only one trade, while the author had six trades. My trade was still open, while the author's was closed, and that one trade has now yielded a huge profit. Also, it can't be used with USC accounts; hopefully, this can be updated.
Hello, and welcome to Remstone ! About activations, it depends on machine, not account.
Please contact MQL5 as I can't do anything from my side about activations.
Update on the 15/11 - Remy closed his trade manually on his Signal page (instead on relying on the EA). This trade happen on Gold (XAUUSD, 10/11/2025). He did this so his signal looks in profit while the actual trade ended in a break-even. This is considered manipulation and for those who are new out there, remember to always look at the algo trading percentage in signal page. If it is not 100%, there is a high chance of manipulation and start questioning the author. Unfortunately i cannot believe in this EA anymore, i tried but in the end the result and this manipulation does not sit well with me. For those needing screenshot of proof can reach out to me directly or review the FX blue performance profile for this EA on my dashboard (link in my profile description)
Hello, please apologize for confusing you by closing manually a trade from the EA.
But I was transparent and told you immediately. I understand your frustration.
I had my own reasons for this trade, for this time I was right but this is not a general rule at all.
Remstone is the best EA ever published at MQL5 and we will make very big profits, I'm sure you will change your mind.
From my side, I won't close EA trades manually anymore because it is usually underperforming.
Update on the 15/11 - Remy closed his trade manually on his Signal page (instead on relying on the EA). This trade happen on Gold (XAUUSD, 10/11/2025). He did this so his signal looks in profit while the actual trade ended in a break-even. This is considered manipulation and for those who are new out there, remember to always look at the algo trading percentage in signal page. If it is not 100%, there is a high chance of manipulation and start questioning the author. Unfortunately i cannot believe in this EA anymore, i tried but in the end the result and this manipulation does not sit well with me. For those needing screenshot of proof can reach out to me directly or review the FX blue performance profile for this EA on my dashboard (link in my profile description)
Yes, me and Remy had some over-reaction on the recent manual trade. But I'm glad he came clean with it. My word manipulation may be abit too harsh and take that back. I will give this EA another chance and review again 2 months later to give the EA ample time to perform. I really do hope this EA will succeed (otherwise it will be my failed investment)
Please allow Remstone 1 full year to expect performance, as for any other investment.
I attached the disclaimer of the description of my Expert Advisor, because it is not reasonable to expect better than earning every year.
A breakeven is not a loss, so don't worry you are in safe hands, take your time and enjoy the only institutionnal EA at MQL5.
Hello, as some people think manual trading is outperforming automated trading, it is FALSE.
Remstone Club at Startrader would have made more than 100% (compare yourself with backtests) this year if it was all closed by EA.
Just have a look at this example of huge Gold trade taken by a real MQL5 customer of Remstone here :
https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/2249585
And compare with a manual closure at Startrader here :
https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/2297797
So please stop believing that manual traders could outperform or that Remstone is semi-automated.
This manual closure was requested by a customer after a 69 K deposit, to not enter during running positions.
Remstone is a top notch fully-automated Expert Advisor. If you let it run you could have better results than myself.