Only users who purchased or rented the product can leave comments
Cristian Salute  
The EA itself is really very good, excellent strategy, excellent returns. Unfortunately, it's all nullified by the fact that in most cases, positions are only closed when the SL is hit, which always remains quite far from profits. This leads to the typical situation where it's more likely to close with negative or breakeven SLs, compared to those in profit. If, however, it's followed manually, the situation changes drastically, and almost all orders can be closed in profit (even substantial ones).

The SL and TP strategy should be improved... making it more "dynamic" (also based on the balance) and not simply tied to the number of pips of distance. Because it only takes one pip not reaching the line that moves the SL, and everything is nullified.

It's an excellent EA, but without this improvement, left alone, it goes into loss or, at best, breaks even. Followed manually, however, it's a profit monster.

I hope the author finds a way to optimize this aspect, and it would become a genuine "monster" even left unsupervised.
Abdul Jalil Mridah Jalil  
Cristian Salute #:
The EA itself is really very good, excellent strategy, excellent returns. Unfortunately, it's all nullified by the fact that in most cases, positions are only closed when the SL is hit, which always remains quite far from profits. This leads to the typical situation where it's more likely to close with negative or breakeven SLs, compared to those in profit. If, however, it's followed manually, the situation changes drastically, and almost all orders can be closed in profit (even substantial ones).

The SL and TP strategy should be improved... making it more "dynamic" (also based on the balance) and not simply tied to the number of pips of distance. Because it only takes one pip not reaching the line that moves the SL, and everything is nullified.

It's an excellent EA, but without this improvement, left alone, it goes into loss or, at best, breaks even. Followed manually, however, it's a profit monster.

I hope the author finds a way to optimize this aspect, and it would become a genuine "monster" even left unsupervised.
Will try this as per your suggestion. Thanks.
JPBLANC66   

Hello, I agree with the previous comment: some winning positions eventually reach the maximum loss threshold. There's undoubtedly a solution to consider. Aside from that, this AI works well. Thank you.

Cristian Salute  
Abdul Jalil Mridah Jalil #:
Will try this as per your suggestion. Thanks.
I was pleased to see that with the latest updates you immediately incorporated my advice! I really appreciate it.

I did some quick visual backtests and it seems that the trailing stop loss now tracks profit much more reactively and efficiently.

This should lead to a consistent increase in winning positions and average profits in general.

I'm trying it out in demo now, I'll let you know my thoughts and if I come up with any further improvements.

Great job, thank you!
Mario Jhorkaelf Valle Argueta  
Your EA is terrible; it's the worst investment you can make. It blew a $300 account and a $500 account with your recommended settings. It wins trades, but the losses are offset by the large losses. I don't understand how your backtest gave you that result. I really don't recommend it.
Abdul Jalil Mridah Jalil  
Mario Jhorkaelf Valle Argueta #:
Your EA is terrible; it's the worst investment you can make. It blew a $300 account and a $500 account with your recommended settings. It wins trades, but the losses are offset by the large losses. I don't understand how your backtest gave you that result. I really don't recommend it.
This has been happening for the Side way Market for the past few days, but you should have waited two or three months to give a proper review, as stated in the description. If you are giving a personal review, please wait for two to three months and take relatively less risk, hopefully you will achieve success through this.
Abdul Jalil Mridah Jalil  
Mario Jhorkaelf Valle Argueta #:
Your EA is terrible; it's the worst investment you can make. It blew a $300 account and a $500 account with your recommended settings. It wins trades, but the losses are offset by the large losses. I don't understand how your backtest gave you that result. I really don't recommend it.
There is a bit of a draw down. This has been happening for the Side way Market for the past few days, but you should have waited two or three months to give a proper review, as stated in the description. Is this your personal review or are you acting as someone's agent? If you are giving a personal review, please wait for two to three months and take relatively less risk, hopefully you will achieve success through this. Please give me the account numbers and investor passwords of your lost accounts. I want to check it.
Avenger 1994  
Taking losses after the new update, account balance left 30%, no sign of recovery. 
Abdul Jalil Mridah Jalil  
Mario Jhorkaelf Valle Argueta #:

¿Cuál es la configuración establecida para la nueva actualización?

s
spyzee  


Golden Flow EA brought me similar results today.
(2025.01.06.)
And even more....
Today AQUA Funded Phase 2 did it.
I also did Phase 1 with it.
The Live account starts tomorrow.
I'm satisfied with the EA's performance.
Here are my settings, if it helps anyone.
I opened the last $0.72 trade by accident.
I'm not taking sides, I'm just sharing my experiences.
spyzee  
spyzee #:


Golden Flow EA brought me similar results today.
(2025.01.06.)
And even more....
Today AQUA Funded Phase 2 did it.
I also did Phase 1 with it.
The Live account starts tomorrow.

I'm satisfied with the EA's performance.
Here are my settings, if it helps anyone.
I don't use a VPS.
It runs on a MiniPc with 500MBit/s internet.

I opened the last $0.72 trade by accident.
I'm not taking sides, I'm just sharing my experiences.


.

Cristian Salute  
I'm really curious to know what the "Condition updates"—which are practically monthly—are actually for. As someone mentioned previously, they also seem to me like they're just there to dress up the backtest. Having had it for a while, I can confirm that the performance after October 2025 isn't what you see in the backtest.

I've had this EA for some time now (from october 2025) and I can confirm that the real-world performance is closer to that of the live signal than the backtest. Live signal is honest, backtest... less.

Live Signal
Only users who purchased or rented the product can leave comments