Only users who purchased or rented the product can leave comments
Sergey Porphiryev  
Roboforex backtests

version 1.1:
v1.1


version 1.2:
 v1.2

1st version don't have a DrawDawns
2nd - shows unprofitble year, which is unacceptable
Sergey Porphiryev  
TickMill backtest version 1.2:
TickMill v1.2

Such radical differences in backtests between different brokers is a clear sign that these backtests are not reliable for building expectations for the trading results of the advisor... And real trades can differ radically from the test results...
Sergey Porphiryev  
FxPro backtest (version 1.2):
fxPro v1.2

it feels like we're seeing one or two (depending on luck) miracles in five years against the backdrop of random chaos
Mikita Kurnevich  
The difference may be due to a large difference in the spread or due to the difference in the quality of quotes provided by the broker for testing
Sergey Porphiryev  
Mikita Kurnevich #:
The difference may be due to a large difference in the spread or due to the difference in the quality of quotes provided by the broker for testing

This does not change the fact that so "radical differences in backtests between different brokers is a clear sign that these backtests are not reliable for building expectations for the trading results of the advisor... And real trades can differ radically from the test results..."

This means that the data that you relied on when building the advisor were not relevant... and the advisor is a spherical horse in a vacuum or another pig in a poke... or an invitation to play Russian roulette with a deposit...

Only users who purchased or rented the product can leave comments