Golden Nuggets

Lucky me—I subscribed to this signal in exactly the month it completely went down the drain. Let’s start with the objective facts: the provider clearly states in the description that this is a grid system, and also mentions that copying the XAUUSD+ signal may cause issues. It’s all there in plain sight, so nobody really has an excuse to complain about that in their reviews.

My broker does offer XAUUSD+, so the trades were copied properly on my end. Slippage is a minor issue for me, but nothing dramatic. That’s where the 2/5 comes from.

What *is* a problem, however, is that the bot running in the background—and its handler—still send trades into the market without any stop-loss protection, despite multiple warning shots in the past. That’s grossly negligent toward subscribers and likely caused quite a few people serious pain today. These positions then remain open for days, happily accumulating swap fees, while the signal provider is presumably sitting in a back room, biting their nails and hoping the market eventually turns around.

With the sharp downward movements we’ve seen in recent days, subscribers had to learn the hard way that this system has no real answer to the current market conditions. My recommendation: keep your hands off this signal until proper risk management is finally implemented.

As for user support, I can’t comment—I haven’t needed to use it.

Rubbish signal without any SL

Loss after loss after loss. No profits for me on vantage. Very helpful tool to always trade in the wrong direction

run away poor fool

I do not recommend this trader at all. The strategy used here is clearly a grid strategy, opening multiple positions without proper risk control and relying on the market to eventually come back.

For the last two weeks the account has been consistently in loss, with more and more positions being added instead of managing the risk properly. This type of approach can look profitable for a short time, but when the market trends strongly, it can quickly destroy the account.

Another big problem is the complete lack of communication. The trader does not reply to messages, does not explain the strategy, and provides no updates to subscribers.

In my opinion, this is not a safe signal to follow. If you are thinking about subscribing, I strongly suggest staying away and avoiding it.

Fuck

Sadly doesn't work for XAU/USD only XAU/USD+ . Be cerrefull.

I've been subscribed for three months already, and the results are extremely good.

When an entry goes bad, it accepts loss before it gets too big (even if stop loss is set at a way more unfavorable price), but it recovers pretty fast on subsequent entries.

I trails stops very nicely, sometimes generating huge profit from a single position.

I have to say you may sweat on some cases, but the fact that it will accept a loss soon enough makes me trust the system.

Amazing job Laurent, keep up the good work! Thank you so much.

----------------------------

UPDATE: too good to be true. After several great months, the provider kept too many losing positions open for a long time, instead of accepting the loss early and moving forward, something that it didn't do before. I can't recommend this signal anymore.

Also, given that the provider hasn't withdrawn profits for a long time, I was not able to withdraw either, because I had the same balance. That is, given that it opens positions of 0.01 lot size it means my risks would be higher than the provider's in proportion to the account balance. Also the strategy would not map correctly on cases where the EA is using 0.04 lot sizes to average 0.01 positions, because I'd also have the 0.01 positions, but the bigger positions would be smaller.

I'm changing my rating to three stars (from five) because the yearly profits are still huge, but I won't follow anymore for the above reasons.

Slippage eliminates profit for me.

欢迎中国朋友一起跟单交流v hsudyu

The signal provider is a GAMBLER that liquidated my account on 29th January 2026 after I have subscribed to his signal services. His past performance is a result of the market UP trend, not the the provider skill! Zero Stop Loss! I have lost $1500! AVOID AVOID AVOID!

nao consigo copiar o sinal, minhas conta aparece o ativo XAUUSD e o sinal nao consegue ativar a operacao pois requer o ativo XAUUSD+. Como eu resolvo isso ?

I've been with this signal for 3 months now, as of end of February. It performed very well until last month's loss of ~20%, which unfortunately ate all my profits by that point as I had been adding funds (the growth was way more than 20% otherwise, so I would have stayed in good profit if I didn't add much funds shortly before the loss). However, no complaints from me about the provider limiting the loss. It was impossible to know whether the XAUUSD price would recover promptly or not, and going beyond 20% would increase the signal's all-time max drawdown. On a previous occasion, a GBPUSD grid was in significant equity drawdown, but the provider managed to fully cover it with profit from XAUUSD trades closed the same minute as stopping the GBPUSD grid, so no one is complaining here. This is trading, and there's risk of losses - often avoided but sometimes not. Now it's been another 3 weeks, and I'm in profit again. Edit: but further trading in March removed the profit again (considering the current equity drawdown on March 17).

The signal description makes it clear that grids are used, so I don't quite get people complaining about this in reviews. It's this signal's advantage compared to some other grid signals that loss is limited - those other signals could just blow the account. For practical purposes a ~20% account-level stop-loss for grids is not different from a similar stop-loss level for individual non-grid trades with other strategies. Like many, I also favor non-grid strategies, but (as long as loss is similarly limited in either case) that's mostly because good non-grid entries can be more profitable due to larger trades (per same potential loss), whereas the grid achieves larger cumulative trades (and partially larger rewards) only when things start to go wrong. But I digress.

I rate trade system reliability and description quality 4/5. Not 5/5 because this involves grids and 20% is a lot (yet I understand that a tighter stop level would likely cut the profits badly, so this should probably stay as-is) and because there's no description of the specific strategies. As I understand it's multiple EAs, at least one of which is also run on many other signals (but Golden Nuggets now seems to restrict the trading times more, favoring safety over profits). Some non-grid EAs appear to have been added recently, with smaller trades for now and sometimes incurring losses (which is fine). The description also doesn't specify a stop-loss level, so we just have to be guessing from the precedent that there's likely intent not to let maximum drawdown increase, instead occasionally accepting losses within that range. It would have been great to have this said explicitly.

I appreciated the slow recovery with smaller trades in the increased gold volatility in early February, attempting to avoid risking increase of the balance drawdown significantly beyond 20%. This keeps this signal reliable despite of the grids.

Trade copying quality is also 4/5. Some trades are closed just above break-even per the history here, whereas in some of those cases I have a slight loss. This may be limited to trades by the popular grid EA mentioned above as the price tends to move significantly the second it trades. I see no such problem with the non-grid trades added recently.

As to others complaining about the XAUUSD+ symbol, I saw no issue at all even though my broker does not have this symbol - it only has XAUUSD without a suffix. Reading up on MT5 symbol mappings, my understanding is that the problem occurs when one's broker not only lacks XAUUSD+ (with the plus sign), but instead has more than one symbol with name starting XAUUSD (so MT5 gives up on mapping as it doesn't know which one of several symbols to choose). So my advice is to check that you either have XAUUSD+ or (more commonly) have only one other XAUUSD symbol (not more than one). The name GOLD should also work as a documented hard-coded special case, if you happen to have that.

I rate user support 2/5. I didn't need nor ask literally for support, but a direct message I sent 2 weeks ago still appears unread, so I assume that someone needing support wouldn't get it promptly if at all. I also wish the provider posted news updates - and not only when the signal is performing great, but also when there are losses and slow recovery. OTOH, very few signal providers do that, and I see the description has been edited to include guidance on symbol names/mapping similar to my paragraph above - this is helpful.

There's no formal rating for performance, but I'd rate it 3/5 because on one hand there was good growth if you follow for more than a month, but on the other the ratio of recent monthly growth (or lack thereof) vs. max drawdown is currently pretty bad.

Overall, this may or may not remain a solid signal, now (presumably) with greater manual supervision hopefully adequate for the amount of subscribers' funds managed. With a monthly profit target in tens of percent risk can't be low, but that's as expected. It remains to be seen whether the signal will also become profitable again now that the market conditions have changed and different trading strategies are attempted.

Edits: I first wrote most of the above on Feb 23, then edited on Mar 7-17 to reflect my improved understanding and new developments (such as non-grid trades, edited description, unread direct message, and worsened performance).

As my 4th month of subscription is ending soon, I intend to leave this signal and will be watching its further development from a distance. I appreciate the experiments with new strategies and that they're done in a way limiting the losses, but a signal that isn't profitable over the latest month is just not good enough to be in my portfolio right now.

Dangerous grid

Dangerous grid

Not sure why last two trade didnt open trade at my account

Do not be fooled by the 1,163% growth shown on this signal. As a victim who lost $3,000, I am warning you about the technical illusion behind these numbers: Survival Bias: The statistics are only positive because Gold (XAUUSD) has been in a historic, continuous uptrend. This isn't professional trading; it’s simply 'buying and hoping.' The performance is a result of the market trend, not the vendor's skill. Zero Stop Loss: This strategy uses NO protection. It looks like a genius as long as the market goes up, but the moment the market reversed on January 29, 2026, the lack of risk management destroyed the accounts. Panic & Incompetence: On that specific day (2026.01.29), the vendor completely panicked. Instead of following a plan, he MANUALLY closed ALL trades simultaneously at 13:04 (Terminal Time) at the absolute bottom of the market. He locked in massive losses for all subscribers, only for the market to bounce back into profit just 5 minutes later! While the vendor has already secured his own profits ($3,259 in withdrawals), his subscribers faced total liquidation because of his emotional panic. This is a suicidal Grid/Martingale strategy masked by a bull market. Stay away if you value your capital!

grid prone to failure only copy if you withdraw regularly

Aw, it's my first month copy trading and hit a SL. Since it's a grid strategy, I wouldn't have closed the position myself at that level, it got liquidated at pretty much the lowest point, and right after closing, the price started rising again, it might have been set with a 20% hard SL, it's just bad luck for everyone. I do believe it will recover eventually, but my luck just doesn't seem suited for copy trading. Even though I lost over $1.2k, a neutral rating still seems appropriate. Wish you all the best.

Liquidated position，sad