YTGCCI reactions appear to be erlier -which is good - than the original CCI. Can you inform why is that?

Hi.

RU: Я применил к индикатору сглаживание методом скользящей средней.
      и добавил составляющую сравнения с историей

EN: I applied the moving average method to the indicator.
      and added a component of the comparison with the history

Thank you for answer. So moving average makes CCI less sensitive , but comparing to the history makes it more sensitive because levels appear "earlier" than in original CCI. Pls confirm - history influence the position of levels, and it makes it with ATR application.Is that correct? 

уровни изменчивы, не такие как в стандартном CCI

они фиксируют экстремумы индикатора через определенный период

The levels are changeable, not the same as in the standard CCI

they fix the extrema of the indicator after a certain period