RU: Я применил к индикатору сглаживание методом скользящей средней. и добавил составляющую сравнения с историей
EN: I applied the moving average method to the indicator. and added a component of the comparison with the history
Thank you for answer. So moving average makes CCI less sensitive , but comparing to the history makes it more sensitive because levels appear "earlier" than in original CCI. Pls confirm - history influence the position of levels, and it makes it with ATR application.Is that correct?
Thank you for answer. So moving average makes CCI less sensitive , but comparing to the history makes it more sensitive because levels appear "earlier" than in original CCI. Pls confirm - history influence the position of levels, and it makes it with ATR application.Is that correct?
уровни изменчивы, не такие как в стандартном CCI
они фиксируют экстремумы индикатора через определенный период
The levels are changeable, not the same as in the standard CCI
they fix the extrema of the indicator after a certain period
YTGCCI reactions appear to be erlier -which is good - than the original CCI. Can you inform why is that?
YTGCCI reactions appear to be erlier -which is good - than the original CCI. Can you inform why is that?
Hi.
RU: Я применил к индикатору сглаживание методом скользящей средней.
и добавил составляющую сравнения с историей
EN: I applied the moving average method to the indicator.
and added a component of the comparison with the history
Hi.
RU: Я применил к индикатору сглаживание методом скользящей средней.
и добавил составляющую сравнения с историей
EN: I applied the moving average method to the indicator.
and added a component of the comparison with the history
Thank you for answer. So moving average makes CCI less sensitive , but comparing to the history makes it more sensitive because levels appear "earlier" than in original CCI. Pls confirm - history influence the position of levels, and it makes it with ATR application.Is that correct?
Thank you for answer. So moving average makes CCI less sensitive , but comparing to the history makes it more sensitive because levels appear "earlier" than in original CCI. Pls confirm - history influence the position of levels, and it makes it with ATR application.Is that correct?
уровни изменчивы, не такие как в стандартном CCI
они фиксируют экстремумы индикатора через определенный период
The levels are changeable, not the same as in the standard CCI
they fix the extrema of the indicator after a certain period