
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I don't see any point in discussing the contents of the link. Firstly, it's the first thing I came across, nothing more, and secondly, there seems to be documentation there. But I don't want to waste time on it anyway.
Your "most likely" is no different than my "for sure".
It would be cool if the developers themselves answered, or at least someone who is actually in the subject.
Well there can't be no such basic things, there can't.
I don't see any point in discussing the contents of the link. Firstly, it's the first thing I came across, nothing more, and secondly, there seems to be documentation there. But I don't want to waste my time on it anyway.
It would be interesting to read the answer from the developers on this issue anyway.
And about the documentation... From everything I've looked through, there is only brief documentation on how to use the library. Detailed descriptions and comments, how it is organised inside, the scheme, etc., all this I personally did not meet.
Perhaps someone will want to study all this, understand it thoroughly and port it to MQL. That would be great. ))
I follow Anatoly's articles with great attention, what he does deserves respect.
In MQL programmes, the classic version of the interface is usually very poor, Anatoly shows how you can raise it to a proper height.
Secondly, his articles describe everything in great detail, sometimes it is more difficult than actually writing the code.
I consider his work as a very good teaching material.
And of course, it is possible to port something, actually not really penetrating and understanding how it is organised inside.
But when there is a problem after any "porting", and it happens, and something goes wrong, it is quite difficult to find the problem. That's why preference will be given to code that is transparent and well documented. And this is exactly the variant proposed.
And finally, if you take his example, compared to porting, which will take many times more time,
it's better to use his example than to scour the internet looking for a suitable variant.
and then to deal with problems after "unsuccessful porting", which involve importing megabytes of additional libraries, some of which may be without source code at all, worse described and may even involve the use of some DLLs.