Scripts: ClosePosition - page 4
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
You react strangely when you are clearly shown that the script doesn't work.
They can, you are just not in the subject.Hardly! Your code is like a rhinoceros in a china shop, it will just smash all positions and that's all, not close the required volume. Good luck.
fxsaber: everyone who is interested in your library is already using it, but it is not decent to impose it like this. The best is the enemy of the good.
The conversation is about nothing. In the context of this situation, the conversation was about a completely different problem. Why substitute concepts? As for the stock exchange, any codes cannot be infinitely universal. If it is so urgent for you, then flag in your hands, open a topic on the forum and develop it, who is stopping you?
You react strangely when you are clearly shown that the script doesn't work.
They can, you are just not in the subject.fxsaber: everyone who is interested in your library is already using it, but it is unseemly to impose it like this. The best is the enemy of the good.
Sometimes it is much more effective to convey an algorithm/thought by code than by its description. MQL4 code is the most understandable and concise. Using this syntax is 100% justified.
As for the Bible, it is mentioned only to remove the often heard "this is not MQL5".
Well, it was clearly demonstrated that the filling is filled incorrectly. Therefore, the sub-job will not work on many symbols on net accounts.
But you have the right to consider that all of the above is an indecent advertisement of bibla.
Sometimes it is much more effective to convey an algorithm/thought by code than by its description. MQL4 code is the most understandable and concise. The use of this syntax is 100% justified.
As for the Bible, it is mentioned only to remove the often heard "this is not MQL5".
Well, it was clearly demonstrated that the filling is filled incorrectly. Therefore, the sub-job will not work on many symbols on net accounts.
But you have the right to consider that all of the above is an indecent advertisement of bibla.
Sorry to be blunt, but that's exactly what it is, an annoying advert. Even if it's not crap, it's still an annoying advert, equal to this.
No problem! Crashed the post with the mention.
Please just let me know how to avoid annoying adverts in answers to questions or bug reports, so as not to lose the point and not to cause flooding?