Is it absolutely set in stone correctly validated that Elliot Wave 3 is never shorter than wave 1 and 5?
AnAcc9:
Yes, this is a true statement according to classical Elliott Wave Theory. Wave 3 is never the shortest of the three motive waves (1, 3, and 5). It can be shorter than either wave 1 or wave 5, but it cannot be shorter than both simultaneously.
Is it absolutely set in stone correctly validated that Elliot Wave 3 is NEVER shorter than wave 1 and 5?
Is that what is stated in the official rules for Elliot Waves?
Alexandr Saprykin #:
Yes, this is a true statement according to classical Elliott Wave Theory. Wave 3 is never the shortest of the three motive waves (1, 3, and 5). It can be shorter than either wave 1 or wave 5, but it cannot be shorter than both simultaneously.
Thank you
Yes, this is a true statement according to classical Elliott Wave Theory. Wave 3 is never the shortest of the three motive waves (1, 3, and 5). It can be shorter than either wave 1 or wave 5, but it cannot be shorter than both simultaneously.
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Is it absolutely set in stone correctly validated that Elliot Wave 3 is NEVER shorter than wave 1 and 5?
Is that what is stated in the official rules for Elliot Waves?