Is it absolutely set in stone correctly validated that Elliot Wave 3 is never shorter than wave 1 and 5?
AnAcc9:
Yes, this is a true statement according to classical Elliott Wave Theory. Wave 3 is never the shortest of the three motive waves (1, 3, and 5). It can be shorter than either wave 1 or wave 5, but it cannot be shorter than both simultaneously.
Is it absolutely set in stone correctly validated that Elliot Wave 3 is NEVER shorter than wave 1 and 5?
Is that what is stated in the official rules for Elliot Waves?
Alexandr Saprykin #:
Yes, this is a true statement according to classical Elliott Wave Theory. Wave 3 is never the shortest of the three motive waves (1, 3, and 5). It can be shorter than either wave 1 or wave 5, but it cannot be shorter than both simultaneously.
Thank you
Yes, this is a true statement according to classical Elliott Wave Theory. Wave 3 is never the shortest of the three motive waves (1, 3, and 5). It can be shorter than either wave 1 or wave 5, but it cannot be shorter than both simultaneously.
Is it absolutely set in stone correctly validated that Elliot Wave 3 is NEVER shorter than wave 1 and 5?
Is that what is stated in the official rules for Elliot Waves?