The genetic algorithm and its possible applications - page 10
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
In order to create, you need an idea. A concept of creation. You argue that it's not necessary. That it's enough to shake the "jar" with particles more violently and everything will build itself - the universe and living beings... Well, shake it, then...
Yes, shaking is a universal way to create something new. For instance, if a man and a woman shake the bed a bit, a new life will be born.
Yes, shaking is a universal way to create something new. For example, if a man and a woman shake the bed a little, a new life is born.)))
There's probably a law in the universe - everything starts with an Idea and ends with a mindless shaking... Art, for example, has proved it. Now the Market is proving it too... Next, biotechnology will prove...
And what is the complexity of systems created by "shaking"? This method is similar to the Rorschach test, where blots give birth to pictures. By the way, the real approach of modern artists is to splash paint on canvases, and "connoisseurs" will find something to admire themselves.)
Who cares, you don't believe me anyway.)
Any AO is just a certain way of sorting (search strategy), but the search is always in a LOCAL direction in the search space! If one can find the best result non-randomly, then one can construct an analytical formula and directly calculate the best value of the function, why do we need AO then?
Certainly there are serious results, I have told, optimization of a form at maximization of strength and minimization of volume, search of new materials with the set properties with construction of multidimensional crystal lattices, but it so, in a flash.
Any AO is just a certain way of sorting (search strategy), but the search always takes place in a LOCAL direction in the search space!
all it takes is poisoning the air and water to make the entire food base extinct, which man has been doing remarkably well lately. man can put on, roughly speaking, a gas mask, but birds and fish cannot.
viruses are rubbish! man is clever enough to make himself immune to infections and with regeneration and immortality like jellyfish, the only problem is man himself - by accidentally destroying all life on the planet man will become extinct (formally of course, in reality simply move to another suitable planet and start shitting there).
the funniest thing is that man can make his own food from almost anything, petroleum being the best, of course. so he does not particularly care about living food, non-living food is enough for him.
a perfect being is one who can modify his/her genome and create food from inanimate materials. humans are close to perfection. whether a perfect being needs morality is the question of a million.
Morality is paramount, only then survival, morality distinguishes us from animals.
gradient descent method
gradient descent is also a random direction search that does not guarantee finding the global maximum, the "gradient descent" search strategy is based on the assumption that the surface will continue to change in the same direction accordingly, so it is extremely bad for functions with sharp transitions, kinks and holes.
there is no point in using any AO, albeit gradient descent, if the extremum can be calculated analytically rather than iteratively.
Morality is paramount, only after survival, morality distinguishes us from animals.
Man, with his lauded "morality", is in fact worse than animals. look at your wife - no wolf would kill for a rabbit's skin, nor a rabbit for a wolf, no matter how much they hate each other or are afraid of each other.
No one in the animal world eats their own kind just for the sake of looking younger.
And what is the complexity of the systems created by "shaking"? This method is similar to the Rorschach test, where blotches give birth to paintings. By the way, the real approach of modern artists is to splash paint on canvases, and "connoisseurs" will find something to admire themselves.)