
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Peter's answers are like... is carried in all directions)
Brevity and meekness are the road to Infinity.
Thank you for your concern, Nikolai. There is nothing to worry about, as I have been doing this kind of intellectual work all my conscious life. This is research. As far as I know from you, you've been working on the AI problem yourself. And I believe you hold the unique key to understanding it.
And you seemed to think you possessed the unique key to understanding it.
Come on! What a key, just a modest elaboration.
I, too, have only a modest amount of experience. I just put them out there for the public to see. Maybe someone will come up with a valuable idea. :)
For example - inheritance. I didn't understand why I needed it before, but it turned out to be a real treasure!)
I doubt that OOP apologists fully understand it. I doubt that most of them fully understand what an Object is and why OOP offers distribution of data from the abstract to the concrete. How is it that Objects in OOP are constantly organized in a hierarchy? Why is this necessary? Unlikely, many will meaningfully answer.
I, too, have only a modest amount of experience. I just put them out there for the public to see. Maybe someone will come up with a valuable idea. :)
For example - inheritance. I didn't understand why I needed it before, but it turned out to be a real treasure!)
I doubt that OOP apologists fully understand it. I doubt that most of them fully understand what an Object is and why OOP offers distribution of data from the abstract to the concrete. How is it that Objects in OOP are constantly organized in a hierarchy? Why is this necessary? It is unlikely, many will meaningfully answer.
I, too, have only a modest amount of experience. I just put them out there for the public to see. Maybe someone will come up with a valuable idea. :)
For example - inheritance. I didn't understand why I needed it before, but it turned out to be a real treasure!)
I doubt that OOP apologists fully understand it. I doubt that most of them fully understand what an Object is and why OOP offers distribution of data from the abstract to the concrete. How is it that Objects in OOP are constantly organized in a hierarchy? Why is this necessary? Hardly, many people will meaningfully answer.
If someone does not understand something, it does not mean that everyone does not understand it either.
That's what we're talking about...
There is a limit to everything.
I found the problem with standard OOP:
OOP is invariant and is a natural property of Consciousness, but its implementation can be flawed.
There are languages that have dynamic objects - you can add properties on the fly. But they are slow. It is also possible to provide objects with this feature, but it will be slow.