A question for the funny and resourceful... - page 2

New comment
 
Anatolii Zainchkovskii:
A very greedy one won't be able to lose by default.
Interesting opinion, but I would be cautious about it... After all, psychology in trading hasn't been abolished yet...
 
Serqey Nikitin:

Don't be modest like a virgin and make innuendos...

Offer your options openly, honestly and without innuendo...

you are creating a second thread (the first one was taken down) offering your services...what are the understatements here?


 
Maxim Kuznetsov:

You are creating a second thread (the first one was taken down) offering your services...what's the problem here?


Are you always so biased...? If you can, answer only for yourself - How would you solve this problem if you had a time limit?
 
Serqey Nikitin:
How would you solve the problem if you had a time limit?
The problem could only be solved by 5% of people, even a smaller number, only 0.5 - 1%. That's a rumoured 5% who successfully trade. We do not take into account those who have tried and given up.
You only have a 0.5% chance of solving it.
 
Yuriy Asaulenko:
The problem can only be solved by 5% of people, even a smaller number, only 0.5 - 1%. That's a rumoured 5% who are successful traders. We do not count those who have tried to quit.
You only have a 0.5% chance of solving it.
So?... 0,5% of all traders is a large number... If even one person solved the problem, it is enough for us to be thoughtful about it.
 
Serqey Nikitin:
So?... 0.5% of all traders is a very big number... If even one person solved the problem, it's enough to be thoughtfully interested in these questions.
You can certainly be interested, but there is only 0.5% chance to solve it. And having solved it, to earn real money, when trading has a real sense (not as a hobby), it is even less. Well, and what is called getting rich, the chances become almost zero.
 
Yuriy Asaulenko:
It is certainly possible to be interested, but there is only a 0.5% chance of solving it. And having decided, to earn real money when trading has a real meaning (not a hobby), even less. Well, and what is called getting rich, the chances are almost zero.

It's a good thing this argument isn't important, as I solved this problem a long time ago.

...It is always possible to argue with a clever face that 0.5% is a pittance, which is not even worth messing with...

 
You take a particular kind of market, you study it for five years, like in uni, in the process of studying you learn TA, FA, Metatrader 4/5, mql4/5, you create your own TS, maybe several, and you find yourself among the 5% who graduated and work in the profession
 
Serqey Nikitin:

It is good that this argument is not important as I solved this problem long ago.

...You can always argue with a clever face that 0.5% is a pittance and not even worth messing with...

I'm sure you're not alone or unique, and the issue has been solved for many here. ))
For the most part, it is not worth messing with. When other sources of income are more profitable than trading, trading makes no sense. And statistically, there are very few traders, even among the rich guys. Not the most profitable activity).
 
Denis Nikolaev:
You take a particular type of market, study it for five years, like in uni, in the process of studying you learn TA, FA, Metatrader 4/5, mql4/5, you create your own TS, maybe several and you find yourself among the 5% who graduated and work in the profession
If it were that simple, the figure of 0.5% (or 5% according to other sources) would increase threefold or more... But, alas... Even forex (since 1970) would have accumulated a lot of specialists... but, unfortunately, they are not visible...
1234567
New comment
Reason: