Until you are given a fully working version with some limitations, do not enter into an agreement with the contractor, if the contractor is unable to give you a fully working version with some limitations, it is unlikely they will be able to implement what you want
And go to hell.
A self-respecting contractor will not work for free "maybe they will". Unless a novice, who needs a portfolio, may agree. And then they say that there are only amateurs on the freelance market
A self-respecting performer will not work for free 'or they might get selected'. Unless a beginner, who needs a portfolio, would do it. And then they say that there are only amateurs in freelancing
Your opinion may also hold those who can not fully realize the task at hand. For this reason, we should not talk about self-respect, but about how to let the customer know that you can do the job.
A self-respecting performer will not work for free 'or they might get selected'. Unless a beginner, who needs a portfolio, would do it. And then they say that there are only amateurs in freelancing
Put a limit of three days, and the customer will find you anywhere, even in the woods)
And here, Artem, there are two extremes. Or just showing off, praising yourself and then failing, or waiting for the bourgeoisie to poke a finger. True, there is another option: the client looked at the proposed option with restrictions, realized that his idea is not worth anything and disappears altogether. And there is no way to fight it.
so it is better to make it clear right away that it's not worth it than to charge him money. The customer knows more about his TS than the contractor, if he has been using it for a long time. In the input parameters, he can specify anything he wants in the ToR, so as not to shine his profitable ones. I think so.
Until you are given a fully working version with some limitations, do not enter into an agreement with the contractor, if the contractor is unable to give you a fully working version with some limitations, it is unlikely they will be able to implement what you want
And go to hell.
And go to the woods.
Put a limit of three days, and the customer will find you anywhere, even in the woods)
And here, Artem, there are two extremes. Or just showing off, praising yourself and then failing, or waiting for the bourgeoisie to poke a finger. True, there is another option: the client looked at the proposed option with restrictions, realized that his idea is not worth anything and disappears altogether. And there is no way to fight it.
so it is better to make it clear right away that it's not worth it than to charge him money. The customer knows more about his TS than the contractor, if he has been using it for a long time. In the input parameters, he can specify anything he wants in the ToR, so as not to shine his profitable ones. I think so.
Put a limit of three days, and the customer will find you anywhere, even in the woods )
If 10 programmers do it right, 1 gets paid and the other 9 do not, the question is why did they work for free?
Put a limit of three days, and the customer will find you anywhere, even in the woods.)
well, you've paid him twice and found him again.
It is better to make it clear right away that the idea is not worth it than to charge him money.
If the programmer understands what makes money and what does not, why would the trader give up?
Well, well, they found two payoffs and found one more.
By the way, maybe they're looking for one of us to pay now. We don't know. Guys, come in))
By the way, maybe they're looking for one of us to pay now? We don't know. Guys, come in.)
If so, answer the question. If the Expert Advisor works as intended, why would the developer abandon the Expert Advisor after the trial period?
It is better to pay and use it as intended.
if 10 programmers get it right, 1 gets paid and the other 9 do not, the question is why did they work for free?
training never hurts, and such orders are often flashed