You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
An example of the calculation channel for EURUSD last week:
Nice, isn't it?
An example of the calculation channel for EURUSD last week:
Nice, isn't it?
I'm sick of it.
What the fuck are you drawing?
Once again, look carefully at the figure and don't say any conclusions out loud!!!
This is what I need to make sure of.
Every second I calculate the arithmetic mean of AMB(ABS(return))/T.
Here, at T -->to infinity, this value should become almost a constant. No? But, here's the question.
Towards zero this value will tend to be. Well, yes - a constant.
This value will tend towards zero. Well, yes - a constant.
No, for each currency pair this value is strictly its own - I have already checked on 2 different weeks for 6 pairs.
This speed is actually responsible for the volatility of the pair. For the swing, the amplitude of movement - whatever you want to call it.
Cool stuff. I used to set it the same for all pairs. Wrong... It happens...
No, for each currency pair this value is strictly its own - I have already checked on 2 different weeks for 6 pairs.
This speed is actually responsible for the volatility of the pair. For the swing, the amplitude of movement - whatever you want to call it.
Cool stuff. I used to set it the same for all pairs. Wrong... It happens...
naturally
because each pair has a different price.
like 0.9 and 1.8.
There's a difference of 2 times.
and the ruble should also jump by 1 millionth, it is not a realistic target, is it?
so it doesn't look much like volatility...
technical calculation error, no moreAn example of the calculation channel for EURUSD last week:
Nice, isn't it?
Nope, that's cool )))
Nope, that's cool ))))
Trading in a channel is always a good idea.
Alexey, I think you started to work on S1 and had some ideas to build channels on that timeframe. And then you gave up. Now you came back to the subject? Well done!
Nope, that's cool ))))
Is there a criterion for breaking the channel boundary?
Alexey, some collective farmers here (maybe even collective farm chairmen - it's hard for me to judge from their incoherent speech) claim that ACF is an accurate criterion of channel breakdown. Have you not tried it?
Nah, that's cool ))))
If you're going to do it...)