The flow is one for one EA. Eight EAs in an account will work without interfering with each other.
I find it strange that you still don't know this. It has been said many times, including by Renat.
The articles used to say that there is one flow per terminal and two EAs will compete. Of course a lot has changed since then, but we need information, not rumours. I don't see anything like that in the docs.
The product under discussion can be found on my profile. It's not perfect, but it worked well. The API for it was never written, because during the whole time of its existence it aroused interest of 2 people.
Official confirmation of 8 trading threads (+1 manual +1 for trailing, if I'm not mistaken) can be found in new build announcements here on the forum.
It is not perfect, but it worked well. No API was ever written for it, because in all the time it has existed, it has attracted the interest of two people.
Maybe just having an API would have attracted attention.
I also admit that MQ's silence on the possibility itself leads to a lack of demand. I've looked through the release notes and haven't found anything similar, although there is a lot of information - I could have missed it.
That's the grid closing, the market is very calm. It took 45 seconds
219:48:21.198 M_S GBPUSDf,M15: close #91431525 sell 0.20 GBPUSDf at 1.35309 at price 1.34521219:48:22.995 M_S GBPUSDf,M15: close #91423481 sell 0.19 GBPUSDf at 1.35404 at price 1.34528219:48:23.895 M_S GBPUSDf,M15: close #91418929 sell 0.18 GBPUSDf at 1.35578 at price 1.34528219:48:24.895 M_S GBPUSDf,M15: close #91410249 sell 0.17 GBPUSDf at 1.35639 at price 1.34529219:48:26.527 M_S GBPUSDf,M15: close #91397951 sell 0.01 GBPUSDf at 1.35659 at price 1.34528219:48:28.195 M_S GBPUSDf,M15: close #91379392 buy 0.07 GBPUSDf at 1.35249 at price 1.34514219:48:34.716 M_S GBPUSDf,M15: close #91375472 buy 0.06 GBPUSDf at 1.35131 at price 1.34513219:48:35.693 M_S GBPUSDf,M15: close #91349058 buy 0.01 GBPUSDf at 1.34983 at price 1.34513219:48:37.323 M_S GBPUSDf,M15: close #91257283 buy 0.04 GBPUSDf at 1.35300 at price 1.34513219:48:40.458 M_S GBPUSDf,M15: close #91204064 buy 0.01 GBPUSDf at 1.35241 at price 1.34515219:48:41.508 M_S GBPUSDf,M15: close #91198656 buy 0.02 GBPUSDf at 1.35230 at price 1.34513219:48:43.090 M_S GBPUSDf,M15: close #91197237 buy 0.01 GBPUSDf at 1.35192 at price 1.34512219:48:43.996 M_S GBPUSDf,M15: close #91196002 buy 0.01 GBPUSDf at 1.35136 at price 1.34512219:48:44.757 M_S GBPUSDf,M15: close #91175231 sell 0.15 GBPUSDf at 1.35220 at price 1.34528219:48:45.764 M_S GBPUSDf,M15: close #91158669 sell 0.14 GBPUSDf at 1.35353 at price 1.34528219:48:48.838 M_S GBPUSDf,M15: close #91149650 sell 0.01 GBPUSDf at 1.35737 at price 1.34528219:48:49.601 M_S GBPUSDf,M15: close #90954053 sell 0.01 GBPUSDf at 1.32844 at price 1.34528219:48:50.484 M_S GBPUSDf,M15: close #90843384 sell 0.01 GBPUSDf at 1.31773 at price 1.34528219:48:51.501 M_S GBPUSDf,M15: close #90801552 sell 0.01 GBPUSDf at 1.31739 at price 1.34528219:48:52.237 M_S GBPUSDf,M15: close #90686454 sell 0.01 GBPUSDf at 1.30642 at price 1.34528219:48:53.008 M_S GBPUSDf,M15: close #90592637 sell 0.01 GBPUSDf at 1.30365 at price 1.34528219:48:53.894 M_S GBPUSDf,M15: close #90534185 sell 0.07 GBPUSDf at 1.30229 at price 1.34528219:48:57.381 M_S GBPUSDf,M15: close #90526122 sell 0.01 GBPUSDf at 1.30274 at price 1.34528219:48:58.400 M_S GBPUSDf,M15: close #90393880 sell 0.01 GBPUSDf at 1.29491 at price 1.34528219:49:00.848 M_S GBPUSDf,M15: close #90325733 sell 0.04 GBPUSDf at 1.29064 at price 1.34528219:49:02.654 M_S GBPUSDf,M15: close #90321246 sell 0.03 GBPUSDf at 1.29121 at price 1.34528219:49:04.894 M_S GBPUSDf,M15: close #90318674 sell 0.01 GBPUSDf at 1.29223 at price 1.34528219:49:05.863 M_S GBPUSDf,M15: close #90229515 sell 0.01 GBPUSDf at 1.29100 at price 1.34528219:49:06.630 M_S GBPUSDf,M15: close #90226119 sell 0.01 GBPUSDf at 1.29138 at price 1.34528
The product we're discussing can be found in my profile. It's not perfect, but it worked well. I hadn't written an API for it, because only 2 people were interested in it during its existence.
It has piqued my interest, but only now. Because it's almost impossible to find anything good in the Market, and it's only like this, almost a direct link, that you can spot Work.
The API is bad. Doing "in the image and likeness"... MT5. Then you don't have to write documentation - it's already there!
It used to be written in articles that the flow was one per terminal and the two EAs would compete. A lot has certainly changed since then, but we need information, not rumours. I don't see anything similar in the docs.
The documentation doesn't include asynchrony up to 8 threads, the reasons are unknown to me. It actually appeared about three years ago. It seems to be working now, at least it was checked in February. Here is the history of the contest account under the conditions of which the volume of deals was limited by 50 lots, but the number of deals per one instrument was not limited. These were the conditions that required 8 EAs to work simultaneously on 8 charts. At the end of the story, when free funds became abundant, you can see that up to 8 trades of 50 lots were opened in one second.
with OnTrade via CustomEvent
I had an idea to create a downgrade - to remove the need for OnTradeTransaction in MT5 when dealing with OrderSendAsync. I didn't get around to it.
The flow is one for one EA. Eight EAs in an account will work without interfering with each other.
I find it strange that you still don't know this. It has been said many times, including by Renat.
The articles used to say that there is one flow per terminal and two EAs will compete. Of course a lot has changed since then, but we need information, not rumours. I don't see anything like that in the docs.
The product under discussion can be found on my profile.
It's not perfect, but it worked well. The API for it was never written, because during the whole time of its existence it aroused interest of 2 people.
Official confirmation of 8 trading threads (+1 manual +1 for trailing, if I'm not mistaken) can be found in new build announcements here on the forum.
It is not perfect, but it worked well. No API was ever written for it, because in all the time it has existed, it has attracted the interest of two people.
Maybe just having an API would have attracted attention.
I also admit that MQ's silence on the possibility itself leads to a lack of demand. I've looked through the release notes and haven't found anything similar, although there is a lot of information - I could have missed it.
That's the grid closing, the market is very calm. It took 45 seconds
That's the grid closing, the market is very calm. It took 45 seconds
The product we're discussing can be found in my profile.
It's not perfect, but it worked well. I hadn't written an API for it, because only 2 people were interested in it during its existence.
It has piqued my interest, but only now. Because it's almost impossible to find anything good in the Market, and it's only like this, almost a direct link, that you can spot Work.
The API is bad. Doing "in the image and likeness"... MT5. Then you don't have to write documentation - it's already there!
API is bad. Doing "in the image and likeness"... MT5. Then you don't have to write documentation - it's already there!
Maybe by API you mean exactly that. But why in the image of MT5? MT4.
It used to be written in articles that the flow was one per terminal and the two EAs would compete. A lot has certainly changed since then, but we need information, not rumours. I don't see anything similar in the docs.
Maybe by API this is what was meant. But why the likeness of MT5? MT4.
So there is no asynchronous API in 4. But I personally find it incomplete/uncomfortable in 5.
Forum on trading, automated trading systems and strategy testing
Why does Metaquotes slip MT5 instead of MT4?
fxsaber, 2017.09.25 15:44
I had an idea to create a downgrade - remove the need for OnTradeTransaction in MT5 when dealing with OrderSendAsync. Haven't got around to it.
HI Are the signals in MT5 copied via OrderSend or OrderSendAsync?