and wandering around randomly again... - page 9
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
That's amazing.
If a person says the simplest and ABSOLUTELY obvious things (like: two plus two equals four), what proof do you need?!
You have to use your brain sometime, don't you?
Maybe you see a mistake in what I said? Then show it to me.
You come up with your own theory and then say to everyone, "Prove to me that you can't make money on it".
Normally, the one who comes up with the theory has to prove it.
You've been making empty theories for months on this forum.
You cannot prove what you are saying with stead, monitoring or anything else.
talking to you is just a waste of time. just like it is a waste of time trying to find a system for earning money on the eagle. so please do not write anything, do not waste our time.
Holy crap. You are cooler than Perelman. At least Perelman had time to send in his work and then he gave up his Nobel Prize. You, on the other hand, throw the Nobel Prize in the trash, saying it was not needed.
But we won't let the talent die out.
No, no, no, no...
Right, that's unnecessary
(especially since I'm not going to post the info anyway
)
All the seats in the Nobel row are already taken, so one more laureate will come out in the light of the mcl saffits and we'll have to throw someone out of the picture already. I don't know whether Solzhenitsyn or Lama.
We should open a voting thread. The question is serious. The best among the best are fighting for places.
You write nonsense, not obvious things. you write that you can win at eagle.
You come up with your own theory and then say to everyone "prove to me that you can't make money on it".
Normally, the one who comes up with the theory has to prove it.
You've been making empty theories for months on this forum.
You cannot prove your words with stead, monitoring or anything else.
talking to you is just a waste of time. just like wasting time trying to find a system for earning money on the Orlyanka. so please do not write anything, do not waste our time.
I knew it
One flubber is empty... "from the ceiling"... on emotion
I knew it - NO error detected .
All the flubber is empty... "from the ceiling"... on emotion.
A troll is a blabbermouth, an empty talker and a chatterbox.
All you do is forum talk and theorizing, for months on the forum. You have yet to prove anything in practice.
You shouldn't do that. The young man here publishes interesting and unusual ideas that might provide food for thought for inquiring minds. After all, maybe this is just the case, when a brilliant man is not understood, because he is ahead of his time. And perhaps he is holding a grail in his hands, which many people dream about. It is quite possible that its essence is as simple as Columbus egg, while the difficulty was only in finding such a simple and elegant solution. As far as I can see, lot manipulation ensures positive profit when entering the market at random. What remains to be thought about is the mechanism of lot manipulation. A pity, of course, that he does not seem to have an expert in this system. A history test would have confirmed his words about the success of the TS he created.
How can you not respect yourself and trust your mind to believe in the genius of trivial nonsense?
Actually, it is theoretically possible to win at orljanka without martingale and infinite deposit, but, really, only in the limit. I have succeeded (on paper, of course), but the amount of winnings is not worth it.))
ZZY 5 years ago it was solved as an auxiliary problem. Now the technology has been lost, as it was no longer needed). In fact, the task was not how to win, but how to maximize the pleasure of limited funds).
If you come to the casino with a large sum and play a couple of times on the matrix, then, very likely, you will make a profit.
but you're not going to stop there. You're going to use martingale to make money. You'll go to the casino tomorrow and the day after that and so on...
The more you go to the casino, the more you'll increase the odds that you'll come to a point where you need to bet xxxxxx dollars, which you just don't have.
Why is there this effect that if you play mvrtingale a few times, you can make a few dollars.
If 1001 people in different corners of the world went to a casino that night, bringing a thousand quid with them, with the plan to win 1 quid and walk away,
then 1,000 of them would win a quid and one would lose $1,000.
It's already been explained that it's a lottery.
A troll is a blabbermouth, an empty talker and a chatterbox.
Argue
You shouldn't do that. The young man here publishes interesting and unusual ideas, which may give food for thought to inquisitive minds. After all, maybe it is just the case when a genius man is not understood because he is ahead of his time. And perhaps he is holding a grail in his hands, which many people dream about. It is quite possible that its essence is as simple as Columbus egg, while the difficulty was only in finding such a simple and elegant solution. As far as I can see, lot manipulation ensures positive profit when entering the market at random. What remains to be thought about is the mechanism of lot manipulation. A pity, of course, that he does not seem to have an expert in this system. A history test would have confirmed his words about the success of the TS he created.
Don't talk rubbish. No ideas. And he speaks not only about the markets, but about any process that has a movement, if it is not a curve like a corpse on the instrument, including the sb.
The market is not a sb. That's why you can assume some strategies with random entry but not random volumes.