Donald - Nathanson - page 2
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
only a moron would waste time on a roulette system
self-critical
...
any thoughts on how to prevent a long series of losing trades?
Why...? Is it beneath you to think about HOW to USE these long series...?
Why...? Is it beneath you to think about HOW TO USE these long series...?
no need to ask empty questions....
why?...as this particular strategy requires...using this series in any way is beyond the scope of this method's discussion...
it's about the Donald-Nathansan system in case you haven't figured it out yet...
Self-critical
))) In fact, I have nothing against the casino. If it's not a scam of course, and everything happens in a civilized and fair manner.
Gambling based on chance is one understandable pastime. The player buys variance, in civilised casinos the return is 98% (not because they are generous, but so profitable that the player returns).
But here's a system that guarantees a plus expectation, it's nonsense of course all games are designed so that the institution for a long distance is impossible to beat. How can you not understand such obvious things.
only a moron would waste time on a roulette system
really self-critical))... that's why i respect you... you're not ashamed to admit it....
but I think differently of course...
because the resemblance to roulette is obvious to me...
no need to ask empty questions....
It's about the Donald-Nathanson system, in case you haven't figured it out yet...
What you described in the first post, it doesn't make any sense at all.
Explain the Donald-Nathanson system to me.
What you described in the first post, it doesn't make any sense at all.
Explain the Donald-Nathanson thing.
That is, you posted your negative opinion (as a conclusion) in a thread without any understanding of what it's about
p.s. Go on the search engine -- there's a lot of explanations of what's what and how.
So you posted your negative opinion (as a conclusion) in the thread without understanding at all what it's about
No, incorrectly.
It said that something (not clear what) is proven mathematically, I asked what?
no need to ask empty questions....
why?...as this particular strategy requires...using this series in any way is beyond the scope of this method's discussion...
it's about the Donald-Natansan system in case you haven't figured it out yet...
А... Yeah, well... This strategy isn't about making money
What you described in the first post, it doesn't make any sense at all.
Just explain the Donald-Nathanson thing.
ok... it's very simple:
1. Always bet on red. (on buy for example).
2. When we win we lower the bet by 1, when we lose by 1 we raise it and so on.
3. if the rate reaches zero, we switch to black or leave it at a minimum level.
4. according to the law of the mathematical distribution, the longer make bets, the more results will take the form of a normal Gaussian curve, i.e. roughly 50/50 (win/loss).
5. making bets by such principle if stops and number of winning/losing are equal, profit is exactly 50% of all bets in the volume of one per bet.
i.e. if we have sl 50p and tp 50p, initial bet 1, total transactions of 1000, of which we won 500 and lost 500 we get a profit of 500*1, ie 50% of all bets in the unit rate.
and this is with zero mathematical expectation and normal distribution of random walk of win/loss.
this is mathematically proven...
If we did not use such a betting system with the same zero expectation, profit would be exactly = 0 as it should be with normal distribution...