Chatter about the MT5 strategy tester - page 13

 
Andrey Dik:
It is a pity that experience is not enough to compare with vision. Usually experience changes vision, and the opposite only happens in schizophrenics. You still haven't done the experience with links to the shared folder.
You're being rude again.
 
The whole question is to get rid of clones of the same information, which is not always needed by everyone, but because it takes up so much space, it is important to put it together in one place, which makes it possible to get rid of clones.
 
Yuriy Zaytsev:
You're being rude again.

I'm not being rude. You're like a child... I tell my son "don't slurp like a pig" and he starts crying, like "dad, why are you calling me names!" I explain to him that I don't call him names, "like" doesn't mean "eat".

So, do an experiment with references. Ahhhh, I get it... You don't know how to do links! Here, read this.

 
xxz:
After all, the whole question is what to get rid of clones of the same information that is not always all and needed, but from the fact that it takes up so much space is so important to group it in one place, which makes it possible to get rid of clones.

this is where the developers' answer came from!

In order to have write access to a resource, you have to create a manager - which will decide from which terminal to write the same TIC, which should be the ONLY one!


Imagine that the database - into which THIS very tick is written !!! - receives this tick from 100 or 20 terminals and practically at the same time!

try to answer - how to implement it!


So note - there is a tick and it caught 20 terminals and each of them rushed to write this tick to the total database!!!

what is done at this point ?

 
Yuriy Zaytsev:

In fact, no, we have seen quite competent answers from specialists who have been working with this for many years!


From Renat's answer I understood that he meant something completely different.

You understand that in that folder there are almost dead files just for backup and no active work with them is out of the question.

 
xxz:


From Renat's answer I understood that this is not what he meant.

You have to understand that there are almost dead files in that folder, just as a reserve, and there is no question of actively working with them.

No it isn't - read the above post
 
Yuriy Zaytsev:
no it doesn't - read the above post


No, it isn't.

The files in question are written to once when the terminal is closed.

Perhaps they are also updated when you start the tester and that's it. Here are all actions with these files!!!

Until the time of closing the terminal and the event of adding the accumulated history where quotes are stored is not important and no one wants to tamper with it in any way.

 
xxz:


No it is not.

The files in question are written to once when the terminal is closed.

Perhaps they are also updated when you start the tester and that's it. Here are all actions with these files!!!

Until the time of closing the terminal and the event of adding the accumulated history where quotes are stored is not important and no one wants to interfere in any way there.

STOP!

What if the terminal has not been unloaded for 5 months?

what if it stays 8 or 2?

 

Here's the specific data I have the terminal running a couple of hours ago.

Pound file 2017.hcc updated April 3, 2017, 0:14:58 - that means it's been a full day and no one has added anything to it in that time!!!

 
xxz:

Here's the specific data I have the terminal running a couple of hours ago.

Pound file 2017.hcc updated April 3, 2017, 0:14:58 - that means it's been a full 24 hours and no one has added anything to it in that time in any way !!!

you consider a special case ! ( a couple of hours )

and you broader - with options think - what if a month , what if 3 ?

Reason: