Golden Ratio - page 7

 
Maybe the fog will clear by morning? )))
 
Pavel Gotkevitch:
That's an incorrect statement. Especially since you didn't specify what kind of drawdown you were talking about. There are different drawdowns: current (or working), actual, relative, maximum, absolute.

In general, it's 6 pages of nothing but nothing. The results of trades - on the table! Then we will be able to more meaningfully discuss the matter.

Otherwise, as rightly pointed outDmitry Fedoseev, "....I can't see from here.
Why do you need the results? Well, the man has calculated - the average profit 62p, the average loss - 38. It all coincided with something. His idea of beauty. All right, let's celebrate.
 
Maxim Dmitrievsky:


How did you get 38, i.e. how did you measure the average deviation of the price from the open trade? If it really deviated on the average by 38 points towards profit, then the best take profit would be exactly 38 points instead of 62. And if we consider that during flat periods the price oscillates back and forth in a small range and +-30 points is the order of the day. And since you do not allow profit to go higher than 68, you get this ratio on the average, mainly because of curve signals to the wrong side. That's if the points are 5 digits, of course. But since you have given catastrophically little information and continue to mock people, you're certainly not going to make porridge with you.

P.S. 38 is just within the average of 62, and if you have a probability of TP triggering 50/50 then where will the average profit be? oh my god! at around 38 pips! Learn the theory of probability. And it doesn't matter how many digits these points are.


But if you shift your probability of winning trades to take profit, say 62 to 38 instead of 50 to 50, then you'll get 38 instead of 31, so your system earns at such characteristics. Is it earning? what is the profit factor, 1.63?
 
Yuriy Asaulenko:
Why do you need the results? Well, the man counted an average profit of 62p, an average loss of 38. It matched something in there. His idea of beauty. All right, let's celebrate.
I agree with you. Let us join him in celebrating the beautiful 62... and we'll just ignore the shameful 38 as an alien element.
[Deleted]  
Maxim Dmitrievsky:

and if you shift the probability of winning your trades a bit towards take profit, say 62 to 38 instead of 50 to 50, then you get 38 instead of 31, so your system earns at these attributes. Does it earn? What is the profit factor, 1.63?

Earns ... where did you get the figure 1.63... ?

I have a profit factor of 1.89

I will prepare and post the data on the trades ...

 
Itum:

Earns ... where did you get the figure 1.63... ?

I have a profit factor of 1.89

I will prepare and post the data on the trades ...


So the probability of your winning is 65%, in a 50% situation you would get 31 points of the average profit, and with a shifted probability it would be around 40 (including TP of 62 points) 62/100*65 = 40.3 This is if we take the average directly, but in real life a small deviation + - spread there, something else, so it came out 38. Pure coincidence in short.

 

Autoooooooooor, show me the results of the deals, if you please. I want to analyse it with my own eyes, but not your words to analyse it.

I also have a section in the TS, or rather the TS is built on this section, but I have done everything consciously and I manually set SL and TP, I want to look at your Grail, or rather its results).

 
Renat Akhtyamov #:

then 70, 35, 140, 105

TP=SL.

It was like that in '14.

Now the euro is slowly falling.

Your true, it's working.

But I think it will take off and wipe out all the profits with stops. 🤣🤣🤣

Hahaha