Abstract thinking
you can also be abstract
you can also be abstract
Could you describe in a nutshell what the vision actually is and how it relates to the market?
That was it in two words! Or rather in three)
I have a lot of sayings about money - "money doesn't smell", "it's not money that makes you happy", "money likes to count", etc.
Это вопрос на хорошего объема статью.
If very abstractly:
It is a multi-layered cake of a viscous consistency with different viscosity heights. The lower layers (shallow TFs) have less viscosity. They are all connected and mutually influence each other. If force is applied to any level, it moves out of equilibrium state (it naturally pulls both upper and lower layers with it). After the force ceases, there is an oscillatory movement towards an equilibrium point.
Each level (TF) has its own life.
Very simplified.
I think there are a lot of participants that have experience in the market, how would you describe the market in the abstract?
The market is a mechanism.
Its operating principle is simple, but not everybody understands it. If the gears of the clock gained consciousness, they would hardly be able to describe their existence to us in the abstract. Perhaps they would only tell us about the limited scope of their direct contact.
If the parts were to ask the inventor of clocks how their mechanism works, he would probably not tell the gears anything definite, lest the clock fall apart. After all, the self-consciousness of the parts can destroy the Whole.
It is not the abstract but the concrete representation of how the market works that has value.
P.S. And also - a concrete representation has to be right.
The market is a mechanism.
Its principle is simple, but not everyone understands it. If cogs of clock found consciousness, they would hardly be able to describe their existence to us abstractly. Perhaps they would only tell us about the limited scope of their direct contact.
If the parts were to ask the inventor of the clock how their mechanism works, he would probably not tell the gears anything definite so that the clock would not fall apart, for the self-consciousness of the parts can destroy the Whole.
It is not the abstract, but the concrete representation of how the market works that has value.
P.S. And also - a concrete representation has to be right.
So what exactly is this "specific market view"? Or what exactly is this "particular representation of the market"?
First, imagine an ordinary city market. Imagine two queues facing each other. The people at the head of the queue are betting with each other on where the other participants, who will bet after them, will move the price. Having bet, they step aside and wait. Behind them, others do the same. Every bet made determines the current price (no matter what). Thus, the price moves and it is up to each of the participants to decide when they will win or lose.
It is a very simplified model, but fundamentally correct.
First, imagine an ordinary city market. Imagine two queues facing each other. The people at the head of the queue are betting with each other on where the other participants, who will bet after them, will move the price. Having bet, they step aside and wait. Behind them, others do the same. Every bet that is made determines the current price (no matter what). So the price moves and it is up to each of the participants to decide when they will win or lose.
This is a very simplified model, but fundamentally correct.
Two people made a bet - one person bets that one person from the next pair will bet on rise and the other person on fall? What is the bet - which one of the two bets will go up and which one will go down?
And why should the price move, if at any moment there are only two participants of the market and one of them always goes up and the other always goes down (otherwise the bet would not work)?
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
You agree to website policy and terms of use