Any rookie question, so as not to clutter up the forum. Professionals, don't pass by. Nowhere without you - 6. - page 403

You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Point by point answer, sorry.
1 - programming genius?
2 - to be fair, nothing is superfluous except feces and other decay products (frank opinion, ready to start debating, but in another thread :) ).
3 - it all makes sense now. :)
4 - so true. I know. I got a bit "wrong" and typed with the "OrderSend" function.
Thank you for contributing to the "Function Bricks Parsing" template. :)
1. let's dispense with the sarcasm, shall we? It made your learning comfortable and easy. What's genius got to do with it?
2. Argumentative.
3. You don't understand a damn thing, judging by your comments in the code.
4. It happens.
On point 2, an example:
There are less unnecessary things
Here is an example of practical use of a custom function:
.
?Thank you.
So you have to apply the name of the function to use it, and the variable "r" itself is set to determine the value of that function!
Here's a little discovery for me! ^^
Thanks again, Yuri. :)
For a final clarification, this is possible:
Your examples are not correct. When you call a function that has parameters, you must give the values of those parameters in brackets, separated by commas. You should also know that not all the functions are assigned values. If the function type is void, it has no meaning and is intended to perform some action or calculate some variables. In the latter case, it is necessary to know the names of these variables, in order to use the results of this function.
The compiler will give you an error on this line that the variable is not declared.
you should at least do this:
On point 2, an example:
There are fewer unnecessary items
Sorry for the silly question, but why are you digging through the entire history to find the last closed order? You find the first one from the end and get right out, I guess.
Sorry for the silly question, but why are you digging through history to find the last closed order? You find the first one from the end and immediately exit, as I understand it.
There was once a discussion about a problem where the history was stored as the user sorted it. Hence (to be safe) the search is exactly like that.
The user can only sort the story visually, the position numbers in the story cannot be changed.
The user can only sort the story visually, the position numbers in the story cannot be changed.
Actually, one can only really hope for order in the tester.
Haven't noticed, but okay, I won't argue. Make the depth 10-20, should be enough. But the whole story... That's a bit much, in my opinion.
You just need to be more attentive, or don't be lazy to specify the variable type on each line, or put a comma instead of a semicolon. And in indicator calls variables must be defined, not just from a torch.
Here is an example, and then - on your own...
Although the second file seems to be ok, except for a dot in a variable name. No dots in variable names.