My EA's test results - what's the catch and illusion? - page 8
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
It's especially hilarious coming from a martinist )
My method of testing in MT4 is through buffers. I.e. I draw trade levels (open, SL and TP) as lines over the entire history. This is more clear, visual and practical, especially on H1 chart.
The tester itself is made in MT4 for advertising purposes and it's related to real trading .... as a thief to a sucker. Suffice it to look at the clause of the contract stating that prices ON GRAPHICS are approximate, and SPRED at times, really extends to 100 points(4 decimal places) !!!! in certain cases (I observed it myself, but it is rare), although usually the average jumps at large brokers (alfa bank, for example) from 3 to 13 points (5 digits after the point) in a sluggish market condition. Also, the number of errors from broker communication and"the price has changed" affects the real indicator, see errors in the meto-editor.
Once again, the most objective TESTER is the buffer lines drawn over the whole history. You can always make a clear and thorough analysis of the technical situation. With the caveat that there is NO history of the spread, i.e. its dimension at the time)))))
The topmistress seems to have been blown away... He's probably making millions by now-)-)-)
Given the enormity of the information, there is no doubt that he has already bought himself an island or even a mainland and does not do nonsense anymore))
Given the enormity of the information received, there is no doubt that he has already bought himself an island or even a mainland and is no longer doing nonsense))
Good afternoon.
I guess a lot of people are already going on holiday etc. But hopefully some experienced TRADERS will be able to give some critical feedback on my EA's testing results from 2007-2013.
Elementary....
- close stop
- timeframe higher than M1
- large testing period
I've done trillions that way in 0.7 years........
Take a couple of months on M1 and scatter....