Forget random quotes - page 3

New comment
 
HideYourRichess: In light of these miraculous insights, please tell me again (someone) that price is a function of time.

That's flubbing in this thread. Go back to the thread in which it was discussed and flub there as much as you like. Wasn't that a thread about the impossibility of making money from random quotes?

P.S. It doesn't seem to be.

 
avtomat:

Here, by the way, faa provides a vivid example of how insensitive one is until the moment of epiphany-consciousness....

Approximately the same is the case with denying the role of time as an independent variable -- It takes time to become aware of the role of time... ;) pun intended...

Some people are not able to realize that there is only one independent variable in the market - people. And the price is random only because we do not know the process by which it is formed. But not by virtue of the fact that it is a "perfect coin".
 
HideYourRichess: Some fail to realise that there is only one independent variable in the market - people.
If you know how to formalise this independent variable, start a new thread and tell others how you did it.
 
HideYourRichess:
Some people fail to realise that the only independent variable in the market is people. And the price is random only because we do not know the process by which it is formed. But not by virtue of the fact that it is a "perfect coin".

What difference does this make to the user?

Without knowing the reasons, and without being able to determine the patterns, is the process not random to such a user?

 
The "perfect coin" has nothing to do with it at all... It has nothing to do with people being an independent variable. Well, it's no use explaining it to you... perhaps not yet... but at this stage in your development you are immune to any arguments that do not agree with your beliefs... So I think it's pointless to continue further bickering on this subject.
 
HideYourRichess:
In light of these miraculous insights, please tell me again (someone) that the price depends on time.

Do you want the price chart to consist of just one bar which, once started, will never end? Like a tug of war or movement in a vertical channel (cup)?

Or will the price dependence on the volumes suit you? Are the volumes constant for all DTs or is their accuracy unsatisfactory?

 
Mathemat:
If you know how to formalise this independent variable, start a new thread and tell others how you did it.
It's like the joke about the drunk looking for a dropped coin under the streetlight because it's brighter there. :)
 
prikolnyjkent:

What difference does this make to the user?

Without knowing the causes, and without being able to identify the patterns, is the process not random to such a user?

There is a big difference, although both are called by the same word "accidental". They have different natures, hence different approaches to them.
 
yosuf:
Yusuf, have you heard of zeros and crosses?
 
yosuf:
Do you want the price chart to consist of just one bar which, once started, will never end? Like a tug-of-war or a move in a vertical channel (cup)?
God forbid, let the chart remain as it is. And let the tumbler remain a tumbler. I just don't understand why one really important variable is easily and completely unreasonably replaced by another one that is much less important.
12345678910...66
New comment
Reason: