Break-even interest

New comment
 

Please help me find a solution in the form of a formula/algorithm.
Given percentage levels(Fibonacci levels)

Levl_00= 0%
Levl_01= 23,6%
Levl_02= 38,2%
Levl_03= 50%
Levl_04= 61,8%
Levl_05= 76,4%
Levl_06= 100%
Levl_07= 123,6%

Let zero be the current price i.e. 1.5 and 100% be 1.7, number 100 (e.g. the price may be 1.55). If the price grows, we open orders at the levels that are going to sell.
We have to find the volume of the lot to be opened, so that when the price moves from any level to the lower one (ideally we set for how many levels lower) all accumulated losses would be covered and the initial lot would be used for profit.

 
-Aleks-:

Please help me find a solution in the form of a formula/algorithm.
Given percentage levels(Fibonacci levels)

Let zero be the current price i.e. 1.5 and 100% be 1.7, number 100 (e.g. the price may be 1.55). If the price grows, we open orders at the levels that are going to sell.
We have to find the volume of the lot to be opened, so that when the price moves from any level to the lower one (ideally we set for how many levels lower) all accumulated losses would be covered and the initial lot would be used for profit.

To do this you need to calculate the prices of all levels and start from them, there is a formula for averaging, take the lot from it and it will be the required volume ...
 
Vladimir Pastushak:
To do this you need to calculate the prices of all levels, and start from them, there is a formula for averaging, to derive a lot from it and it will be the required volume...
Yes, I have the calculation in Excel - for each level to find the breakeven lot is simple, but if the lot itself increases when losses are not covered - then there is a problem - and in the form of an algorithm it must be formalized ...
 

Dear Alex, I have long wanted to tell you that what matters for success is not the intensity of your efforts, but their right direction.

Although it is not relevant to your topic, the point I was trying to make, in case you didn't get it, is this: Look in the wrong place.

 
Stanislav Aksenov:

Dear Alex, what matters for success is not the intensity of your efforts, but their right direction.

Although this is not relevant to your topic, my point, in case you didn't get it, is: Look in the wrong place.

I don't like idle rubbish on a specific issue. I don't think it's up to you to decide in what direction I should develop my TCs.
 

This is the picture that emerged


ATR 2000
Pips 10000
Lot 1
Levl Levl % Price LossPoint Lot's
7 123,6 1,7472 0,0472 50,99
6 100 1,7 0,0472 25,50
5 76,4 1,6528 0,0292 15,52
4 61,8 1,6236 0,0236 8,47
3 50 1,6 0,0236 4,24
2 38,2 1,5764 0,0292 2,00
1 23,6 1,5472 0 1,00
0 1,5 0 107,71





 
In other words, at the level of 123.6 you have to open 107.71 lots (this is a multiplier) in order to break-even when reaching the 100 level.
 

But if you make the closure in two levels instead of one, you get a more acceptable result








Levl Levl % Price LossPoint Lot's 1lvl Lot's 2lvl
7 123,6 1,7472 0,0472 50,99 10,30
6 100 1,7 0,0472 25,50 7,72
5 76,4 1,6528 0,0292 15,52 5,67
4 61,8 1,6236 0,0236 8,47 3,84
3 50 1,6 0,0236 4,24 2,45
2 38,2 1,5764 0,0292 2,00 2,00
1 23,6 1,5472 0 1,00 1,00
0 1,5 0 1,5 -0,0472 0 0
Total: 107,71 32,98
 
-Aleks-:

But if you make the closure in two levels instead of one, you get a more acceptable result








Levl Levl % Price LossPoint Lot's 1lvl Lot's 2lvl
7 123,6 1,7472 0,0472 50,99 10,30
6 100 1,7 0,0472 25,50 7,72
5 76,4 1,6528 0,0292 15,52 5,67
4 61,8 1,6236 0,0236 8,47 3,84
3 50 1,6 0,0236 4,24 2,45
2 38,2 1,5764 0,0292 2,00 2,00
1 23,6 1,5472 0 1,00 1,00
0 1,5 0 1,5 -0,0472 0 0
Total: 107,71 32,98

-Aleks-:

I can tell you that I only did it more deliberately, with a good rebound that would overlap, the calculated lot would be enormous...

 
Vladimir Pastushak:

-Aleks-:

I can tell you that I only did it more thoughtfully, with a good no-backlash to overlap, the calculated lot would be enormous...

What do you mean "more deliberately"?
 
-Aleks-:
What do you mean by "more thoughtful"?
It means that no levels were used, a strategy was put in place and even the strategy didn't help... In a trend, the lot gets bigger
1234567
New comment
Reason: