Help me write an EA, thanks in advance - page 8 123456789101112131415...24 New comment [Deleted] 2012.05.25 06:38 #71 посмотрим что сова покажет на истории))) Roman Kutemov 2012.05.25 06:55 #72 Lucas_SPb: If you enter selectively, e.g. as Dimitri said by triangles or by time, e.g. in the US session, then it would be difficult to check in the tester. Europa 2012.05.25 06:57 #73 Lucas_SPb: Low profitability with the risk of losing the entire (large) deposit, as with all such TSOs Europa 2012.05.25 06:58 #74 Stells: It would be difficult to check in a tester. What is the difficulty? Roman Kutemov 2012.05.25 07:00 #75 Europa: What is the difficulty? try it ))) [Deleted] 2012.05.25 07:04 #76 Stells: If you enter selectively, e.g. as Dimitri said by triangles or by time, e.g. in the US session, It would be difficult to check in the tester. You can first play with the width of the channel for placing the orders, and then attach an entry on the triangles... [Deleted] 2012.05.25 07:25 #77 Lucas_SPb: You could play with the width of the channel first and then add a triangle entry... You can, it's like one of the tools, for example, if TP was equal to the channel width, you could already be out. edikjefimov 2012.05.25 07:27 #78 Screw triangles, they go from big to small and vice versa, it takes math. [Deleted] 2012.05.25 08:21 #79 edikjefimov: screw triangles, they turn from big to small and vice versa, you need some math here I'm going to throw in an advisor on your classic scheme!!!! edikjefimov 2012.05.25 08:25 #80 Lucas_SPb: I'm going to give you an advisor on your classic scheme!!!! The system is very simple, no indicator can compare to the exact science of mathematics, the main thing is to calculate accurately and cold 123456789101112131415...24 New comment
If you enter selectively, e.g. as Dimitri said by triangles or by time, e.g. in the US session,
then it would be difficult to check in the tester.
Low profitability with the risk of losing the entire (large) deposit, as with all such TSOs
It would be difficult to check in a tester.
What is the difficulty?
try it )))
If you enter selectively, e.g. as Dimitri said by triangles or by time, e.g. in the US session,
It would be difficult to check in the tester.
You could play with the width of the channel first and then add a triangle entry...
You can, it's like one of the tools, for example, if TP was equal to the channel width, you could already be out.
screw triangles, they turn from big to small and vice versa, you need some math here
I'm going to give you an advisor on your classic scheme!!!!
The system is very simple, no indicator can compare to the exact science of mathematics, the main thing is to calculate accurately and cold