
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Should we try a different formalisation methodology?
Here, any branch (even a branch about the imminent demise of the platform) naturally, one way or another, always comes up with the idea of connecting blondies and/or brutes to the coding process.
However, with enough skill, one does not interfere with the other (plugging in does not interfere with coding).
I'm trying. I am currently trying to code systems from the stove. That is, I rip out some principle that I rely on, simplify it outrageously and try to build a system on it.
I'm trying. I am currently trying to code systems from a stovepipe. That is, I pull out some principle that I rely on, simplify it outrageously and try to build a system on it.
Take the results of manual trading and adjust the rules to fit as many trades as possible. You can even write a piece of software that will check the results of the tester and the manual trade report.
This does NOT mean simplifying the model to a "finite state" in order to develop it further. It merely implies an exclusion that is knowingly irrelevant to it.
It is clear. But I don't know how to code e.g. "price has hit resistance".
It can be done by time e.g. price is in the range of 20 pips for more than 2 hours at a level of e.g. round number 1.3000 i.e. the range of 1.2990 and 1.3010.
Or if it has been in this range for n hours .....
It can be done by time e.g. price is in the range of 20 pips for more than 2 hours at a level of e.g. round number 1.3000 i.e. the range of 1.2990 and 1.3010.
Or it has been in this range for n hours .....
This price can hit the level for five minutes, roll back, and then do it again in an hour, two hours, a day. The circular level has nothing to do with it.
But it doesn't matter - everything is formalizable. The main thing is (pardon the pun) to see the main thing. Or call a blonde.
For fuck's sake! It's already been done a hundred times. I don't know about MT, but it's written and rewritten on miserable Metas.
===
I'm getting a little overextended here. So I'll write more sometime later...
There's been a lot of me around here. So I'll write more sometime later...
Peter, you're never too much. Usually it's the other way around. You puzzle the public and bail for a week or a month, previously berating everyone in clinical terms.
Lyosha! I'm not a hormonal freak, and my orientation is normal! But I'm weird! // that's me just in case... )))
Then change your name, get your wife back,
To whom?
- Why did you shave off your moustache, stupid?
- Who for?
(c) "The Diamond Hand"