Should we try a different formalisation methodology?
I'm trying. I am currently trying to code systems from the stovepipe. That is, I rip out some principle that I rely on, simplify it to an abomination and try to build a system on it.
Here, any branch (even a branch about the imminent demise of the platform) naturally, one way or another, always comes up with the idea of connecting blondies and/or brutes to the coding process.
However, with enough skill, one does not interfere with the other (plugging in does not interfere with coding).
TheXpert: I'm trying. I am currently trying to code systems from the stove. That is, I rip out some principle that I rely on, simplify it outrageously and try to build a system on it.
That's not what I mean. Remember the saying of the ancient sculptor Miron: - cut away everything superfluous? This does NOT mean simplifying the model to a "finite state" in order to develop it further. It simply means to exclude something that is not relevant to it.
TheXpert: I'm trying. I am currently trying to code systems from a stovepipe. That is, I pull out some principle that I rely on, simplify it outrageously and try to build a system on it.
Take the results of manual trading and adjust the rules to fit as many trades as possible. You can even write a piece of software that will check the results of the tester and the manual trade report.
Svinozavr: This does NOT mean simplifying the model to a "finite state" in order to develop it further. It merely implies an exclusion that is knowingly irrelevant to it.
It's understandable. But I don't know how to code for example "price has hit resistance".
TheXpert: It is clear. But I don't know how to code e.g. "price has hit resistance".
It can be done by time e.g. price is in the range of 20 pips for more than 2 hours at a level of e.g. round number 1.3000 i.e. the range of 1.2990 and 1.3010.
It can be done by time e.g. price is in the range of 20 pips for more than 2 hours at a level of e.g. round number 1.3000 i.e. the range of 1.2990 and 1.3010.
Or it has been in this range for n hours .....
This price can hit the level for five minutes, roll back, and then do it again in an hour, two hours, a day. The circular level has nothing to do with it.
But it doesn't matter - everything is formalizable. The main thing is (pardon the pun) to see the main thing. Or call a blonde.
For fuck's sake! It's already been done a hundred times. I don't know about MT, but it's written and rewritten on miserable Metas.
=== I'm getting a little overextended here. So I'll write more sometime later...
There's been a lot of me around here. So I'll write more sometime later...
Peter, you're never too much. Usually it's the other way around. You puzzle the public and bail for a week or a month, previously berating everyone in clinical terms.
Svinozavr: Lyosha! I'm not a hormonal freak, and my orientation is normal! But I'm weird! // that's me just in case... )))
Then change your name, get your wife back, and explain why the whole forum is so in love with you.
Should we try a different formalisation methodology?
Here, any branch (even a branch about the imminent demise of the platform) naturally, one way or another, always comes up with the idea of connecting blondies and/or brutes to the coding process.
However, with enough skill, one does not interfere with the other (plugging in does not interfere with coding).
I'm trying. I am currently trying to code systems from the stove. That is, I rip out some principle that I rely on, simplify it outrageously and try to build a system on it.
I'm trying. I am currently trying to code systems from a stovepipe. That is, I pull out some principle that I rely on, simplify it outrageously and try to build a system on it.
Take the results of manual trading and adjust the rules to fit as many trades as possible. You can even write a piece of software that will check the results of the tester and the manual trade report.
This does NOT mean simplifying the model to a "finite state" in order to develop it further. It merely implies an exclusion that is knowingly irrelevant to it.
It is clear. But I don't know how to code e.g. "price has hit resistance".
It can be done by time e.g. price is in the range of 20 pips for more than 2 hours at a level of e.g. round number 1.3000 i.e. the range of 1.2990 and 1.3010.
Or if it has been in this range for n hours .....
It can be done by time e.g. price is in the range of 20 pips for more than 2 hours at a level of e.g. round number 1.3000 i.e. the range of 1.2990 and 1.3010.
Or it has been in this range for n hours .....
This price can hit the level for five minutes, roll back, and then do it again in an hour, two hours, a day. The circular level has nothing to do with it.
But it doesn't matter - everything is formalizable. The main thing is (pardon the pun) to see the main thing. Or call a blonde.
For fuck's sake! It's already been done a hundred times. I don't know about MT, but it's written and rewritten on miserable Metas.
===
I'm getting a little overextended here. So I'll write more sometime later...
There's been a lot of me around here. So I'll write more sometime later...
Peter, you're never too much. Usually it's the other way around. You puzzle the public and bail for a week or a month, previously berating everyone in clinical terms.
Lyosha! I'm not a hormonal freak, and my orientation is normal! But I'm weird! // that's me just in case... )))
Then change your name, get your wife back,
To whom?
- Why did you shave off your moustache, stupid?
- Who for?
(c) "The Diamond Hand"