Mathemat: Then what will your tests have to do with it?
None. Take any TS. The variables are the numbers of entries. The left side of the regression is the profit and loss of TS. we need the statistics, at least 30 profits. We estimate. At the level of idea.
Why do you think that these particular tests are enough?
This is as arbitrary a construction as all econometric tests.
Did you manage to pass the test, or are you judging again without reading?
Why do you think these particular tests are enough?
Necessity, sufficiency - what lofty matters.
To begin with I would like to get at least some characteristics of the inputs. Maybe all the coefficients will be equal to each other? I had an Expert Advisor with 6 inputs but they were intricately correlated in some way, and I refused from Expert Advisors with many inputs.
By the way, if the inputs have a set of parameters, it is even more interesting.
We take the NS and draw samples of the letter "a" in different handwriting. We teach them to recognise the letter "a". And in kotir - what do we teach? After all, we need to highlight what we teach "head and shoulders" or something.
I've suggested to one of the coryphaei of NS to feed the NS input ZZ and teach it to recognize reversals. ZZ patterns can be bred a lot. But the coryphaeus has gone into the mire, not even an eye.
Allow the use of cookies to log in to the MQL5.com website.
Please enable the necessary setting in your browser, otherwise you will not be able to log in.
You are signed in. Two-factor authentication has been disabled. Set it up again and scan a new QR code, or continue with two-factor authentication disabled.
There is a logistical "regression"
Anyway, I've got it all figured out. I don't need any more answers.
Then what will your tests have to do with it?
This is as arbitrary a construction as all econometric tests.
Делаем регрессию:
Profit = s(1) * A0 + . c(n) * A(n)
We estimate the coefficients of this regression.
We obtain at once
probability that a particular coefficient is equal to zero. - we delete such an input
the probability that all the coefficients taken together are equal to zero
by ellipses we obtain correlation coefficients
perform the test for redundant inputs
Test for skipped inputs
carry out the test of stability of the coefficient values (evaluate the randomness of their change)
Why do you think these particular tests are enough?
I have the NS doing the classifications.
Why do you think that these particular tests are enough?
This is as arbitrary a construction as all econometric tests.
Did you manage to pass the test, or are you judging again without reading?
Why do you think these particular tests are enough?
Necessity, sufficiency - what lofty matters.
To begin with I would like to get at least some characteristics of the inputs. Maybe all the coefficients will be equal to each other? I had an Expert Advisor with 6 inputs but they were intricately correlated in some way, and I refused from Expert Advisors with many inputs.
By the way, if the inputs have a set of parameters, it is even more interesting.
Which classes, if you don't mind me asking?
Which classes, if it's not a secret?
Growing - Falling, and Don't know.
-1; 0; 1 :)
Maybe someone can explain to me.
We take the NS and draw samples of the letter "a" in different handwriting. We teach them to recognise the letter "a". And in kotir - what do we teach? After all, we need to highlight what we teach "head and shoulders" or something.
I've suggested to one of the coryphaei of NS to feed the NS input ZZ and teach it to recognize reversals. ZZ patterns can be bred a lot. But the coryphaeus has gone into the mire, not even an eye.