
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
There are two types of MA crossing:
1. Bottom up
2. From top to bottom
Maximising will not work because once a crossing has happened from bottom to top, the next one will only be from top to bottom. I.e. maximise them or not, and the result will be stable 50%/50%.
In this case, it may be more appropriate to take the convergence-divergence of MAs as an input.
this is just a possible option.
Have you ever read Grandpa Krylov's fable called Quartet? No matter how you guys sit down, you're not fit to be musicians.
The two cars are also alternately 50/50 likely to change places.
In this case, I'm talking about convergence-divergence, that is, the change in distance between two lines, not their intersection.
And stop your bullying - it's just unseemly.
How did you not realise that MA is just an example, it is clear that there is no useful information there..... It's just an example. It's about something else..... I just wonder what you think, who will try it?
just everybody's too lazy.
but it should work.
Well, how to make in the optimizer so that the value of the variable tends to zero.... when optimizing......I think at least????
I first normalise all input signals in the range -1, 1
after that I normalize them again with the activation function, so that everything that happens to go off-scale after the first activation is sure to stop in the range {-1,1}
only after that I feed it to the input of the neuron.
So you try all sorts of crap that doesn't contain any useful information. You can also take mersi as an assistant, because in his small-minded opinion it should work.
Relax
You're some kind of pervert. Why sleep with boorish people?
All normal people sleep with decent whores. At most with his wife.