FOREX - Trends, Forecasts and Implications (Episode 5: July 2011) - page 129 1...122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136...296 New comment Alexander Mostovnek 2011.07.13 20:21 #1281 strangerr: There is no interest in going down: Thank you. We need to start looking at volumes =) Лекарь Центозависимых 2011.07.13 20:29 #1282 Noterday: Thank you. We need to start studying the volumes =) Dak volumes increase on the rise and on the fall) as well as vice versa. And now they go down at the end of the session, everything is normal. Murad Ismayilov 2011.07.13 20:34 #1283 Noterday: Thank you. We need to start looking into volumes =) How many times has it been said that "volumes" in the terminal are a sham. Alexander Mostovnek 2011.07.13 20:35 #1284 No, I mean the logic, they don't just go back and forth. There are different patterns. 1) Steam goes up - volume goes down 2) Vapour goes up - volume goes down 3) Vapour goes down - volume goes up 4) Vapour goes down - volume goes down 5) Vapour in place - volume increases. 6) Vapour in place - volume decreases. 7) Vapour in place - volume in place. Anyway. It's a really cool thing, you just need to understand when what model and what it may lead to. Experts: e-PSI@MultiSET "Trees don't grow to Open order if price Alexander Mostovnek 2011.07.13 20:36 #1285 wmlab: How many times has it been said that "volumes" in the terminal are a sham. Candlestick frequency is actually informative too. [Deleted] 2011.07.13 20:48 #1286 Noterday: Thank you. We need to start studying the volumes =) Good idea, and it will eventually lead you to $50 a month for normal datafeed, or futures. Alexander Mostovnek 2011.07.13 21:15 #1287 Skyriver: Good idea, and it will eventually lead you to $50 a month for normal datafeed, or futures. You have to be well-rounded =) ZZZEROXXX 2011.07.13 21:17 #1288 Stranger do you have real volumes or MT volumes? Alexander Mostovnek 2011.07.13 21:21 #1289 Who's going to give the real ones? =)) artikul 2011.07.13 22:32 #1290 Sort of closing the day )))) 1...122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136...296 New comment
There is no interest in going down:
Thank you. We need to start studying the volumes =)
Thank you. We need to start looking into volumes =)
No, I mean the logic, they don't just go back and forth. There are different patterns.
1) Steam goes up - volume goes down
2) Vapour goes up - volume goes down
3) Vapour goes down - volume goes up
4) Vapour goes down - volume goes down
5) Vapour in place - volume increases.
6) Vapour in place - volume decreases.
7) Vapour in place - volume in place.
Anyway. It's a really cool thing, you just need to understand when what model and what it may lead to.
How many times has it been said that "volumes" in the terminal are a sham.
Thank you. We need to start studying the volumes =)
Good idea, and it will eventually lead you to $50 a month for normal datafeed, or futures.
You have to be well-rounded =)