averaging does not take the number of counts, but the actual number of counts when there was a change ... not the number of all counts - even when there was no change
trol222: I'm a watery, I'm a watery... someone should talk to me....))))
Slightly off-topic)). I was scalping and tried a dozen different brokerage firms. So, all of them have very different minutes, some of them are prickly, others are smooth, others are just slow. They often have price differences up to 30-100 points (on five digits). I do not understand how one can become a rider.
Well first of all I wrote there - for example minutes... you can take weeks and days and so on... and build a lot of these lines... The example is given for one pair - just thought that in calculation of MA, for example, from increments of separately plus and minus ones, someone does so (1+1+0+0+1+1)/6, but more correctly (1+1+0+0+1+1)/4, that is, the averaging period is floating ...
these are the differences so far
underneath - these are the reverse reconstructed ....
I'm a watery, I'm a watery... someone should talk to me....))))
Slightly off-topic)). I was scalping and tried a dozen different brokerage firms. So, all of them have very different minutes, some of them are prickly, others are smooth, others are just slow. They often have price differences up to 30-100 points (on five digits). I do not understand how one can become a rider.
So I do not understand how you can analyse them.
Just giving my opinion.....