The absurdity of a stop loss - page 17
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Wouldn't it be nice if you could draw an example of such a position...?
There are places where it is preferable to :
1. to have a long position,
2. to have a short position,
and there are
3. where it is better not to have any.
By turning around, you remove the third point and for nothing.
Wouldn't it be nice if you could draw an example of such a position...?
The euro drew in this morning. Below yesterday's low, it is preferable to have a short position.
Yes, today's day was not a good one even last night. )))
Yes, today's day didn't go well last night. )))
The euro drew in this morning. Below yesterday's low, it is preferable to have a short position.
Yesterday too.
Vladimir, don't try to muddy people's heads with mystery fog )
Draw a couple of simple and straightforward pictures with a graph, arrows and the words "here", "here" and "therema-sudema" and you will stop being tormented
Can we conclude from this that you are placing stops on the extremes of the daily candle?
Wouldn't it be nice if you could draw an example of such a position...?
The whole beauty is that knowing such a "highly probable" position, such a signal, you can only trade on the breakout, stop orders, the name of your own grab,
and since there isn't one, the "probability" of such signals is a very subjective question.
the whole beauty is that knowing such a "highly probable" position, such a signal, you can only trade on the breakthrough, stop orders, the name of your own grab,
and since there is none, the "probability" of such signals is a very subjective question