The market is a controlled dynamic system. - page 119 1...112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126...551 New comment Юсуфходжа 2013.09.28 18:20 #1181 avtomat: WRONG !!! For arbitrarily taken values of n and tau we see: YOU CANNOT TAKE THEM ARBITRARILY!!!!!!?????!!!! Take n τ 2,954197002 0,577292852 [Deleted] 2013.09.28 18:22 #1182 yosuf: The sums are the same. What is the problem? I have the parameters n and tau calculated strictly according to your formulas, but the result....... [Deleted] 2013.09.28 18:24 #1183 yosuf: YOU CANNOT TAKE THEM ARBITRARILY!!!!!!?????!!!! What does arbitrariness have to do with it? FUNCTIONS are different !!!! [Deleted] 2013.09.28 18:28 #1184 yosuf: YOU CANNOT TAKE THEM ARBITRARILY!!!!!!?????!!!! Take n τ 2,954197002 0,577292852 . See? Юсуфходжа 2013.09.28 18:35 #1185 avtomat: What's the catch? I have the parameters n and tau calculated strictly according to your formulas, but the result....... Actual data n T Present History Past Past + Nast = Past Future Past+Nast=Future Past+Nast+Future 1,32570 1,32870 2,95419700 0,577292852 0,158231643 0,261064018 0,10283238 0,261064023 0,738935982 4,90449E-09 1,000000005 1,33110 2,95419700 0,577292852 0,216920364 0,682256914 0,465336552 0,682256915 0,317743086 1,23986E-09 1,000000001 1,34200 2,95419700 0,577292852 0,127119937 0,895607484 0,768487551 0,895607488 0,104392516 4,36571E-09 1,000000004 Grail indicators Getting timeseries data from Multicurrency and multitimeframe indicators [Deleted] 2013.09.28 18:36 #1186 yosuf: The amounts match, why you have negative values, find out. The calculation is done strictly according to your formulas. You can see it in the picture. Юсуфходжа 2013.09.28 18:36 #1187 Where do you see the discrepancy? [Deleted] 2013.09.28 18:43 #1188 yosuf: Actual data n T Present History Past Past + Nast = Past Future Past + Nast = Future Past+Nast+Future 1,32570 1,32870 2,95419700 0,577292852 0,158231643 0,261064018 0,10283238 0,261064023 0,738935982 4,90449E-09 1,000000005 1,33110 2,95419700 0,577292852 0,216920364 0,682256914 0,465336552 0,682256915 0,317743086 1,23986E-09 1,000000001 1,34200 2,95419700 0,577292852 0,127119937 0,895607484 0,768487551 0,895607488 0,104392516 4,36571E-09 1,000000004 Why do you have t = 0.577292852 ? Everywhere, at all values, for different points. . From https://www.mql5.com/ru/articles/250 t1 = (h0 + h1)/2; t2 = (h1 + h2)/2; t3 = (h3 + h2)/2; and so on. . I have it like this: . yep, it's not t, it's tau... Юсуфходжа 2013.09.28 18:48 #1189 avtomat: Why do you have t = 0.577292852 ? . From https://www.mql5.com/ru/articles/250 i.e. the middle of the interval. . That's what I've got: Since the sums are the same and the calculation n is the same, the intervals are taken correctly. The error is only in the definition of t [Deleted] 2013.09.28 18:54 #1190 yosuf: Since the sums are the same and the calculation n is the same, the intervals are taken correctly. The error is only in the definition of t do not coincide --- n is negative. 1...112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126...551 New comment
WRONG !!!
For arbitrarily taken values of n and tau we see:
YOU CANNOT TAKE THEM ARBITRARILY!!!!!!?????!!!!
Take
The sums are the same.
What is the problem?
I have the parameters n and tau calculated strictly according to your formulas, but the result.......
YOU CANNOT TAKE THEM ARBITRARILY!!!!!!?????!!!!
What does arbitrariness have to do with it?
FUNCTIONS are different !!!!
YOU CANNOT TAKE THEM ARBITRARILY!!!!!!?????!!!!
Take
.
See?
What's the catch?
I have the parameters n and tau calculated strictly according to your formulas, but the result.......
The amounts match, why you have negative values, find out.
The calculation is done strictly according to your formulas. You can see it in the picture.
Why do you have t = 0.577292852 ? Everywhere, at all values, for different points.
.
From https://www.mql5.com/ru/articles/250
t1 = (h0 + h1)/2; t2 = (h1 + h2)/2; t3 = (h3 + h2)/2; and so on.
.
I have it like this:
.
yep, it's not t, it's tau...
Why do you have t = 0.577292852 ?
.
From https://www.mql5.com/ru/articles/250
i.e. the middle of the interval.
.
That's what I've got:
Since the sums are the same and the calculation n is the same, the intervals are taken correctly. The error is only in the definition of t
do not coincide --- n is negative.