The market is a controlled dynamic system. - page 110
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I'm more confused by the concepts themselves.) How can the past be added to something?
I agree.What's missing is another concept - "the afterlife".
Really confusing, I would say more so - all mysticism.
What is missing is tambourine and incantations as a functional link between these 'terms'.
And aren't the universally accepted categories and concepts from TAU enough to get the point across?
For example:
"Past" is impact.
"Present" - response.
"Future" - prediction.
The functional connection between the impact ("past") and the response ("present") is a transitive characteristic of the market environment which can be calculated using the
The well-known techniques of TAU - deconvolution, for example.
Construct a forecast ("future") on the basis of the found functional connection.
Huh? Where and where am I wrong?
Agreed.Missing another concept is the "afterlife".
Really confusing, I would say more so - all mysticism.
Missing are the tambourine and spellings as a functional link between these 'terms'.
And aren't the universally accepted categories and concepts from TAU enough to get the point across?
For example:
"Past" is impact.
"Present" - response.
"Future" - prediction.
The functional connection between the impact ("past") and the response ("present") is a transitive characteristic of the market environment which can be calculated using the following criteria
The well-known techniques of TAU - deconvolution, for example.
On the basis of the found functional connection construct the forecast ("future").
Huh? Where and where am I wrong?
I agree. There is another concept missing - the "afterlife".
Really confusing, I would say more, all mysticism.
There is not enough tambourine and incantations as a functional link between these "terms".
Are the generally recognised categories and concepts from TAU not enough to make a point?
For example:
"Past
"- impact.
"Present
"- response.
The functional relationship between the impact (past) and the response (present) is a transient characteristic of the market environment which can be calculated using
the well-known techniques of TAU - deconvolution, for example.
Based on the functional relationship found, build a forecast ("future").
Where and where am I wrong?
All right. There is asubconscious reflex that we have developed over many years -- it is more productive to communicate in thetechnologist' s languagewith the customer of the system. On the one hand, it is difficult (sometimes impossible) for the technologist to switch to TAU. On the other hand, it allows to see the task from the technologist-customer's point of view.
In this case, it was my initiative, and so I deliberately adopted this language. The result does not suffer from this.
Let me check the therapist's schedule for tomorrow...
I think I'll go... The stupor from the alphanumeracy is getting worse...(((.
I'll have a look at the therapist's schedule for tomorrow...
I think I'll go... The stupor from the alphanumeracy is getting worse...(((.
What is unclear? Using the three functions, I calculate the past, the present and the history of the emergence, the development of the trend formation process. I show that the sum (P+H) = AND, despite the differences of the functions themselves. Further I give a small error of this statement.
Don't pay attention to my nonsense, create and create in peace.
You know better, you have degrees and diplomas.
That is correct. There is a subconscious reflex that we have developed over the years - it is more productive to communicate in the technologist-customer language. On the one hand, it is difficult (sometimes impossible) for the technologist to switch to TAU. On the other hand, it allows to see the task through the customer technologist's eyes.
In this case, it was my initiative and so I consciously adopted this language. The result will not suffer from this.
Oleg, don't forget about the readers of the thread.
And they have long suffered because of the deviations from the canonical concepts.
Hence the lack of understanding and rejection by many.
Because of the inaccurate wording even associate professors (transition process specialists) do not understand the title of the branch, what to say about others...
That's right. There is a subconscious reflex that we have developed over the years - it is more productive to communicate in the technologist's language with the customer of the system. On the one hand, it is difficult (sometimes impossible) for the technologist to switch to TAU. On the other hand, it allows to see the task through the customer technologist's eyes.
In this case, it was my initiative and so I consciously adopted this language. The result will not suffer from this.
Oleg, don't forget about the readers of the thread.
And they have long suffered because of the deviations from the canonical concepts.
Hence the lack of understanding and rejection by many.
The title of the branch because of the inaccurate wording even associate professors (experts in transitions) do not understand, what to say about the rest ...
I will make a correction.