How is the expected payoff calculated? - page 2

 
paukas:
No. Normal is from two spreads and above. You have to count in pips.


Since when did the expected payoff become counted in pips?

Why don't you read the articles for starters?

https://www.mql5.com/ru/articles/1403

https://www.mql5.com/ru/articles/1486

 
Integer:


Since when did the expected payoff become counted in pips?

Why don't you read the articles for starters?

https://www.mql5.com/ru/articles/1403

https://www.mql5.com/ru/articles/1486

Right from the start, mate.

I'm not talking about how MT counts, I'm talking about how you should count. It should be counted in pips.

 
paukas:

From the very beginning, you know.

I'm not talking about how MT counts, I'm talking about how you should count. You have to count in points.


What's the difference if I count in terms of money instead of points?
 
bogati:

What is the difference if I count in terms of money rather than points?

you will be tied to the size of the lot.
 
paukas:

From the very beginning, you know.

I'm not talking about how MT counts, I'm talking about how you should count. You have to count in points.


Where does it go? In what annals is it written?

 
bogati:

What is the difference if I count in monetary terms rather than in points?
Your question: "what mo is considered normal" has no answers in monetary terms.
 
Integer:


Where does it have to be? In what annals is it recorded?


Really interesting. I've just checked the metastock report and there is no such indicator as average profit in pips. This is despite the fact that in metastock the testing is done with a constant lot.
 
Integer:


Where is it written? In what annals is it written?

Think about it for yourself. If someone tells you that the system has a $10 mo, that's bullshit,

but if someone says 5 points, it's something.

That's why if someone's pushing a test, I'm telling everyone: 0.1 lot, please. To keep it simple and clear.

 
paukas:

Think about it for yourself. If someone tells you that the system has a $10 mo, that's bullshit,

but if someone says 5 points, that's something.


The same bullshit, only worse. The main and most obvious indicators of a system's efficiency are profitability in % per unit time and drawdown in $ and %.
 
Integer:

It's the same shit, only worse. The main and most obvious indicators of a system's effectiveness are profitability in % per unit time and drawdown in $ and %.

No, the drawdown in $ and %. depends not only on the system, but also on the MM used.

You have to separate the meat from the dairy.

Reason: