1. open an order in the direction of the trend with equal SL and TP.
It's a good strategy))) Especially if you know in which direction the trend will continue and what the volatility will be, so stops do not get blown out)))
Allow the use of cookies to log in to the MQL5.com website.
Please enable the necessary setting in your browser, otherwise you will not be able to log in.
You are signed in. Two-factor authentication has been disabled. Set it up again and scan a new QR code, or continue with two-factor authentication disabled.
Has anyone tested this strategy?
1. we open an order in the direction of the trend with equal SL and TP.
2. If the TP is triggered, we open an order with the same direction.
3) If the SL triggered, we change the opening direction etc. etc. round and round, without stopping.
Yes. But it wasn't Buffett (or he didn't become Buffett, whichever you prefer to read)
But apparently he didn't go bankrupt either?
That's debatable. Probably went bankrupt. More than once.
Has anyone tested this strategy?
1. open an order in the direction of the trend with equal SL and TP.
Has anyone tested this strategy?
1. we open an order in the direction of the trend with equal SL and TP.
2. If the TP is triggered, we open an order with the same direction.
3) If the SL triggered, we change the opening direction etc. etc. round and round, without stopping.
"monkey" classic
Now that's debatable. It's more likely to go bankrupt. More than once.
"monkey" classic
Describe then, roughly, the mechanism of bankruptcy in this
He did not have a Sultonov indicator )))
What are its shortcomings? Can it be improved?
take the "monkey" - there is such a code on the forum - and check it out