[Archive! - page 664

New comment
 
TheXpert:
Go ahead. You can only say that if you have already done all of the above. Otherwise it's just demagoguery.
That's your stupid demagoguery for 664 pages. If you want to change something, do it, and do not bullshit around here in your spare time. I have not shown my dissatisfaction here, and I do not have to organize my own party, just to prove to someone out there that I have my own civic position. Your position is to smear shit all over the walls and to buckle up to the West, mine is different. But I obviously can't go along with you, I'm sorry.
 

A little joke comes to mind

A parliamentary candidate shouts everywhere about the corruption, bribes, kickbacks thriving in society

He is asked:

- Are you going to fight all this?

- No, I want to take part in it all!

 
DhP:

You are not reading my posts carefully.

That is exactly what I want to talk to you about, but in Russian, not in the language of a Vremya presenter.

I (we) are ready to unite with you, but in order to do so I need to understand what you are concerned about in our Russian everyday life. What are our similarities?

So, I return to my request: please voice your concerns.

You'll find out more about that in the next series, which takes place tomorrow.
 
C-4:
You'll find out more about that in the next series, which takes place tomorrow.
OK, it's a deal.
 
C-4: Let's calculate together the minimum amount of fudging for P. to score his 60%.

Anything written next is no longer interesting. I was talking about the Duma elections, not the Presidential elections. Everything is clear with his 64%: those who don't see an alternative voted for him (a political technology duck).

C-4, you are always speaking in poster language, and you are also twisting things around and answering your own questions instead of the questions you asked. You could make a good... Kurginyan.

Sorry, I have nothing to say to a man who won't listen.

 
C-4:
But I'm obviously not going out with you, I'm sorry.
Well, good riddance. Why are you posting here, then?
[Deleted]  
C-4:

No, it's you all who are talking nonsense on 663 pages of this thread. Alexey, you are a mathematician, let's calculate together the minimum amount of fraud for P to get his 60%. Suppose for P in reality no more than 10% of the population would have voted. Voter turnout was about 60% too. The country's population is about 130 million people. 130 * 0.6 * 0.5 = 39 million forged signatures. Now compare that number to the facts you are so fond of talking about. Where at which polling station was how many ballots stuffed? 100 ballots? 1000? 100,000? Not enough for such a result.


In reality Putin's rating at the moment is probably really around 50%... There wasn't much to fudge. And there is no need for rigging, signatures, stuffing, etc. when there are wizards at the CEC, there are governors appointed by you who are dependent on you and the governor, budgetary workers and pensioners who are dependent on you and the governor.

Then, when they say that elections are unfair, they do not only mean fraud, but also the use of state resources for the "benefit" of one candidate or one party. The absence of independent media, administrative and legal barriers to the establishment of new parties, etc.

With such administrative resources, controllable courts and security forces, staying in power is not that difficult, no matter what kind of ruler you are... You are the "king of the mountain", you have climbed up and you cannot get rid of them. We must change the laws, but who will change them if it's them again? A vicious circle. They will really start a revolution (God forbid), how long can you keep people for idiots?

 
Figar0:


In reality Putin's rating at the moment is probably really around 50%... There wasn't much to fudge. And there is no need for rigging, signatures, stuffing, etc. when there are wizards at the CEC, there are governors appointed by you who are dependent on you and the governor, budgetary workers and pensioners who are dependent on you and the governor.

Then, when they say that elections are unfair, they do not only mean fraud, but also the use of state resources for the "benefit" of one candidate or one party. Lack of independent media, administrative and legal barriers to the creation of new parties, etc.

With such administrative resources, controllable courts and security forces, staying in power is not that difficult, no matter what kind of ruler you are... You are the "king of the mountain", you have climbed up and you cannot get rid of them. We must change the laws, but who will change them if it's them again? A vicious circle. They will really end up with a revolution (God forbid), how long can they keep people as idiots?

As long as brainwashing is successful even on educated people like C-4, nothing will change in the country. The people in general need to grow up to a new, more progressive president, but for now they, judging by the number of votes, are quite happy with the present one. Unfortunately many people believe that there is no alternative to the current government. And if someone else comes to power there will be revolution, civil war, famine and natural disasters. And the people are ready to put up with bureaucratic overreach, corruption and the lack of development of the country, as they say "as long as there is no war".
 

I don't want to try it myself, but maybe someone will be interested...

The picture came out (transition) after entering the string: youtube.com

 
DDFedor:

I don't want to try it myself, but maybe someone will be interested...

The picture came out (transition) after entering the string: youtube.com


Congratulations, you have a trojan :))))
1...657658659660661662663664665666667668669670671...707
New comment