Counter positions: self-deception or subtle tool? - page 2
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
are these longs or shorts? how do you tell the difference?
Up is long, down is short.
I'll explain in a moment.
Can I draw it?
Two different TS work on the same account.
The TS are independent of each other.
Two different TS work on the same account.
The TS are independent of each other.
I thought we had agreed that you would count for yourself. Come on, describe the sequence of deals in detail, so that there is no confusion - for the sake of clarity. I mean: from such a level in which lot in which direction. For loc.
1. At the point A sell from the level 1.4055, lot 0.1.
2. At the point B buy from the level 1.3755, lot 0.1
3. At the point 1 buy from the level 1.3755, lot 0.1
4. At point 2 sell (the lot appears) from the level 1.3921, lot 0.1
5. At the point 3 buy from the level 1.3821, lot 0.1
6. At point4 sell (creates a lock) from the level 1.3988, lot 0.1.
7. At point 5 buy from level 1.3888, lot 0.1.
5. At point C close at 1.4254
5. Point 6 close at 1.4254
To be more useful try to recalculate in net as you see it.
I have given you the calculated tray variant in the hope that you, as a net supporter, will calculate your own.
P.S. As a reminder, each TS is reversible - i.e. when a new position is opened, the previous position is closed.Svetlana, if by your TS, so successfully get into sells on every pullback, tell me to what point the price will reach on the dashboard from the figure 6, to be able to close the low sell order? Or is it just a theoretical picture with no reality?
The realities are: do such lots have a right to live, or can they be successfully replaced by netting?
That's what we're trying to figure out. In the red corner of the ring (loki) -- Swetten, in the blue (netting) -- VladislavVG.
That's the theory.
... Or who is the hero who will bring the teams of these two systems together in netting? :-D
The reality is this: are such locks allowed to live, or can they be successfully replaced by netting?
so what is the provable postulate from all this?
I think the lock option is simpler, clearer and more profitable.
For netting, it will not be locks, but linear sections with the previous position filled in. In this case there is no difference. But the second TS will be more profitable in this case because netting works on history more often.
Figures on the studio.